Patient Satisfaction and Safety With Propofol Based Sedation With or Without Fentanyl for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03803449

Last Updated: 2019-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient satisfaction and safety with propofol based sedation with or without fentanyl for gastrointestinal endoscopy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study divide patients into two groups, one will be given propofol midazolam and fentanyl; another group was given propofol with midazolam without fentanyl; to observe two groups of patients blood pressure, body movement, and propofol dosage , and the difference in operator satisfaction, and how many people need to give fentanyl again; and two groups of patients after the operation of the reaction, if there are dizziness, nausea, and other adverse reactions; finally, the differences of these two schemes in different populations were analyzed, and the rationalization and individualized medication will be put forward.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Satisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are randomly assigned to group A or B. Participants of group A are given propofol midazolam and fentanyl; while participants of group B are given propofol with midazolam without fentany
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Participants are given standard regimen: 50-200mg propofol and 1 mg midazolam

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

50-200mg propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 50-200mg propofol.

1 mg midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 1 mg midazolam.

Fentanyl group

Participants are given intervention regimen: 50ug fentanyl, plus 50-200mg propofol and 1 mg midazolam.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

50-200mg propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 50-200mg propofol.

50ug fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

participants in fentanyl group are given intervention regimen: 50ug fentanyl.

1 mg midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 1 mg midazolam.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

50-200mg propofol

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 50-200mg propofol.

Intervention Type DRUG

50ug fentanyl

participants in fentanyl group are given intervention regimen: 50ug fentanyl.

Intervention Type DRUG

1 mg midazolam

participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 1 mg midazolam.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Jingan, J20110055 Yichang, H42022076 Liyuexi, H10980025

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 or older
* Patients scheduled for an outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy by the principal investigator.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of colorectal surgery
* Patients with ASA class 4 or 5,
* Patients with pre-existing hypoxaemia (SpO2\<90%),
* Patients with hypotension (SBP\<90mmHg)
* Patients with bradycardia (HR\<50 bpm)
* patients with severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance\<30 ml/min)
* patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure\>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure\>100 mm Hg)
* patients with pregnancy or lactation
* Patients hemodynamically unstable
* Patients unable to give informed consent
* Patients with a history of drug allergies;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shandong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanqing Li

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

yanqing li, Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

jing liu

Role: CONTACT

+86-18560083755

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018SDU-QILU-069

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.