Impact of Blades Used for Scheduled Orotracheal Intubation on Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT ID: NCT01118533
Last Updated: 2016-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
712 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Consequently, the study hypothesis is an increase of both sore throat intensity and frequency with the plastic blades compared with the metal blades.
The primary purpose of the present study is to compare the impact of these two types of blades, metal versus plastic, on sore throat intensity and frequency following scheduled orotracheal intubation for general anesthesia
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room
NCT00876967
Out-of-Hospital Intubation With Metal Single Use Laryngoscope Blades
NCT00644722
Incidence of Sore Throat With Traditional Intubation Blades or Glidescope Blade
NCT02033564
Intubation with Different Angled Intubation Tubes Using C-macr D Blade Videolaringoscope;
NCT06011967
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized and single-blind controlled study
Material and Methods :
The obtaining of the Ethic Committee approval allows the enrolment of 712 patients scheduled for surgery performed under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Adult patients, 18 to 70 years-old, with grade I-II of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) status will be enrolled after clear information and obtaining, at the anesthesia visit, of the non-opposition to be enrolled in the trial.
At the anesthesia visit, the anesthesiologist will explain the purpose and protocol to the patients and then will propose them to participate to the study. The decision to be enrolled will be known at the pre-anesthesia visit, one day before the surgery. Therefore, the patients will have a delay between the anesthesia and pre-anesthesia visits to make a decision. The non-opposition to participate to the trial will be clearly mentioned in the medical file.
A randomization list will be established by a statistician. Informed and non-opposed patients will be allocated both a randomization number and a plastic or metal blade in the operating theatre via the Clean Web software.
The evaluation and measure of the primary outcome will be made in a single-blind way. The patients will evaluate the sore throat intensity being unaware of the type of blade used for the orotracheal intubation. An independent research assistant in each centre will collect data evaluated in both the operating room during the orotracheal intubation procedure and the post-operative period.
The duration of tracheal intubation will be defined as the time elapsing from the mouth insertion of the blade to the passage of the tube throughout the vocal cords announced by the operator. The intra-tracheal position of the tube will be confirmed by three squared cycles of capnography.
Protocol :
Anesthesia and monitoring:
Patients will be premedicated by hydroxyzine 1 mg kg-1 the previous evening and one hour before the transfer to the operating room.
The randomization is performed in the operating room just before the anesthesia induction.
The monitoring will be standard with:
* An electrocardiogram (lookout of cardiac rhythm modifications)
* A pulse oxymetry to lookout arterial oxygen saturation
* A non-invasive blood pressure monitoring
* A capnograph to lookout carbon dioxide elimination in the expired gas and to confirm the intra-tracheal position of the tube
* A gas analyser to control the concentration of administered halogenated volatile agents
* A neuromuscular blockade monitor to lookout the depth of the neuromuscular blockade required to perform tracheal intubation in optimal conditions. The monitoring will consist of stimulating the facial nerve 1 cm near the external eyelid corner by a train of four electric charges (30 mA). The muscular responses will be evaluated on the corrugator Supercilia by counting the number of contractions.
* A bispectral index (BIS) or entropy to monitor the hypnosis depth. The expected values will be 40-60 and 25-35, respectively.
* A manometer to control the tracheal tube cuff pressure Before anesthesia induction, patients will breathe 100% oxygen till expired oxygen concentration reach 90%. Intravenous anesthesia will be then performed with propofol (1.5-2.5 mg kg -1) as hypnotic, sufentanil (0.2 mcg kg-1) and atracurium (0.5 mg kg-1) as muscle relaxant. Cis-atracurium or vecuronium as middle acting muscle relaxant or SUNCCYNILCHOLINE as short acting muscle relaxant will be authorized. According to the randomization, the blade used for orotracheal intubation will be metal or plastic. The metal blade is reusable and the plastic blade is disposable. When the BIS or the entropy will reach 40-60 and 25-35, respectively, with efficient face mask ventilation (good thoracic amplitude following by capnography cycles), no response to the TOF at the corrugator Supercilia, the laryngoscopy will be performed according to the orotracheal intubation algorithm. Tracheal tube sizes will be 7 mm for female and 7.5 for males. Tracheal tube cuff will be standard.
After tracheal intubation, the anesthesia will be maintained with inhaled halogenated gas or intravenously. Inhaled gas will be moistened. Postoperative analgesia will be anticipated in the operating room with paracetamol 1 g, ketoprofen 100 mg and nefopam if necessary. In the absence of contraindication, the three analgesics will be administered during laparotomies. Wound and abdominal holes for laparoscopy will be infiltrated with ropivacaine. At the end of the surgery, the tracheal tube will be withdrawn according to the standard procedure recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society. Mouth secretions will be suctioned delicately. In the PACU, analgesia will be continued with according to a protocol adapted to the type of surgery. Morphine will be administered if pain VAS reaches 4/10. Pharyngeal and laryngeal morbidity evaluation will begin at the discharge of the PACU and will last 48 hours. If signs persist more than 48 hours, an ENT examination will be performed to make a diagnostic.
Statistics :
Sample size: The literature reports a 30% incidence of postoperative sore throat with metal blades. The hypothesis is that this incidence could increase from 30% to 40% if plastic blades are used. Un sample size of 356 patients per group is required to detect this increase of 10% with a Chi2 test, a statistic power (1-beta) of 0.80 and alpha type I error probability of 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
metallic blades
laryngoscope blade material
metal reusable blades MacIntosh
laryngoscope blades
plastic laryngoscope blades
Laryngoscope Blade Material
Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®
laryngoscope blades
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
metal reusable blades MacIntosh
laryngoscope blades
Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®
laryngoscope blades
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who has underwent a clinical examination before inclusion
* Patient who has carefully read the information notice and is not opposed to participate to the study
* Patient having a assurance policy or a similar regimen
Exclusion Criteria
* Difficulty to understand the current language (French)
* Presence of predictive factors of difficult orotracheal intubation
* Previous difficult tracheal intubation Grade IV of the MALLANPETI score Limited mouth opening (inter-incisive distance \< 3.5 cm) Limited cervical mobility Thyromental distance \< 6 cm History of radiotherapy or surgery for ENT cancer Retrognathism Presence of gastric tube for postoperative purposes Presence of Pharyngeal and Laryngeal signs before surgery
* Type of surgery Surgery performed without orotracheal intubation Thyroid surgery ENT surgery Withdrawal of gastric banding Bariatric surgery Ambulatory surgery (one-day surgery)
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Serge Ndoko, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Center of Meaux
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
hospital Center of Meaux, department of anesthesiology
Meaux, Meaux, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Amour J, Marmion F, Birenbaum A, Nicolas-Robin A, Coriat P, Riou B, Langeron O. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):60-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00011.
Maktabi MA, Smith RB, Todd MM. Is routine endotracheal intubation as safe as we think or wish? Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):247-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00002. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
K080902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.