Clinical Evaluation Of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses And A Monthly Replacement Lens
NCT ID: NCT01151371
Last Updated: 2018-06-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
452 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-01
2010-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multi-Center 2-Week Clinical Evaluation of Three Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
NCT01244516
Clinical Evaluation of Two Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
NCT01561560
Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
NCT02097030
Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in a Population of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wearers
NCT01233076
Short-Term Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
NCT03139578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
narafilcon B daily disposable 4 weeks
narafilcon B soft contact lenses worn daily on a daily disposable/replacement schedule, for 4 weeks
narafilcon B contact lens
Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
nelfilcon A daily disponsable 1 week
nelfilcon A soft contact lenses worn daily on a daily disposable/replacement schedule, for 1 week
nelfilcon A contact lens
Conventional Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
lotrafilcon B daily wear, monthly replacement, 4-weeks
lotrafilcon B soft contact lenses worn daily on a 1-month replacement schedule, for 4 weeks
lotrafilcon B contact lens
Silicone Hydrogel Monthly Replacement Contact Lenses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
narafilcon B contact lens
Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
nelfilcon A contact lens
Conventional Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
lotrafilcon B contact lens
Silicone Hydrogel Monthly Replacement Contact Lenses
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sign Written Informed Consent and investigator to record this on Case Report Form (See separate document).
* Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set out in the protocol.
* Own a cell phone and be willing to receive text messages during the day.
* Be an existing successful daily wear soft contact lens. For the purposes of this study this means wearing lenses for at least 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for the last month.
* No extended wear in the last 3 months.
* Subjective refraction must result in a vertexed spherical contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -6.00D.
* Have refractive astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00D in both eyes.
* Achieve visual acuity of 6/9 (20/30) or better in each eye.
* Require a visual correction in both eyes (no monofit or monovision allowed).
* Does not require presbyopic correction (i.e. Not using any presbyopic correction and measured add power of less than +1.00D).
* Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
* No amblyopia.
* No evidence of lid abnormality or infection (including blepharitis/meibomitis).
* No conjunctival abnormality or infection.
* No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities).
* No other active ocular disease.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal stromal haze, corneal vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
* Clinically significant corneal staining (Grade 3 in more than one corneal region per eye).
* Requires presbyopic correction (i.e. Not using any presbyopic correction and measured add power of less than +1.00D).
* Has had refractive surgery.
* Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrolment for this study.
* Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
* Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
* Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
* PMMA(polymethyl methacrylate), hybrid or RGP(rigid gas permeable) lens wear in the previous 8 weeks.
Does not require presbyopic correction (i.e. Not using any presbyopic correction and measured add power of less than +1.00D).
* Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear.
* Diabetic.
* Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus)).
* History of chronic eye disease (e.g. glaucoma or ARMD (age related macular degeneration)).
* Pregnancy, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment.
* Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 30 days.
18 Years
39 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Visioncare Research Ltd.
OTHER
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brea, California, United States
Canoga Park, California, United States
Corona, California, United States
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Mishawaka, Indiana, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Blue Springs, Missouri, United States
Independence, Missouri, United States
Lake Ozark, Missouri, United States
New York, New York, United States
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Chagrin Falls, Ohio, United States
North Olmsted, Ohio, United States
Warren, Ohio, United States
Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
Brentwood, Tennessee, United States
Tyler, Texas, United States
Tyler, Texas, United States
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CR-0917
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.