Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-30
2024-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Synopsis of Study Design
The study consists of two phases:
1. A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
2. A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Photorefractive Keratectomy for Severe Anisometropia and Isoametropia Associated With Amblyopia
NCT03610997
Safety and Efficacy of a New Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Treatment
NCT04698174
A Safety and Effectiveness Study of PRK Using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE® EYE-Q Excimer Laser System
NCT01699087
Refractive Transepithelial Photo-keratectomy (T-PKR) in High Myopia
NCT04917562
Efficacy and Safety of Eyetronix Flicker Glasses to the Treatment of Anisometropic Amblyopia
NCT02970708
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
o Surgery will be performed within 60 days of randomization
* Non-surgical Control Group: patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgical Group
Participants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center. The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization. Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery.
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.
Excimer Laser System
Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.
Non-surgical Control Group
For participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit.
Patching 2 hours per day
Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.
Patching 2 hours per day
Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Excimer Laser System
Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:
* If age 3 to \<5 years, 20/80 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/80)
* If age 5 to \<8 years, 20/63 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/63)
* Note: For participants who require a re-test (as specified above), the better of the test and re-test acuities must meet the eligibility criteria for the amblyopic eye and will serve as the enrollment VA.
3. Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:
* If age 3 years, 20/50 or better
* If age 4 to 5 years, 20/40 or better
* If age 6 to 7 years, 20/32 or better
4. Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
5. Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):
* Refractive error in the amblyopic eye must be greater than the fellow eye.
* If the amblyopic eye is myopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between -3.00D and -12.00D, inclusive.
* If the amblyopic eye is hyperopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between +3.00D and +6.00D, inclusive, if \<=1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye; and between +3.00D and +5.00D, inclusive, if \>1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye.
* Astigmatism less than or equal to 3.50D in the amblyopic eye.
* SE refractive error in the fellow eye between -4.00D and +3.00D, inclusive, with no astigmatism limits.
* For participants 3 to \<5 years of age, at least 5.00D of SE anisometropic difference between the two eyes by cycloplegic refraction; for subjects 5 to \<8 years of age, at least 3.00D SE anisometropic difference
* No more than 3.00D of difference in cylinder power between the two eyes
* Target postoperative refractive error (if participant becomes eligible for randomization) must be achievable with PRK as defined in Table 3 and must be within 2.00D of the fellow eye.
6. Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
7. Corneal thickness \>500 microns (\>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
8. Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
9. IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
10. Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
11. Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
12. No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
13. Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
14. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
15. Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
16. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
3. Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
4. Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
5. Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:
* Corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, keratoconus or suspicion of keratoconus based upon family history, slit lamp exam, retinoscopy, or corneal topography (if able), recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, or corneal dystrophy)
* Established diagnosis of glaucoma
* Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong corneal epithelial healing
* History of significant eye rubbing or dry eye symptoms
6. History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
7. Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
3 Years
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
NETWORK
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Evelyn A Paysse, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Baylor College of Medicine
David K Wallace, MD, MPH
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Duke Eye Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ATS19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.