Trial of the PresVIEW Implant for the Improvement of Near Vision in Patients With Presbyopia
NCT ID: NCT01166568
Last Updated: 2018-09-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
337 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-12-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of the Presbia Flexivue Microlens™
NCT02110472
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Corneal Inlay for the Improvement of Near and Intermediate Vision in Pseudophakic Presbyopic Subjects
NCT02668523
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Corneal Inlay for the Improvement of Near Vision in Presbyopic Patients
NCT01373580
Long Term Follow-up of the VisAbility™ Micro Insert System for Presbyopic Patients
NCT03811249
Safety and Effectiveness Study of the AcuFocus Corneal Inlay ACI 7000PDT in Presbyopes
NCT00819299
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An additional randomized sub-study was performed on 48 subjects with the PSI Second Generation PresView™(SGP) implant, model number SGP-046. A 2:1 randomization was used to determine the 32 subjects assigned to be implanted and the 16 subjects assigned to the observation/deferred implantation control arm. Subjects randomized to the deferred implantation control arm were eligible to receive the PSI after completion of the 6 months of observation in the study.
All subjects interested in participating in the study were screened for eligibility, and informed consent was obtained from those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible subjects were examined preoperatively to obtain a medical history and baseline ocular data.
Effectiveness: The following tests/measurements used to evaluate the effectiveness of the PSI procedure will be included in the study protocol:
* Near visual acuity of the operated eye/eyes as compared with baseline (uncorrected and distance corrected)
* Reading acuity of the operated eye/eyes as compared with baseline (uncorrected and distance corrected)
The PSI procedure will be defined as successful if a logMar equivalent to Snellen 20/40 or better (logMar 0.3) is achieved in ≥ 75% of patients or if 75% of patients realize an improvement ≥ 2 lines in distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). For most patients, this will translate into the ability to read the majority of newspaper and magazine print without a near optical aid.
Safety: Primary safety outcomes for safety will include:
* Incidence of anterior segment ischemia
* Decrease in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of more than 2 lines from baseline at 1-month or more postoperatively
* Decrease in best distance corrected near acuity (with add) of more than 2 lines from baseline at 1-month or more postoperatively
* Intraocular Pressure (IOP) increase \> 10mm Hg over baseline or IOP \> 25mm Hg after 1 Day postoperative
* Signs of chronic inflammation (e.g. uveitis or chronic conjunctival hyperemia) at 2 months or more postoperatively
* Increase in axial length of ≥ 0.20mm accompanied by a \> 0.5 diopter myopic shift in manifest spherical equivalent distance refraction.
* Incidence of adverse events: total not to exceed 5%, and the incidence of each event should not exceed 1-2%
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implantation-Non Randomized
Subjects are not participants in the randomized sub-study. PresView Scleral Implants surgical placed in the eye(s) after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria.
PresVIEW Scleral Implants
Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.
Implantation-Randomized
Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study. Subjects were randomized to the Immediate Treatment group. PresView Scleral Implants surgical placed in the eye(s)Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria.
PresVIEW Scleral Implants
Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.
Deferred Implantation-Randomized
Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized to the Deferred Treatment group are observed for 6 months. Upon completion of the observation follow-up, subjects can opt to have PresView Scleral Implants surgically placed in the eye(s) and become part of the overall study experimental group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PresVIEW Scleral Implants
Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject must have a best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
* Subject must have SLOAN distance corrected near visual acuity @ 40cm in the operative eye/eyes of 20/50 to 20/100 (inclusive).
* Subject should have a manifest distance spherical equivalent refractive correction in the operative eye/eyes of from -0.50 to +0.75 diopters with no more than 1.00 diopter of astigmatism and should require at least a +1.50 diopter add. The distance manifest refraction spherical equivalent and the distance cycloplegic refraction spherical equivalent must be within 0.50 diopters of each other.
* Subject must be phakic in the study eye
* Subject must be mentally competent to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
* Subject must be able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Scleral thickness less than 530 μm in the operative eye/eyes.
* Any previous eye surgeries including cataract, LASIK, or Muscle surgery
* Any history of prior extraocular muscle surgery, specifically the recti or oblique muscles.
* Any chronic systemic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, Lupus, etc.
* Any eye diseases such as eye inflammation, infection, cataract, or retinal diseases
* Allergic to any medications used in the study.
* The patient may not have participated in a device clinical study for the operative eye within the last 3 months and may not have been implanted with PSI devices in this or any other study.
50 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Refocus Group, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Schanzlin, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chief Medical Officer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boxer-Wachler Vision Institute
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Gordon-Weiss-Schanzlin Vision Institute
San Diego, California, United States
The Midwest Center for Sight
Des Plaines, Illinois, United States
Jacksoneye
Lake Villa, Illinois, United States
Vision/Advanced Eye Center
Lombard, Illinois, United States
The Eye Care Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Associated Vision Consultants
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Cornea Associates
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Fichte, Endl and Elmer Eyecare Creekside Center
Amherst, New York, United States
Southeastern Eye Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Eye Associates of South Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Wang Vision Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Braverman-Terry-Oei-Eye Associates
San Antonio, Texas, United States
The Center for Corrective Eye Surgery
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
US Food and Drug Administration Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P-277-5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.