Evaluation of a Tongue Operated Assistive Technology for Individuals With Severe Paralysis
NCT ID: NCT01124292
Last Updated: 2013-09-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-31
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
TDS consists of a magnetic tracer, the size of a lentil, attached to the tongue by gluing, implantation, or piercing. The tracer generates a magnetic field inside and around the mouth that is detected by an array of magnetic sensors mounted on a wireless headset. Tongue-movement-induced changes in the magnetic field are sent wirelessly to an ultra-mobile computer or smartphone, carried by the user, which processes and translates every tongue motion to a particular user-defined function.
Once an individual with disability is "enabled" to access a computing device, he/she can nearly do everything that an able-bodied individual can do with that device. This includes communicating, education, training, entertainment, and controlling other devices such as powered wheelchairs (PWC), assistive robotic manipulators, and other home/office appliances on a local area network (LAN). Even the individual's own natural or prosthetic limbs can be manipulated to move by functional electrical stimulation (FES).
This study was intended to evaluate the TDS by the ultimate intended users, individuals with severe disabilities, who are the best experts for indicating the benefits and possible shortcomings of any new ANT. Our goal is to assess the acceptability and usability of the TDS for various tasks that are important in daily life such as computer access, wheeled mobility, and environmental control.
Three groups of subjects were recruited:
Group-A: Able-bodied subjects who already have tongue piercing
Group-B: Able-bodied subjects who wanted to receive tongue piercing as part of this trial
Group-C: Subjects with high-level disability, who wanted to receive tongue piercing as part of this trial
Each group of subjects participated in a battery of tasks that quantitatively measures their performance in accessing computers and driving wheelchairs using the TDS.
We also devised acceptable procedures for receiving a magnetic tongue piercing (required in order to use the TDS), and assess its potential safety issues.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Able-bodied subject with piercing
Able-bodied subjects who already have tongue piercing.
Usability assessment
Computer access: Subjects wear the TDS and get trained. Then they sit 1.5 m from a 22" LCD monitor. Then they use TDS to conduct several tasks using their tongues, such as clicking on target objects and navigating through on-screen maze, while the computer registers their tongue commands and measures their performance.
Wheelchair control: Subjects wear the TDS and use it to drive an electrically powered wheelchair through an obstacle course using their tongues. The operator measured the time it takes for the subjects to drive through the course as well as the number of collisions.
Able-bodied subject without piercing
Able-bodied subjects who willing to receive a tongue piercing for this study.
Tongue Piercing
Subjects brush their teeth, and then swish and spit with chlorhexidine mouthwash for 30-60s. Subjects would be placed in a semirecumbent position in a procedure chair. After marking the piercing site using a sterilized surgical marking pen the protruded tongue would be pierced. Anesthesia may be used during the piercing at the discretion of the operator and the subject. A sterilized titanium or surgical grade stainless steel piercing tongue stud would be placed in an appropriate position on the tongue to minimize complications from the piercing but also facilitate good functionality of the TDS.
Usability assessment
Computer access: Subjects wear the TDS and get trained. Then they sit 1.5 m from a 22" LCD monitor. Then they use TDS to conduct several tasks using their tongues, such as clicking on target objects and navigating through on-screen maze, while the computer registers their tongue commands and measures their performance.
Wheelchair control: Subjects wear the TDS and use it to drive an electrically powered wheelchair through an obstacle course using their tongues. The operator measured the time it takes for the subjects to drive through the course as well as the number of collisions.
Subjects with spinal cord injury
Persons with mobility limitations requiring power wheel chair, able to move tongue, able to follow simple commands, and have some experience with computers. All participants willingly received a mid-line tongue piercing.
Tongue Piercing
Subjects brush their teeth, and then swish and spit with chlorhexidine mouthwash for 30-60s. Subjects would be placed in a semirecumbent position in a procedure chair. After marking the piercing site using a sterilized surgical marking pen the protruded tongue would be pierced. Anesthesia may be used during the piercing at the discretion of the operator and the subject. A sterilized titanium or surgical grade stainless steel piercing tongue stud would be placed in an appropriate position on the tongue to minimize complications from the piercing but also facilitate good functionality of the TDS.
Usability assessment
Computer access: Subjects wear the TDS and get trained. Then they sit 1.5 m from a 22" LCD monitor. Then they use TDS to conduct several tasks using their tongues, such as clicking on target objects and navigating through on-screen maze, while the computer registers their tongue commands and measures their performance.
Wheelchair control: Subjects wear the TDS and use it to drive an electrically powered wheelchair through an obstacle course using their tongues. The operator measured the time it takes for the subjects to drive through the course as well as the number of collisions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tongue Piercing
Subjects brush their teeth, and then swish and spit with chlorhexidine mouthwash for 30-60s. Subjects would be placed in a semirecumbent position in a procedure chair. After marking the piercing site using a sterilized surgical marking pen the protruded tongue would be pierced. Anesthesia may be used during the piercing at the discretion of the operator and the subject. A sterilized titanium or surgical grade stainless steel piercing tongue stud would be placed in an appropriate position on the tongue to minimize complications from the piercing but also facilitate good functionality of the TDS.
Usability assessment
Computer access: Subjects wear the TDS and get trained. Then they sit 1.5 m from a 22" LCD monitor. Then they use TDS to conduct several tasks using their tongues, such as clicking on target objects and navigating through on-screen maze, while the computer registers their tongue commands and measures their performance.
Wheelchair control: Subjects wear the TDS and use it to drive an electrically powered wheelchair through an obstacle course using their tongues. The operator measured the time it takes for the subjects to drive through the course as well as the number of collisions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-65
* Able-bodied with a tongue piercing Must have had the tongue piercing for at least 3 months and still be using it
* Piercing is located in the midline of the tongue between the tip and the frenulum, almost in the center of the mouth
* Can understand and speak English
* Have some experience in using computers
Inclusion group-B:
* Age 18-65
* No overt sign of disability or neurological disease
* Do not have a tongue piercing, but are willing to receive one in the midline between the tip and lingual frenulum, almost in the center of the mouth
* Can understand and speak English
* Have some experience in using computers
Inclusion group-C:
* Age 18-65
* Have mobility limitations requiring a power wheel chair and also have inadequate upper limb strength to manage a hand or arm control i.e. have severe motor disabilities and need alternative control
* Either using or suitable for an alternative control
* Able to follow simple commands
* Sitting tolerance of at least 4 hours (each experiment session will be no more than 4 hours and the researcher follows the standard pressure relief schedule)
* Have some experience in using computers
* Be able to move the tongue
* Be able to speak or respond to questions by themselves or through an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device
* Be able to give consent
* Be able to have a caregiver, who can respond immediately in the event of an emergency, available during the period of the study.
* Can understand and speak English
* Have or are willing to receive a tongue piercing in the midline between the tip and the lingual frenulum, almost in the center of the mouth
Exclusion Criteria
* Original tongue piercing and the insertion site is too wide.
* Ongoing difficulties with current tongue jewelry
* Tongue piercing not located in the correct position on the tongue
* No experience with computers or illiterate
* Severe hearing or visual deficiency or impairing neurological disease
* Have any ongoing systemic condition deemed to be relevant by the local investigator-clinician
* Is pregnant
* Cognitive impairment so that unable to follow simple commands
* Wounds or ulcers on the head or in the mouth or on the tongue
* Using sensitive electronic implantable medical device such as a deep brain stimulator or a pacemaker in the upper body
* Intra-oral space occupying lesion or orthodontic appliance
* Unable to come to GT or RIC on a regular basis during the study-period
* Miss more than two appointments without prior notification
* Unable to comply with any of the procedures in the protocol
Exclusion Group-B:
* Tongue too short or the tongue web too far extended, making tongue piercing difficult
* Have a torus mandibularis or palatini or other space-occupying intra-oral lesion or orthodontic appliance
* No experience with computers or illiterate
* Severe hearing or visual deficiency or impairing neurological disease
* Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, artificial heart valve, congenital heart disease
* On an immunosuppressive medication or otherwise immunocompromised
* Diabetic or have any other ongoing systemic condition deemed to be relevant by the local investigator-clinician
* Ongoing neoplastic disease other than localized basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Have known asthma, physical urticaria or angioedema
* Have any current infectious condition
* Cognitive impairment to the extent that cannot follow simple commands
* Is pregnant
* Wounds or ulcers on the head or in the mouth or on the tongue
* Using sensitive electronic implantable medical device such as a deep brain stimulator or a pacemaker in the upper body
* Space occupying orthodontic appliances
* Unable to come SCA or NU for a tongue piercing, 72 hour visit and to GTB or RIC on a regular basis during the study-period
* Miss more than two appointments without prior notification
* Unable to comply with any of the procedures in the protocol
Exclusion Group-C:
* Unable to move the tongue
* Have a large object or tube in the mouth blocking tongue motion
* Tongue or tongue frenulum short or the tongue frenulum extended far forward, making tongue piercing difficult
* Have a torus mandibularis or palatini or other space-occupying intra-oral lesion or orthodontic appliance
* Medically or mentally unstable
* Known sensitivity or allergy to an adhesive
* Using a halo brace or facial pads that would block the use of a headset or headgear
* Cognitive impairment to the extent that the subject cannot follow simple commands
* Severe hearing or visual deficiency
* Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, artificial heart valve, congenital heart disease
* On any form of anticoagulation including but not limited to warfarin, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, aspirin, aspirin-containing products, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications that the subject's supervising attending physician states cannot be stopped during the pre-piercing period which may include not only the appropriate medication-specific washout period before the piercing but also up to 5 days after the procedure.
* On an immunosuppressive or otherwise immunocompromised
* Have a decubitus ulcer stage III or higher or a decubitus ulcer of any stage that is worsening.
* Diabetic or have any other ongoing systemic condition, as deemed to be relevant by the local investigator-clinician
* Ongoing neoplastic disease other than localized basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Have known asthma, physical urticaria or angioedema
* Have any current infectious condition
* Is pregnant
* No experience with computers or illiterate
* Using a sensitive electronic implantable medical device such as a deep brain stimulator or a pacemaker in the upper body
* Unable to sit for 4 hours with pressure relief
* Wounds or ulcers on the head or in the mouth or on the tongue
* No continuous access to a caregiver
* Unable to come to the SCA or NMH for a three day stay for tongue piercing and to SCA or RIC on a regular basis during the study-period
* Miss more than three appointments without prior notification
* Unable to comply with any of the procedures in the protocol
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
OTHER
Northwestern University
OTHER
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
OTHER
University of Arizona
OTHER
Georgia Institute of Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maysam Ghovanloo
Associate Processor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maysam Ghovanloo, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Georgia Institute of Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Shepherd Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huo X, Ghovanloo M. Evaluation of a wireless wearable tongue-computer interface by individuals with high-level spinal cord injuries. J Neural Eng. 2010 Apr;7(2):26008. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/2/026008. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Huo X, Ghovanloo M. Using unconstrained tongue motion as an alternative control mechanism for wheeled mobility. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009 Jun;56(6):1719-26. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2018632. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
Huo X, Wang J, Ghovanloo M. Introduction and preliminary evaluation of the Tongue Drive System: wireless tongue-operated assistive technology for people with little or no upper-limb function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(6):921-30. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.06.0096.
Huo X, Wang J, Ghovanloo M. A magneto-inductive sensor based wireless tongue-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008 Oct;16(5):497-504. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2003375.
Huo X, Ghovanloo M. Using speech recognition to enhance the Tongue Drive System functionality in computer access. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6393-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091578.
Yousefi B, Huo X, Veledar E, Ghovanloo M. Quantitative and comparative assessment of learning in a tongue-operated computer input device. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2011 Sep;15(5):747-57. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2158608. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
Yousefi B, Huo X, Kim J, Veledar E, Ghovanloo M. Quantitative and comparative assessment of learning in a tongue-operated computer input device--part II: navigation tasks. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012 Jul;16(4):633-43. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2191793. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
Kim J, Huo X, Minocha J, Holbrook J, Laumann A, Ghovanloo M. Evaluation of a smartphone platform as a wireless interface between tongue drive system and electric-powered wheelchairs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun;59(6):1787-96. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2194713. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Minocha JS, Holbrook JS, West DP, Ghovanloo M, Laumann AE. Development of a tongue-piercing method for use with assistive technology. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Apr;150(4):453-4. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.7165. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
CNN report on the first clinical trial of the Tongue Drive System at the Shepherd Center in 2009
Tongue Drive System featured on the Science Nation (the National Science Foundation online Magazine), showing a short video clip of the first clinical trial at the Shepherd Center in Atlanta.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H09240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id