Validation of Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) to Measure Renal Resistive Index and to Predict Renal Injury
NCT ID: NCT01151774
Last Updated: 2016-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-05-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimised Procedure in Patients With NSTEMI and CKD
NCT02543177
Kidney Disease and Ultrasound Imaging
NCT02201537
Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography With CT FFR in Kidney Transplantation Candidates
NCT03248674
Effects of Renal Transplantation on Uraemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT03892343
Multiparametric MRI for Assessment of Changes of Renal Hemodynamics After Fistula Closure in Kidney Transplant Patients
NCT05015231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are few studies that have assessed renal blood flow using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Yang et al. examined the left renal artery of 60 patients using TEE during cardiac surgery and evaluated the feasibility of using TEE as a method to measure renal blood flow intraoperatively. Although they were only able to include 60% of the subjects due to technical difficulties, they did demonstrate less than 10% variability between measurements and therefore good reproducibility using TEE.
Renal blood flow may not be the best method to predict sufficient renal perfusion. Renal autoregulation is not preserved under general anesthesia even with the maintenance of adequate mean arterial blood pressure and cardiac output. Renal blood flow is further worsened by hemodilution and hypothermia. In addition, due to its pulsatile nature, the diameters of the renal arteries vary during the cardiac cycle and are a source of calculation error when determining renal blood flow as a function of renal blood velocity and arterial diameter.
Renal resistive index (RI) is a measure of intrarenal hemodynamics that is calculated using the blood flow velocities of segmental or intrarenal vessels and correlates with renal blood flow and renovascular resistance. The renal artery is not used because the flow varies and is inconsistent between systole and diastole. RI becomes elevated in pathological conditions and is associated with increasing creatinine, renal injury and dysfunction. As blood flow and creatinine clearance decrease through the renal vasculature, the resistive index increases. Resistive index may be a better gauge of renal dysfunction rather than renal blood flow because it is easier to assess and less dependent on obtaining a Doppler beam view that is oriented perfectly parallel to the blood flow. Because RI is a ratio of the renal blood flow velocities \[RI = (peak systolic velocity - peak end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity\], the margin of error created by non-parallel Doppler beams cancels out.
Traditionally, resistive index is obtained by transabdominal Doppler ultrasonography (USG) although there have been transesophageal studies that have used RI as a secondary endpoint when examining renal blood flow. There is currently no technique that routinely uses TEE to intraoperatively monitor resistive index as a determination of adequate renal blood perfusion and an indication of renal compromise.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects with no contraindications to use of TEE or transabdominal doppler ultrasonography
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a contraindication to use of TEE i.e.esophageal stricture, esophageal diverticulum, esophageal/gastric tumor, recent esophageal/gastric surgery or radiation to the chest
* Patients with a contraindication to use of transabdominal doppler ultrasonography
* Patients who are pregnant
* patients with esophageal varices
* Patient with bleeding disorders
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas Jackson, MD, JD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMDNJ-NJMS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0120100024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.