Safety & Efficacy of the Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure (Philippines)
NCT ID: NCT04151550
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-25
2025-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety & Efficacy of the Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure (Taiwan)
NCT04151446
Safety & Efficacy of the Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure
NCT05068479
Safety and Efficacy of a New Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Treatment
NCT04698174
Corneal Refractive Therapy Design Comparison for -4 to -6 Diopter Treatment for Overnight Wear for Myopia
NCT05438615
A Comparison of Fellow Eyes Undergoing LASIK or PRK With a Wavefront-guided Excimer Laser Versus a Wavefront-optimized Excimer Laser
NCT01135719
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure is a treatment to restore visual and accommodative function in presbyopic patients. The subjects are bilaterally treated with the Laser Scleral Microporation procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AVG LSM Procedure
Ace Vision Group LSM procedure performed on both eyes.
Bilateral Laser Scleral Microporation procedure
Device: Laser Scleral Microporation
Partial depth scleral microporations with an Er:YAG laser in a predetermined pattern.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bilateral Laser Scleral Microporation procedure
Device: Laser Scleral Microporation
Partial depth scleral microporations with an Er:YAG laser in a predetermined pattern.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Willing and able to attend postoperative examinations per protocol schedule;
3. 48 years of age or greater, of either gender or any race;
4. Less than (\<) 1.00D of astigmatism in each eye, measured by manifest refraction;
5. Mean Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) of less than or equal to 0.50D for distance vision;
6. Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) is better than or equal to 20/40 (logMAR 0.30) in each eye, and a Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) is better than or equal to 20/25 (logMAR 0.10) in each eye;
7. Demonstrate stereopsis of 100 seconds of arc or better using a Stereo Fly test with near correction;
8. In good ocular health with the exception of presbyopia;
9. Presbyopia as demonstrated by:
1. Currently wearing reading glasses and/or bifocals with an ADD of +1.50D or more at 40cm in each eye; and
2. Reduced near visual acuity at 40cm when corrected for distance (DCNVA) of 20/50 (logMAR 0.40) or worse in each eye;
10. Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 11mmHg and ≤ 30 mmHg in each eye without IOP-lowering medication;
11. Less than or equal to (≤) 0.50D difference between the manifest refraction spherical equivalent and the cycloplegic refraction spherical equivalent;
12. If the subject has had Laser Vision Correction (LVC) within 1-2 years prior to the LSM procedure, stable distance refraction is present, defined as ≤ 0.50D variation of refraction in the 12 months prior to the LSM procedure. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) cannot vary more than 0.50D from current spectacles that are at least 12 months of age, or from a documented refraction at least 12 months prior to the preoperative baseline exam; if baseline data is available.
13. Completed a washout period of two weeks (14 days) prior to LSM procedure from prior treatment with:
a) With prior medical clearance: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), blood thinners, aspiring and other substances which may increase bleeding; b) Anti-oxidants, which could affect blood thinning: (i) Any antioxidant supplements (e.g., Vitamin E, Acai, Ocuvite, greater than 1000mg of Omega-3, etc.); (ii) Antioxidant food supplements, such as shitake mushroom, mushroom extract and oral antioxidants
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery, or expected to require retinal laser treatment or other ocular surgical intervention;
3. Presence of ocular pathology other than cataract such as:
1. Amblyopia or strabismus
2. Corneal abnormalities or disease
3. History of Dry Eye treatments/devices
4. Pupil abnormalities (e.g., corectopia, Adie's)
5. Capsule or zonular abnormalities
6. Intraocular inflammation
7. Retinal/macular disease or pathology
8. Glaucoma (any type)
4. History of prior ocular surgery, including:
1. Previous corneal surgery (e.g., penetrating keratoplasty, DSEAK/DSEK/DMEK, lamellar keratoplasty), except for LASIK, SMILE, EpiLASEK, or PRK;
2. Previous anterior or posterior chamber surgery (e.g., vitrectomy, laser iridotomy) with the exception of uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation;
3. Previous retinal surgery (e.g, retinal break, repair related to ocular trama or detachment, or pathology that is likely to require surgical intervention such as lattice degeneration.
5. Known pathology that may affect visual acuity and/or are predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level of 20/30 (logMAR 0.18) or worse (e.g., macular degeneration);
6. Keratoconus or keratoconus suspect with CDVA of less than (\<) 20/20 (logMAR 0.00) at distance;
7. Near visual acuity at 40cm equivalent to their distance vision with distance correction (i.e., no evident effect of reduced accommodative range);
8. Use of systemic or ocular medications that may affect vision (the use of any miotic or cycloplegic agent is specifically contraindicated);
9. Acute or chronic disease or illness that could increase the operative risk or confound the study outcome(s) (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised, connective tissue disease);
10. Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease;
11. Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in EITHER eye;
12. Undilatable pupil such that one cannot examine the periphery of the retina;
13. Functional eye preference, defined as phoria measuring over 15 prism diopters (PD) horizontally and/or over 2 PD vertically, any strabismus, or suppression.
14. History of scleral ectasia, scleritis, or episcleritis: or thin sclera \< 400 microns, as determined by taking the average of three measurements with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) pachymetry or ocular coherence tomography;
15. History of nuclear sclerosis LOCS III grade 2 or worse and/or other cataracts reducing CDVA or OSI \> 2.5;
16. Known allergies to study medications including topical steroids, antibiotics and NSAIDs;
17. Per Principal Investigator (PI) discretion
48 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ACE Vision Group, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mitchell Jackson, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ace Vision Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Asian Eye Institute
Makati City, , Philippines
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AVG-PHIL-2019-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.