Evaluation of Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) in U.S. Army Personnel, Substudy of: Initial Evaluation of Excimer Laser Keratorefractive Surgery in U.S. Army Personnel
NCT ID: NCT00412568
Last Updated: 2008-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-05-31
2008-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. evaluate the safety and efficacy of conventional PRK in U.S. Army personnel who have naturally occurring myopia with or without astigmatism.
2. compare the data from this control group to study groups undergoing wavefront guided PRK.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
PRK control group
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
vision correction with PRK
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
vision correction with PRK
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MSE) of up to 6.00 diopters (D) at the spectacle plane with refractive cylinder up to 3.00 D.
3. Manifest refraction and LADARWave™ refractions must be within 1.00 D.
4. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes.
5. Demonstrated refractive stability, confirmed by clinical records. Neither the spherical nor the cylindrical portion of the refraction may have changed more than 0.50D during the 12-month period immediately preceding the baseline examination, as confirmed by clinical records.
6. Soft contact lens users must have removed their lenses at least 2 weeks before baseline measurements. Hard contact lens users (PMMA or rigid gas permeable lenses) must have removed their lenses at least 4 weeks prior to baseline measurements and have 2 central keratometry readings and 2 manifest refractions taken at least 1 week apart that do not differ by more than 0.50 D in either meridian; mires should be regular.
7. Located in the greater Washington DC area for a 12-month period.
8. Consent of the subject's command (active duty) to participate in the study.
9. Access to transportation to meet follow-up requirements.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Concurrent topical or systemic medications that may impair healing, including corticosteroids, antimetabolites, isotretinoin (Accutane), amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone) and/or sumatripin (Imitrex).
3. Medical condition(s), which, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair healing, including but not limited to: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, and ocular herpes zoster or simplex.
4. Active ophthalmic disease, neovascularization of the cornea within 1mm of the intended ablation zone, or clinically significant lens opacity.
5. Evidence of glaucoma or an intraocular pressure greater than 22 mm Hg at baseline.
6. Evidence of keratoconus, corneal irregularity, or abnormal videokeratography in either eye.
7. History of recurrent erosions or epithelial basement dystrophy.
8. Patients with known sensitivity or inappropriate responsiveness to any of the medications used in the post-operative course.
9. Any physical or mental impairment that would preclude participation in any of the examinations.
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
FED
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
FED
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
KRAIG S. BOWER, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Center For Refractive Surgery
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WU #2335-99 (master protocol)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
WRAMC WU # 04-2335-99d
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id