MedDataX Logo

Comparison of Efficacy of Anesthesia Administered by Endoscopist or Anesthesiologist on Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03607110

Last Updated: 2018-07-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-01

Study Completion Date

2018-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In sedation applications performed by an endoscopist or anesthetist during colonoscopy, it was investigated whether there were differences in pain levels evaluated by VAS (Visuel analog scale), patient satisfaction, duration of procedure and side effects

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gastrointestinal endoscopes are an invasive and unpleasant procedure that is increasingly being performed worldwide (1). Colonoscopy; is one of the endoscopic procedures that can be used to diagnose and treat large intestine and cause pain and excessive discomfort in the patient (2). For this reason, intravenous (iv) sedative agents are used in endoscopy centers where endoscopy will be performed. However, side effects such as hypoxia and hypotension, which are usually dose-dependent, caused by these sedative agents, play an important role among risk factors associated with colonoscopy (3). For this reason, the use of propofol as an anesthetic is prohibited in some countries, which is a commonly used agent for sedation. However, the presence of an anesthetist during each endoscopy procedure is difficult because there are not enough anesthetists. This application is also more costly. For this reason, studies have been carried out during the gastrointestinal endoscopy when sedation is delivered by someone other than the anesthetist (4). For this purpose, several studies comparing patient-controlled sedation or sedation applied by an endoscopist to sedation performed by anesthesiologist were performed (4, 5). Investigators aimed to investigate whether there is any difference between the two groups in terms of pain levels assessed by VAS (Visuel analog scale) and patient satisfaction by comparing sedation protocols applied by endoscopist or anesthesist during colonoscopy in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy Ketamine Fentanyl

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ketamine

ketamine used

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

sedation drugs

patient control analgesia

Intervention Type DEVICE

patient control analgesia

fentanyl

fentanyl used

fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

sedation drugs

patient control analgesia

Intervention Type DEVICE

patient control analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketamine

sedation drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

fentanyl

sedation drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

patient control analgesia

patient control analgesia

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who accept the method and will undergo elective colonoscopy
* ASA I-II group
* Patients with the ability to perform VAS scoring

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who do not accept the method
* ASA III-IV-V group of patients with uncontrolled chronic disease (such as uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus)
* Patients with severe respiratory failure and cardiovascular disease
* Patients with liver and kidney failure
* Patients with long-term analgesic, opioid, sedative use history - Patients who are known to be hypersensitive to study medications, eggs,
* Those who are of pregnancy or pregnancy and those who are in breastfeeding period
* Those with antipsychotic or antidepressant medication usage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Selda KAYAALTI

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Selda KAYAALTI

Anesthesia and Reanimation Specialist

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Develi Hatice Muammer Kocatürk Devlet Hastanesi

Develi, Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ferreira AO, Cravo M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):102-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25685266 (View on PubMed)

Dal H., S. İzdeş, E. Kesimci, et al. Kolonoskopide sedasyon için propofolün aralıklı bolus veya hedef kontrollü infüzyon yöntemiyle uygulanmasının karşılaştırılması, Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi, 2011; 39(3): 134-142

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lee DW, Chan AC, Sze TS, Ko CW, Poon CM, Chan KC, Sin KS, Chung SC. Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Nov;56(5):629-32. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.128919.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12397267 (View on PubMed)

Poincloux L, Laquiere A, Bazin JE, Monzy F, Artigues F, Bonny C, Abergel A, Dapoigny M, Bommelaer G. A randomized controlled trial of endoscopist vs. anaesthetist-administered sedation for colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jul;43(7):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450542 (View on PubMed)

Crepeau T, Poincloux L, Bonny C, Lighetto S, Jaffeux P, Artigue F, Walleckx P, Bazin JE, Dapoigny M, Bommelaer G. Significance of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy. Results from a prospective randomized controlled study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005 Nov;29(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)82172-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16505753 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/94

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id