Propofol Versus Midazolam for Upper Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients

NCT ID: NCT01141036

Last Updated: 2010-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Upper GI endoscopy is often performed in patients with chronic liver disease to screen for esophageal and gastric varices. The purpose of this study is to compare propofol to midazolam for sedation in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background : Upper GI endoscopy is often performed in patients with chronic liver disease to screen for esophageal and gastric varices. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare propofol to midazolam for sedation in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. Methods: 60 outpatients who has known chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh class A or B) (cirrhosis) and are undergoing variceal screening will be randomized to receive propofol or midazolam for sedation. Administration of sedation was performed by a anesthesist. Outcome measures studied are induction and recovery times, efficacy and safety of sedation, patient satisfaction, and return to baseline function and subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (number connection test), and saturation of oxygen. expected results: The mean time to achieve adequate sedation will be shorter for for the propofol group in comparison to midazolam group. The level of sedation achieved by the propofol group will be greater. Time to full recovery will be faster in the propofol group. Propofol do not exacerbate subclinical hepatic encephalopathy as compared to midazolam. patients receiving propofol will express greater overall mean satisfaction with the quality of their sedation at the time of discharge. Conclusions: Propofol sedation is expected not to exacerbate subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cirrhosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

propofol

propofol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol will be initiated with a 30-50 mg i.v. bolus followed by repeated 10-20 mg doses at variable intervals (approximately 15 s, at the discretion of the endoscopist/nurse) until an appropriate level of sedation will be achieved.

Midazolam

Midazolam

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam (0.5-1.0 mg) will be administered in a similar fashion with incremental dosing at intervals of approximately 1-3 min until a level of sedation will be achieved

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

propofol

Propofol will be initiated with a 30-50 mg i.v. bolus followed by repeated 10-20 mg doses at variable intervals (approximately 15 s, at the discretion of the endoscopist/nurse) until an appropriate level of sedation will be achieved.

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

Midazolam (0.5-1.0 mg) will be administered in a similar fashion with incremental dosing at intervals of approximately 1-3 min until a level of sedation will be achieved

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Known chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh class A or B) who presented for upper GI endoscopy for routine variceal screening.
* The diagnosis of liver disease will be based on available past history, serological testing, radiological imaging, and liver histology when available.
* Staging of cirrhosis will be determined by MELD score and by Child-Pugh score . All patients will complete a standard preprocedure history and physical examination to establish current degree of encephalopathy and ascites.

Exclusion Criteria

* known allergy or adverse reaction to sedative or component thereof
* patients with known significant respiratory disease or airway abnormality)
* active neurological impairment including clinically detectable hepatic encephalopathy
* advanced or decompensated liver disease ( CP score \>10, MELD \>24) (Child-Pugh class C)
* active alcohol consumption or illicit drug abuse
* active prescription for sedation or narcotics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ziv Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ziv medical center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ziv medical center liver unit

Safed, Israel, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

006-08ziv

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

006-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy
NCT04807101 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Sedation in Patients Undergoing GIT Endoscopy
NCT05880459 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1