A Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Effect of Perampanel (E2007) on Cognition, Growth, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics in Adolescents
NCT ID: NCT01161524
Last Updated: 2019-05-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
133 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Perampanel Oral Suspension on Seizure Frequency in Pediatric Subjects Maintained on One to Three Stable Antiepileptic Drugs
NCT01527006
A Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel (E2007) Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial-onset Seizures
NCT01618695
A Study to Investigate Dosage, Effectiveness, and Safety of Perampanel When Used as First Add-on Therapy in Participants >=12 Years With Partial Onset Seizures With or Without Secondary Generalization or With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Associated With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy
NCT04252846
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Participants With Childhood Epilepsy
NCT04015141
Perampanel as Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatrics With Partial Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures
NCT02849626
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The extension phase consisted of part A (Conversion Period - 6 weeks and Maintenance period - 25 weeks) and Part B (Optional Extension Phase -52 weeks). The maximum duration for participation in Part B was 52 weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Perampenal (Core Study)
Participants received perampanel 2 mg per day and up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to a target dose range of 8 to 12 mg per day.
Perampanel
2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.
Placebo (Core Study)
Participants received matching placebo tablets once a day (6 tablets of placebo).
Placebo
Matching Placebo taken once daily.
Perampanel (Extension Phase)
During the Extension Phase, participants previously assigned to perampanel arm (Core Study) continued taking study medication at the dose achieved at the end of the Core Study once daily. Participants previously assigned to a placebo arm (Core Study) started perampanel dose at 2 mg/day and up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments up to a maximum dose of 12 mg/day.
Perampanel
2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perampanel
2 mg titrated up to 8-12 mg maximum; taken once daily.
Placebo
Matching Placebo taken once daily.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Understand the requirements of the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) System tests and able to perform the tests appropriately at Visit 1.
3. Male or female, 12 to less than 18 years of age at the time of consent/assent
4. Had a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy's (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981).
5. Diagnosis was established at least 6 months prior to Visit 1, by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG) that was consistent with localization-related epilepsy; normal interictal EEGs were allowed provided that the subject met the other diagnosis criterion (ie, clinical history).
6. Had a brain imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] scan or computed tomography \[CT\]) within the 5 years prior to Visit 1 that ruled out a progressive cause of epilepsy.
7. Had at least 1 partial-onset seizure during the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 despite a stable regimen of 1 to 3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
8. Were currently being treated with stable doses of 1-3 AEDs. Only 1 inducer AED (either carbamazepine or phenytoin) out of the maximum of 3 AEDs was allowed.
9. Were on a stable dose of the same concomitant AED(s) for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1; in the case where a new AED regimen was initiated for a subject, the dose must have been stable for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1.
10. Female subjects of childbearing potential must had a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at Visit 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomization at Visit 2. Female subjects of period of at least 60 days following administration of the last dose of study medication to commit to the consistent and correct use of a medically acceptable method of birth control (e.g., a double-barrier method \[condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide\]). Abstinence was considered an acceptable method of contraception on a case by case basis upon prior approval by the Medical Monitor.
11. Had an intelligence quotient (IQ) of greater than or equal to 70, using the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition (KBIT-2).
12. Provided written informed consent signed by the legal guardian and a written assent from the subject prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures.
Extension Phase:
Had completed all scheduled visits up to and including Visit 8 in the Core Study Randomization Phase.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Had current or a history of pseudo-seizures (psychogenic non-epileptic seizures \[PNES\]) within approximately 5 years prior to Visit 1.
3. Had a diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
4. Had seizure clusters where individual seizures could not be counted.
5. Had a history of status epilepticus that required hospitalization during the 12 months prior to the Visit 1.
6. Had an unstable psychiatric diagnosis that could confound the investigator's ability to conduct the study or that could prevent completion of the protocol specified tests (e.g., significant suicide risk, including suicidal behavior and ideation 6 months prior to Visit 1, current psychotic disorder, or acute mania).
7. Had any concomitant illnesses/co-morbidities (e.g., autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder \[ADHD\]) at Visit 1 that could severely affect cognitive function during the course of the study.
8. Had previously participated in a clinical trial involving perampanel.
9. Had chronically or routinely use benzodiazepines and who have not discontinued the use at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
12 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eisai Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Haichen Yang, M.D., M.A.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Study Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Gibbsboro, New Jersey, United States
Akron, Ohio, United States
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Dallas, Texas, United States
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Brussels, , Belgium
Leuven, , Belgium
Ottignies, , Belgium
Ostrava, , Czechia
Budapest, , Hungary
Debrecen, , Hungary
Miskolc, , Hungary
Bangalore, , India
Hyderabad, , India
Mangalore, , India
Nagpur, , India
New Delhi, , India
Pune, , India
Secunderabad, , India
Daugavpils, , Latvia
Riga, , Latvia
Valmiera, , Latvia
Gdansk, , Poland
Poznan, , Poland
Daegu, , South Korea
Seoul, , South Korea
Madrid, Madrid, Communidad de, Spain
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Bangkok, , Thailand
Nonthaburi, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bresnahan R, Hill RA, Wang J. Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010961.pub2.
Pina-Garza JE, Lagae L, Villanueva V, Renfroe JB, Laurenza A, Williams B, Kumar D, Meador KJ. Long-term effects of adjunctive perampanel on cognition in adolescents with partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Meador KJ, Yang H, Pina-Garza JE, Laurenza A, Kumar D, Wesnes KA. Cognitive effects of adjunctive perampanel for partial-onset seizures: A randomized trial. Epilepsia. 2016 Feb;57(2):243-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13279. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E2007-G000-235
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.