Prospective Evaluation of Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI) in Conjunction With Phacoemulsification Surgery for Astigmatic Correction in Chinese Eyes
NCT ID: NCT01122992
Last Updated: 2010-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness and Safety of Limbal Relaxing Incisions for Correcting Post Phacoemulsification High Astigmatism
NCT06896357
Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Myopia Control
NCT05090592
Topography-guided LASIK Surgery
NCT03292419
Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism in Different Region Modes
NCT03299530
Asymptomatic Narrow Angles - Laser Iridotomy Study; Multicentric RCT
NCT00347178
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The limbal relaxing incisional technique involves placement of incisions corresponding to the steep meridian, thereby resulting in corneal flattening and reduction of astigmatic power. It is increasingly popular due to its advantages. LRI is simple to perform, very safe procedure in experienced hands, effective for astigmatic reduction of up to 4D, has rapid visual rehabilitation and is associated with very few visual complications due to the peripheral location of the incisions. Possible complications include globe weakening, corneal perforation, worsening of astigmatism, incorrect incisional placement and corneal hypoesthesia.
LRI technique and the practical nomograms has been described and made feasible by both James P Gills and Louis D Nichamin. Based on preoperatively measured astigmatic power and axis, these two nomograms recommend a systematic approach to the amount of surgical correction required.
The reason for the Nichamin nomogram being more frequently applied, can be attributed to a few inherent features. It accounts for the age of the patient as a surgical variability and recommends the use of paired arcuate limbal incisions measured in degrees of arc. Paired incisions enable symmetric corneal flattening at the steep meridian, whilst arcuate incisions are more physiological, thereby resulting in accurate astigmatic correction that is independent of corneal diameter. Nichamin has also implemented a modified Nichamin age and pachymetry-adjusted nomogram (otherwise known as 'NAPA' nomogram). It accounts for the patient's peripheral corneal thickness and adjusts the incisional depth accordingly to achieve 90% of corneal thickness.
Many studies have shown that LRI is an effective option for astigmatic correction in Caucasian eyes. Whether these results can be further extrapolated to apply to Chinese eyes are still largely uncertain. To date, there has not been a formal study conducted to evaluate this hypothesis. Moreover, there has been some anecdotal evidence suggesting less favorable postoperative outcome of LRI in Chinese eyes. The main objective of our study is thus to assess the utility and effectiveness of LRI in Chinese eyes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Limbal relaxing incision
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Only Chinese patients will be eligible for this study
* Presence of a pre-existing regular astigmatism ranging between -1.00 to -3.00D
* Informed consent obtained for both phacoemulsification surgery and LRI procedure
* Study subject is agreeable to comply with the postoperative follow-up regime stated
Exclusion Criteria
* Pre-existing pterygium
* Previous corneal / anterior segment surgery
* Pre-existing corneal scar
* Pre-existing corneal pathology eg keratoconus, Fuch's endothelial dystrophy, PUK, etc
* Pre-existing glaucoma
21 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore National Eye Centre
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Singapore National Eye Centre
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Han Chua, FRCS Ophthalmology
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore National Eye Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore National Eye Centre
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Muller-Jensen K, Fischer P, Siepe U. Limbal relaxing incisions to correct astigmatism in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 1999 Sep-Oct;15(5):586-9. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19990901-12.
Gills JP. Treating astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;13(1):2-6. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200202000-00002.
Budak K, Friedman NJ, Koch DD. Limbal relaxing incisions with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Apr;24(4):503-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80292-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R489/38/2006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.