Investigation of the Presbia Flexivue Microlens™

NCT ID: NCT02110472

Last Updated: 2016-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

412 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Presbia Flexivue Microlens is a corneal inlay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Presbyopia is a multifactorial physiological aging mechanism that leads to a progressive functional loss of near vision. In addition to the use of reading glasses for presbyopia, a wide variety of procedures have been investigated by ophthalmologists to correct this refractive error. Cornea laser surgery with multifocal patterns or monovision approaches were developed including LASIK, PresbyLASIK, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), thin-flap femto-LASIK or sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (SBK). Conductive keratoplasty (CK), clear lens extraction or cataract surgery using multifocal, pseudo-accommodative intraocular lenses (IOLs) or monovision monofocal IOLs are also some of the techniques that have been used for the treatment of presbyopia.

Corneal laser surgery and CK are minimally invasive methods, but they provoke irreversible changes of the corneal anatomy, whereas scleral surgery and clear lens extraction are more invasive techniques. The necessity to develop a minimally invasive, reversible, and safe surgical technique with an easy learning curve for patients between 45 and 60 years, led to the development of refractive intracorneal lenses (inlays) (such as the AcuFocus, Inc. KAMRA™, ReVision Optics® PresbyLens®, and the Presbia Flexivue Microlens™) placed inside the corneal stroma. These inlays are refractive lenses that have a central zone free of refractive power and a peripheral zone with a standard positive refractive power. These inlays are inserted inside the corneal stroma of the non-dominant eye, generally offering two different focal points, one for the far vision and a different for the near vision respectively. The pocket of the cornea is created using a laser (details to be provided later in this protocol).

The Presbia Flexivue Microlens is intended to improve near vision and decrease dependence on reading glasses in presbyopic adults who are tolerant of monovision (as evaluated by participation in a monovision tolerance trial (5 to 7 days minimum)), who require a reading add of +1.50 D to +3.50 D, who have MRSE between +1.00 D and 0.75 D with no more than 0.75 D of refractive cylinder, and who have stable MRSE within 0.50 D over the past 12 months.

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Presbia Flexivue Microlens™ (hereinafter referred to as the "Microlens") implanted in presbyopes for improvement of near vision.

Investigational Plan: This is a prospective, non-randomized, unmasked, multicenter clinical investigation. A total of 412 subjects at up to 11 investigational sites in the United States will undergo insertion of the Microlens in non-dominant eyes, and will be followed through 36 months postoperative (assuming an estimated 10% per year lost to follow-up). Each site will contribute a targeted minimum of 20 treated subjects, but no more than 25% of the total subjects treated in the study. Data on a minimum of 300 subjects with 24 month data will be submitted as part of the Premarket Approval; all subjects will be followed through 36 months postoperative. Subjects from outside the United States will not be enrolled in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Presbyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Presbia Flexivue Microlens Corneal Inlay

Presbia Flexivue Microlens implanted in corneal pocket in nondominant eye

Group Type OTHER

Corneal inlay

Intervention Type DEVICE

Presbia Flexivue Microlens implantation in corneal pocket created in nondominant eyes of emmetropic presbyopes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corneal inlay

Presbia Flexivue Microlens implantation in corneal pocket created in nondominant eyes of emmetropic presbyopes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Presbia Flexivue Microlens Presbia Microlens

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects must be emmetropes with presbyopia, between ≥ 45 years and ≤ 60 years of age at time of eligibility visit.
* Subjects must need a reading add of +1.50 D to +3.50 D.
* Subjects must have uncorrected near visual acuity of 20/50 or worse.
* Subjects must have near visual acuity correctable to 20/20 or better in each eye.
* Subjects must have distance visual acuity correctable to 20/25 or better in each eye.
* Subjects must have a preoperative spherical equivalent of +1.00 D to -0.75 D with no more than 0.75 D of refractive cylinder as determined by cycloplegic refraction in each eye.
* Subjects must have a photopic pupil size of \> 1.6 mm in the eye to be implanted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects in whom the non-dominant eye cannot be determined using one of the methods identified in the test of ocular dominance.
* Subjects who do not complete the monovision tolerance trial (minimum of 5 to 7 days).
* Subjects who report that they were not completely satisfied with their vision during the monovision tolerance trial.
* Subjects who report that they experienced debilitating or significant visual symptoms such as halos, glare, double vision, etc. during the monovision tolerance trial.
* Subjects with a difference of ≥ 1.00 D between the spherical equivalent manifest refraction and the spherical equivalent cycloplegic refraction.
* Subject with a preferred near working distance of \< 35 cm or \> 45 cm.
* Subjects with corneal thickness \< 500 microns in the eye to be implanted.
* Subjects with clinically significant anterior segment pathology, including cataracts, in either eye.
* Subjects with residual, recurrent, active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease or any progressive corneal abnormalities (including endothelial dystrophy, guttata in the central cornea, etc.) in the eye to be treated.
* Subjects with keratoconus (or keratoconus suspect), amblyopia, recurrent erosion syndrome or corneal dystrophy in the eye to be treated.
* Subjects with a history of chronic dry eye not controlled on therapy or with superficial punctuate keratitis (SPK) grade \> II (i.e., greater than mild) based on Oxford Grading Scale in the eye to be treated.
* Subjects with abnormal corneal mires on topography maps of the eye to be treated.
* Subjects who require canthotomy to generate a corneal tunnel in the eye to be treated.
* Subjects with progressive retinal pathology with a reasonable chance of causing a reduction in BCVA from preoperative in the eye to be treated.
* Subjects who have undergone previous intraocular or corneal surgery including cataract and refractive surgery (e.g., LASIK surgery) in either eye.
* Subjects using ophthalmic medication(s) other than artificial tears for treatment of ocular pathology.
* Subjects with a history of autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or clinically significant atopic syndrome.
* Subjects with a history of herpes zoster or herpes simplex keratitis.
* Subjects with a history of steroid-responsive rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), or a preoperative IOP \> 21 mmHg or glaucoma.
* Subjects with distorted, non-reactive, or decentered pupils.
* Subjects taking medication for the control of diabetes.
* Subjects on chronic systemic or topical corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapy that may affect wound healing, and any immuno-compromised subjects (use of intranasal steroids for seasonal allergies are acceptable).
* Subjects using systemic medications (e.g., amiodarone) or medications with significant ocular side effects.
* Subjects who are pregnant, or are considering becoming pregnant during the time of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PresbiBio, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert K Maloney, MD, MA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Maloney Vision Institute

Mickey Gordon, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gordon-Weiss-Schanzlin Vision Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assil Eye Institute

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Gordon-Weiss-Schanzlin

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Maloney Vision Institute

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Eye and Laser Center

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Center for Sight

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kraft Eye Institute

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Physicians Protocol

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Eye Clinic

Brecksville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Berkeley Eye and Laser Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hoopes Vision, Laser Correction Center

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

The Eye Center

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.TossYourReaders.com

Website dedicated to patient recruitment (approved by WIRB on 4/3/2014).

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLP-12-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus)
NCT04632784 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA