Multi-Center 2-Week Clinical Evaluation of Three Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

NCT ID: NCT01244516

Last Updated: 2018-06-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

540 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-01

Study Completion Date

2010-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel contact lenses over a 2 week period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

galyfilcon A

Subjects that were randomized to receive the galyfilcon A lens with a base curve of 8.30 throughout the entire course of the study.

Group Type OTHER

galyfilcon A, BC 8.30

Intervention Type DEVICE

galyfilcon A, BC 8.30 soft contact lens

lotrafilcon B

Subjects that were randomized to wear lotrafilcon B lens throughout the course of the study.

Group Type OTHER

lotrafilcon B, BC 8.60

Intervention Type DEVICE

lotrafilcon B, BC 8.60 soft contact lens

comfilcon A

Subjects that were randomized to wear comfilcon A lens throughout the course of the study.

Group Type OTHER

comfilcon A, BC 8.60

Intervention Type DEVICE

comfilcon A, BC 8.60 soft contact lens

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

galyfilcon A, BC 8.30

galyfilcon A, BC 8.30 soft contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

lotrafilcon B, BC 8.60

lotrafilcon B, BC 8.60 soft contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

comfilcon A, BC 8.60

comfilcon A, BC 8.60 soft contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be no less than 18 and no more than 39 years of age.
* Sign Written Informed Consent and investigator to record this on Case Report Form.
* Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set out in the protocol.
* Be an existing successful daily wear soft contact lens wearer. For the purposes of this study this means wearing lenses for at least 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for the last month.
* No extended wear in the last 3 months.
* Subjective refraction must result in a vertex corrected spherical contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -6.00 diopters.
* Have refractive astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00 diopters (D) in both eyes.
* Achieve visual acuity of 6/9 (20/30) or better in each eye.
* Require a visual correction in both eyes (no monovision allowed).
* Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having: no amblyopia, no evidence of lid abnormality or infection (including blepharitis/meibomitis), no conjunctival abnormality or infection, no clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities), no other active ocular disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* Requires concurrent ocular medication.
* Clinically significant corneal stromal haze, corneal vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
* Clinically significant corneal staining
* Requires presbyopic correction (i.e. Not using any presbyopic correction and measured add power of less than +1.00 diopters).
* Has had refractive surgery.
* Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrollment for this study.
* Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
* Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
* Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
* Hard, hybrid or Rigid Gas Permeable lens wear in the previous 8 weeks.
* Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear.
* Diabetic.
* Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease \[e.g., Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)\].
* History of chronic eye disease (e.g. glaucoma or Age Related Macular Degeneration).
* Pregnancy, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrollment.
* Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

39 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brea, California, United States

Site Status

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

Cupertino, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mishawaka, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Pittsburg, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Independence, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Raytown, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Closter, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Olmsted, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Powell, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Chamberlain, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Bartlett, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Brentwood, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CR-201007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.