Trial of the PresVIEW Implant for the Improvement of Near Vision in Patients With Presbyopia

NCT ID: NCT01166568

Last Updated: 2018-09-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

337 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PresVIEW™ Scleral Implant (PSI) for the improvement of near visual acuity in presbyopic patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The clinical investigation of the PresView™ Scleral Implant (PSI) is a prospective multicenter clinical trial in which a total of 330 subjects were enrolled and implanted with the PSI and followed for a period of 24 months at up to 14 clinical sites.

An additional randomized sub-study was performed on 48 subjects with the PSI Second Generation PresView™(SGP) implant, model number SGP-046. A 2:1 randomization was used to determine the 32 subjects assigned to be implanted and the 16 subjects assigned to the observation/deferred implantation control arm. Subjects randomized to the deferred implantation control arm were eligible to receive the PSI after completion of the 6 months of observation in the study.

All subjects interested in participating in the study were screened for eligibility, and informed consent was obtained from those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible subjects were examined preoperatively to obtain a medical history and baseline ocular data.

Effectiveness: The following tests/measurements used to evaluate the effectiveness of the PSI procedure will be included in the study protocol:

* Near visual acuity of the operated eye/eyes as compared with baseline (uncorrected and distance corrected)
* Reading acuity of the operated eye/eyes as compared with baseline (uncorrected and distance corrected)

The PSI procedure will be defined as successful if a logMar equivalent to Snellen 20/40 or better (logMar 0.3) is achieved in ≥ 75% of patients or if 75% of patients realize an improvement ≥ 2 lines in distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). For most patients, this will translate into the ability to read the majority of newspaper and magazine print without a near optical aid.

Safety: Primary safety outcomes for safety will include:

* Incidence of anterior segment ischemia
* Decrease in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of more than 2 lines from baseline at 1-month or more postoperatively
* Decrease in best distance corrected near acuity (with add) of more than 2 lines from baseline at 1-month or more postoperatively
* Intraocular Pressure (IOP) increase \> 10mm Hg over baseline or IOP \> 25mm Hg after 1 Day postoperative
* Signs of chronic inflammation (e.g. uveitis or chronic conjunctival hyperemia) at 2 months or more postoperatively
* Increase in axial length of ≥ 0.20mm accompanied by a \> 0.5 diopter myopic shift in manifest spherical equivalent distance refraction.
* Incidence of adverse events: total not to exceed 5%, and the incidence of each event should not exceed 1-2%

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Presbyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A non-randomized arm was run in parallel with a randomized sub-study consisting of 2 arms; Immediate Treatment and Deferred Treatment. Upon completion of the 6 month observation period, the Deferred Treatment group then crosses over upon implantation to become part of the overall study group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Implantation-Non Randomized

Subjects are not participants in the randomized sub-study. PresView Scleral Implants surgical placed in the eye(s) after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PresVIEW Scleral Implants

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.

Implantation-Randomized

Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study. Subjects were randomized to the Immediate Treatment group. PresView Scleral Implants surgical placed in the eye(s)Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PresVIEW Scleral Implants

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.

Deferred Implantation-Randomized

Subjects are participants in the randomized sub-study after enrollment and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized to the Deferred Treatment group are observed for 6 months. Upon completion of the observation follow-up, subjects can opt to have PresView Scleral Implants surgically placed in the eye(s) and become part of the overall study experimental group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PresVIEW Scleral Implants

Subjects are implanted with the PresView Scleral Spacing Implants and followed for 24 months.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject must be between 50-60 years old
* Subject must have a best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
* Subject must have SLOAN distance corrected near visual acuity @ 40cm in the operative eye/eyes of 20/50 to 20/100 (inclusive).
* Subject should have a manifest distance spherical equivalent refractive correction in the operative eye/eyes of from -0.50 to +0.75 diopters with no more than 1.00 diopter of astigmatism and should require at least a +1.50 diopter add. The distance manifest refraction spherical equivalent and the distance cycloplegic refraction spherical equivalent must be within 0.50 diopters of each other.
* Subject must be phakic in the study eye
* Subject must be mentally competent to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
* Subject must be able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic uveitis or other recurrent anterior or posterior segment inflammation in either eye.
* Scleral thickness less than 530 μm in the operative eye/eyes.
* Any previous eye surgeries including cataract, LASIK, or Muscle surgery
* Any history of prior extraocular muscle surgery, specifically the recti or oblique muscles.
* Any chronic systemic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, Lupus, etc.
* Any eye diseases such as eye inflammation, infection, cataract, or retinal diseases
* Allergic to any medications used in the study.
* The patient may not have participated in a device clinical study for the operative eye within the last 3 months and may not have been implanted with PSI devices in this or any other study.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Refocus Group, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Schanzlin, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief Medical Officer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Boxer-Wachler Vision Institute

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Gordon-Weiss-Schanzlin Vision Institute

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

The Midwest Center for Sight

Des Plaines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Jacksoneye

Lake Villa, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Vision/Advanced Eye Center

Lombard, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Eye Care Institute

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Associated Vision Consultants

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cornea Associates

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Fichte, Endl and Elmer Eyecare Creekside Center

Amherst, New York, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Eye Center

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Eye Associates of South Tulsa

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Wang Vision Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Braverman-Terry-Oei-Eye Associates

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Center for Corrective Eye Surgery

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.fda.gov

US Food and Drug Administration Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P-277-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.