Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia

NCT ID: NCT03342235

Last Updated: 2020-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-30

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.

Synopsis of Study Design

The study consists of two phases:

1. A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
2. A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anisometropic Amblyopia Refractive Errors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* Surgical Group: treatment with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.

o Surgery will be performed within 60 days of randomization
* Non-surgical Control Group: patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical Group

Participants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center. The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization. Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.

Excimer Laser System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.

Non-surgical Control Group

For participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Patching 2 hours per day

Intervention Type OTHER

Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)

Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patching 2 hours per day

Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.

Intervention Type OTHER

Excimer Laser System

Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PRK Surgery Patching

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 3 to \<8 years
2. Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:

* If age 3 to \<5 years, 20/80 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/80)
* If age 5 to \<8 years, 20/63 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/63)
* Note: For participants who require a re-test (as specified above), the better of the test and re-test acuities must meet the eligibility criteria for the amblyopic eye and will serve as the enrollment VA.
3. Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:

* If age 3 years, 20/50 or better
* If age 4 to 5 years, 20/40 or better
* If age 6 to 7 years, 20/32 or better
4. Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
5. Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):

* Refractive error in the amblyopic eye must be greater than the fellow eye.
* If the amblyopic eye is myopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between -3.00D and -12.00D, inclusive.
* If the amblyopic eye is hyperopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between +3.00D and +6.00D, inclusive, if \<=1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye; and between +3.00D and +5.00D, inclusive, if \>1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye.
* Astigmatism less than or equal to 3.50D in the amblyopic eye.
* SE refractive error in the fellow eye between -4.00D and +3.00D, inclusive, with no astigmatism limits.
* For participants 3 to \<5 years of age, at least 5.00D of SE anisometropic difference between the two eyes by cycloplegic refraction; for subjects 5 to \<8 years of age, at least 3.00D SE anisometropic difference
* No more than 3.00D of difference in cylinder power between the two eyes
* Target postoperative refractive error (if participant becomes eligible for randomization) must be achievable with PRK as defined in Table 3 and must be within 2.00D of the fellow eye.
6. Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
7. Corneal thickness \>500 microns (\>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
8. Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
9. IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
10. Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
11. Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
12. No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
13. Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
14. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
15. Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
16. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
2. Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
3. Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
4. Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
5. Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:

* Corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, keratoconus or suspicion of keratoconus based upon family history, slit lamp exam, retinoscopy, or corneal topography (if able), recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, or corneal dystrophy)
* Established diagnosis of glaucoma
* Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong corneal epithelial healing
* History of significant eye rubbing or dry eye symptoms
6. History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
7. Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evelyn A Paysse, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Baylor College of Medicine

David K Wallace, MD, MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Duke Eye Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2U10EY011751

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

ATS19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Amblyopia (Lazy Eye) Treatment Study
NCT00001864 COMPLETED PHASE3