Veritas Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia (PEH) Repair Pilot Trial
NCT ID: NCT01195545
Last Updated: 2018-07-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A PEH occurs when the stomach protrudes through the diaphragm next to the esophagus. The chance of recurrence of a Hiatal hernia after laparoscopic PEH repair is between 20-40% within 6 months.During laparoscopic PEH repair, a mesh-type product is used as a scaffold. The mesh serves as a reinforcing material during the surgical repair. It is cut to the appropriate size needed for the hernia and sutured to the surrounding diaphragmatic tissue. There are many different types of meshes available on the market, and vary in the degree of manageability, strength, and adherence.
Although surgical meshes work on the same principal, the variance between materials may affect patient outcomes. There is evidence that a biologic mesh, specifically one derived from Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS), decreases the short-term (6-month) recurrence rates compared to a synthetic mesh or another type of biologic mesh. A biologic mesh, serving as a scaffold, will be replaced by the patient's own tissue after about 6 months. Theoretically, this would prevent the possible complications associated with synthetic mesh including mesh erosion into the esophagus or stricture of the esophagus.
There are some case series showing similar short-term results between the different biologic meshes, but there is no direct comparative data.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair With Small Intestine Submucosa
NCT00786084
Ovitex in Paraesophageal and Large Hiatal Hernia Repair
NCT06193551
Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernia
NCT02242526
Use of Strattice Mesh in Paraesophageal Hernia Surgery
NCT01678157
Randomized, Prospective Controlled Trial of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair With Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS)
NCT00272922
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Veritas Mesh in Hernia Repair
Subjects undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair using a bovine pericardium mesh (BP) (Veritas® Collagen Matrix, Synovis ®, St. Paul MN) as a reinforcing material during repair.
Veritas® Collagen Matrix
biological mesh in hernia repair
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Veritas® Collagen Matrix
biological mesh in hernia repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 1\. Is greater than 5 cm hiatal hernia on Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) series
* 2\. Has evidence that the stomach or other viscera is present in the hernia and does not spontaneously reduce from the mediastinum
* 3\. Has significant symptoms or signs of a paraesophageal hernia: heartburn, dysphagia, chest pain, shortness of breath, post-prandial abdominal pain, early satiety, odynophagia or chronic anemia
B. Consenting adult ≥18 years \~ documentation of informed consent will be recorded in the research records
C. Must be able to participate in follow-up evaluations (subjects must be fully cognitive)
D. Has a telephone
E. Free of cognitive or speech impairment
Exclusion Criteria
B. Associated gastrointestinal diseases that require extensive medical or surgical intervention that might interfere with quality of life assessment (e.g. Crohn's disease)
C. Emergent operation for acute volvulus (twisting/rotation of the bowel leading to obstruction)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Synovis Surgical Innovations
INDUSTRY
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brant Oelschlager
Professor and Chief of General Surgery, Surgery, General Surgery Division
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brant K. Oelschlager, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38048
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.