A Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Effect of Perampanel (E2007) on Cognition, Growth, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics in Adolescents

NCT ID: NCT01161524

Last Updated: 2019-05-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

133 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of perampanel on cognition, growth, and development in adolescents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study consisted of the Core Study and the Extension Part A and B. The Core Study consisted of 2 phases: Prerandomization and Randomization. The Prerandomization Phase lasted up to 1 week, during which participants were assessed for their eligibility to participate in the study. The Randomization Phase consisted of 3 periods: Titration (6 weeks), Maintenance (13 weeks), and Follow-up (4 weeks; only for those participants not rolling over into the Extension Phase). During the Core Study Titration and Maintenance Periods, participants were randomized into perampanel (2 to 12 mg per day) or placebo treatment groups in a 2:1 ratio within each of the age-matched categories (ie, greater than or equal to 12 to less than 15 and greater than or equal to 15 to less than 18).

The extension phase consisted of part A (Conversion Period - 6 weeks and Maintenance period - 25 weeks) and Part B (Optional Extension Phase -52 weeks). The maximum duration for participation in Part B was 52 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Perampenal (Core Study)

Participants received perampanel 2 mg per day and up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to a target dose range of 8 to 12 mg per day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Perampanel

Intervention Type DRUG

2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.

Placebo (Core Study)

Participants received matching placebo tablets once a day (6 tablets of placebo).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo taken once daily.

Perampanel (Extension Phase)

During the Extension Phase, participants previously assigned to perampanel arm (Core Study) continued taking study medication at the dose achieved at the end of the Core Study once daily. Participants previously assigned to a placebo arm (Core Study) started perampanel dose at 2 mg/day and up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments up to a maximum dose of 12 mg/day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Perampanel

Intervention Type DRUG

2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perampanel

2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching Placebo taken once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Considered reliable and willing to be available for the study duration and was able to record seizures and report adverse events (AEs) themselves or had a legal guardian or a caregiver who could record seizures and report AEs for them.
2. Understand the requirements of the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) System tests and able to perform the tests appropriately at Visit 1.
3. Male or female, 12 to less than 18 years of age at the time of consent/assent
4. Had a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy's (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981).
5. Diagnosis was established at least 6 months prior to Visit 1, by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG) that was consistent with localization-related epilepsy; normal interictal EEGs were allowed provided that the subject met the other diagnosis criterion (ie, clinical history).
6. Had a brain imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] scan or computed tomography \[CT\]) within the 5 years prior to Visit 1 that ruled out a progressive cause of epilepsy.
7. Had at least 1 partial-onset seizure during the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 despite a stable regimen of 1 to 3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
8. Were currently being treated with stable doses of 1-3 AEDs. Only 1 inducer AED (either carbamazepine or phenytoin) out of the maximum of 3 AEDs was allowed.
9. Were on a stable dose of the same concomitant AED(s) for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1; in the case where a new AED regimen was initiated for a subject, the dose must have been stable for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1.
10. Female subjects of childbearing potential must had a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at Visit 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomization at Visit 2. Female subjects of period of at least 60 days following administration of the last dose of study medication to commit to the consistent and correct use of a medically acceptable method of birth control (e.g., a double-barrier method \[condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide\]). Abstinence was considered an acceptable method of contraception on a case by case basis upon prior approval by the Medical Monitor.
11. Had an intelligence quotient (IQ) of greater than or equal to 70, using the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition (KBIT-2).
12. Provided written informed consent signed by the legal guardian and a written assent from the subject prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures.

Extension Phase:

Had completed all scheduled visits up to and including Visit 8 in the Core Study Randomization Phase.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had a diagnosis of primary generalized epilepsies or seizures such as absences and/or myoclonic epilepsies.
2. Had current or a history of pseudo-seizures (psychogenic non-epileptic seizures \[PNES\]) within approximately 5 years prior to Visit 1.
3. Had a diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
4. Had seizure clusters where individual seizures could not be counted.
5. Had a history of status epilepticus that required hospitalization during the 12 months prior to the Visit 1.
6. Had an unstable psychiatric diagnosis that could confound the investigator's ability to conduct the study or that could prevent completion of the protocol specified tests (e.g., significant suicide risk, including suicidal behavior and ideation 6 months prior to Visit 1, current psychotic disorder, or acute mania).
7. Had any concomitant illnesses/co-morbidities (e.g., autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder \[ADHD\]) at Visit 1 that could severely affect cognitive function during the course of the study.
8. Had previously participated in a clinical trial involving perampanel.
9. Had chronically or routinely use benzodiazepines and who have not discontinued the use at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Haichen Yang, M.D., M.A.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Study Director

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Gibbsboro, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Ottignies, , Belgium

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Mangalore, , India

Site Status

Nagpur, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Secunderabad, , India

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Communidad de, Spain

Site Status

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Nonthaburi, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Czechia Hungary India Latvia Poland South Korea Spain Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bresnahan R, Hill RA, Wang J. Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010961.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37059702 (View on PubMed)

Pina-Garza JE, Lagae L, Villanueva V, Renfroe JB, Laurenza A, Williams B, Kumar D, Meador KJ. Long-term effects of adjunctive perampanel on cognition in adolescents with partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29653338 (View on PubMed)

Meador KJ, Yang H, Pina-Garza JE, Laurenza A, Kumar D, Wesnes KA. Cognitive effects of adjunctive perampanel for partial-onset seizures: A randomized trial. Epilepsia. 2016 Feb;57(2):243-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13279. Epub 2016 Jan 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26724782 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E2007-G000-235

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perampanel Titration and Cognitive Effects
NCT04417907 TERMINATED PHASE4
Pediatric Epilepsy Study
NCT00050947 COMPLETED PHASE3