Comparative Study of Clinical Endpoint in DMD: Handheld Myometry (HHM) Versus CINRG Quantitative Measurement System (CQMS)

NCT ID: NCT01125709

Last Updated: 2013-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the proposed research is to compare two commonly used pediatric strength testing measures: handheld myometry (HHM) and CINRG Quantitative Measurement System (CQMS), with the goal of identifying a sensitive and valid tool for measuring muscle strength in children with DMD. The data obtained from this study will be used to make recommendations for strength measurement endpoints in prospective muscular dystrophy trials and provide more reliable and accurate recommendations in the clinic for strength assessment. This study will be performed at six participating sites in the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group (CINRG).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We propose to compare the reliability of CQMS vs. HHM in the DMD population. The importance of this study is to be able to compare the results of clinical trials done by different networks using distinct strength endpoints. If results indicate a distinct difference in reliability of one tool over the other, a standardized tool could be established for research groups throughout the world to interpret strength in the context of clinical trials. If the results indicate minor differences then it would be possible to interpret and compare/contrast strength measurements used in different studies.

Understanding the relationship between the HHM vs CQMS will help us examine other surrogate measures capable of predicting functionality that are based on strength measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants must confirm:

1. No Surgical procedures were performed ≤ 8 weeks before study procedures.
2. No musculoskeletal injuries were experienced ≤ 8 weeks before study procedures.
3. Investigator assessment that patient or parent/legal guardian are not willing or able to comply with study procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Muscular Dystrophy Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's National Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sydney Children's Hospitals Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Serena Onlus - Centro Clinico NeMO Milano

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carolinas Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Children's National Medical Center, Children's Research Institute

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tina T Duong, MPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's National Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Washington University - St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Royal Children's Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Centro Clinico Nemo

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Italy

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.cinrgresearch.org

CINRG website where all current and completed protocols are listed.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CNMC0609

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CIMT and taVNS for Hemiplegia in Infants
NCT05101707 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1