Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT01207856

Last Updated: 2016-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite the need for cognitive rehabilitation, there is a paucity of well-designed research studies to investigate treatment approaches or their effectiveness in MS. Most of published studies suffer from significant methodological flaws including small sample size, short follow-up periods, and lack of specific outcome criteria to determine improvement. O'Brien et al. (2008) recently reviewed 16 studies of cognitive rehabilitation designed to persons with MS and found only 4 class I studies and only one class I study of rehabilitation of attention deficits. Methodologically rigorous research is needed to confirm the preliminary results reported by these studies and determine the effectiveness and efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation interventions in attention deficits in MS. O'Brien et al. listed limitations found in previous studies that must be addressed in future studies. The present study was designed according to these recommendations. It is a randomized, controlled study, in parallel groups, evaluator blinded.

Number of participants: 25 RRMS patients in the active group, 25 RRMS patients in the control group and 25 healthy subjects.

The protocol will be proposed to RRMS patients AFFILIATED TO FRENCH SOCIAL SECURITY referred to the investigators center by practicing neurologists and fulfilling the inclusion criteria for screening.

Patients will be randomised between two groups. The active group (25 patients) will be treated by rehabilitation. Individual rehabilitation procedures will be focused on attention, executive functions and IPS. The program will be tailored to each patient cognitive status depending on the impairments identified during the initial assessment while maintaining a systematic work on attention and executive functions. A total of 50 sessions lasting one hour at a rate of 3 sessions per week for a total period of 4 months will be proposed. Patients randomized in the other group will participate to group session every week without specific cognitive rehabilitation. 25 healthy control subjects (group C), matched to patients for education, gender and age with patients of groups A/B will have the same evaluation procedures than patients.

Evaluation will be performed at baseline, after 4 months (end of treatment period) and after 8 months. Evaluation will include clinical testing, cognitive battery (paper/pencil and computer tests), cognitive ecological evaluation (Computer test of attention in a virtual reality environment and driving test on a driving simulator), questionnaires about daily life and MRI (fMRI and MRI). All patients and healthy subjects will undergo the fMRI protocol using a paradigm previously published by the investigators group (Bonnet et al., 2009): Go/No-go paradigm with increasing difficulty during four successive conditions (the Tonic Alertness task, Go/No-go (IG), reversal Go/No-go (RG), and complex Go/No-go (CG). In a previous study the investigators observed compensatory activation in MS patients as compared to healthy controls for the three first conditions and a saturation of compensatory processes for the more complex. In the present study, the investigators hypothesize that a similar pattern will occur at baseline and that cognitive rehabilitation will improve brain compensation at the fourth level of complexity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent disabling neurological disease in young adults. Over the past two decades, cognitive impairment in MS has received increasing interest. Although for a long time described in MS text books, it has been underestimated until recently. It is now accepted as an important feature of MS with a high impact on working and social abilities. The cognitive disorders in MS are dominated by a slowdown in information processing speed (IPS), as well as disturbances of attention and memory. The nature of cognitive findings suggest that the impairments depend on the integrity of large-scale cortical integrative processes, which involve long-distance white matter projections which can be impaired due to diffuse demyelinating injury in patients with MS. At the early stages of MS there is increasing evidence that neuroplasticity, the ability of the brain to respond to various insults, allows adaptive reorganization of cognitive functions to limit impairment, despite widespread tissue damage. Recently, we showed that at the early stages of RRMS compensatory capacities are relatively maintained, especially in highly-educated patients suggesting that cognitive training might be useful. The requirement of cerebral compensatory mechanisms to perform the cognitive tests was postulated in MS patients on the basis of functional MRI (fMRI) studies. By using a go/no go task of increasing complexity in a fMRI study in RRMS patients, we observed that a limitation of this compensatory cerebral recruitment appears when the attentional solicitations reach a particular level of difficulty. We postulate that a cognitive training program may help to maintain these compensatory capacities. Therefore, we propose to evaluate the effect of the program on brain activation using a task with several levels of attention requirement (increased attention load) by using fMRI and to evaluate in parallel its clinical effect and its impact in daily activities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Rehabilitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A

specific cognitive rehabilitation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

specific cognitive rehabilitation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Individual rehabilitation procedures will be focused on attention, executive functions, IPS and working memory. The program will be tailored to each patient cognitive status depending on the impairments identified during the initial assessment while maintaining a systematic work on attention and executive functions. A total of 50 sessions lasting one hour at a rate of 3 sessions per week for a total period of 4 months will be proposed. Sessions will include varied exercises according to complexity and presentation modality, using computerized and "paper-and-pencil" tasks and metacognitive training. Work will be progressive, depending on the progresses achieved (increase complexity and intensity of the exercises according to success at the previous level of exercises).

Groupe B : non specific rehabilitation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

non specific cognitive rehabilitation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A total of 50 sessions lasting one hour at a rate of 3 sessions per week for a total period of 4 months will be proposed by group composed to 5 patients

group C

group C for MRI, neuropsychological and ecological assessments

Group Type OTHER

no intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

no intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

specific cognitive rehabilitation

Individual rehabilitation procedures will be focused on attention, executive functions, IPS and working memory. The program will be tailored to each patient cognitive status depending on the impairments identified during the initial assessment while maintaining a systematic work on attention and executive functions. A total of 50 sessions lasting one hour at a rate of 3 sessions per week for a total period of 4 months will be proposed. Sessions will include varied exercises according to complexity and presentation modality, using computerized and "paper-and-pencil" tasks and metacognitive training. Work will be progressive, depending on the progresses achieved (increase complexity and intensity of the exercises according to success at the previous level of exercises).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

non specific cognitive rehabilitation

A total of 50 sessions lasting one hour at a rate of 3 sessions per week for a total period of 4 months will be proposed by group composed to 5 patients

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

no intervention

no intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

patients

* male or female relapsing remitting or secondary progressive or primary progressive Multiple sclerosis patients according to Polman et al. (2005),
* age 18-55; disease duration \>6 months and ≤15 years,
* right handed,

Patients will be eligible for randomization (cognitive inclusion criterion) if they performed worse than :

* 2 scores \<1 standard deviation (SD) on the scores evaluating information processing speed and attention (IPS-Attention) and 1 score \<1DS on other tests assessing executive functions (EF) and working memory (WM).

or

* if they performed worse than 2 scores \<1 SD on the 5 tests of information processing speed, attention and executive function (SDMT, Stroop and TMT battery GREFEX, and divided attention substests (TAP) and 1 score \<1DS on other tests assessing information processing speed, and executive and attention functions (IPS / FAE) and working memory (WM).

healthy volunteers

* male or female,
* age 18-55 matched for age, gender and education
* Accepting to participate and signing the informed consent
* affiliated to french social security

Exclusion Criteria

* existing other neurological or psychiatric disorder, visual, oculomotor, auditory and motor impairments precluding ability to perform computerized tasks and the driving simulator tasks,
* prior history of addictive behaviour,
* MS attack in the 2 months preceding the screening,
* corticosteroid pulse therapy within 2 months preceding screening,
* severe cognitive deficits or dementia (MMS\<27), moderate to severe visuospatial incapacity (type IV or V at the Rey figure score \< 28), moderate to severe depression (BDI \>27),
* Participant without driving licence
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Serono International SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

ARSEP foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruno Brochet, Md PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Neurologie - Pôle des Neurosciences Cliniques, CHU de Bordeaux.

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moroso A, Ruet A, Lamargue-Hamel D, Munsch F, Deloire M, Coupe P, Ouallet JC, Planche V, Moscufo N, Meier DS, Tourdias T, Guttmann CR, Dousset V, Brochet B. Posterior lobules of the cerebellum and information processing speed at various stages of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;88(2):146-151. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313867. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27789541 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX 2010/07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.