Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room
NCT ID: NCT00876967
Last Updated: 2010-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1040 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary outcomes: quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade), duration to success intubation, Intubation difficult Scale and result of intubation procedure
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
metallic single use blade
metallic single use blade
metallic single use blade
2
plastic single use blade
plastic single use blade
plastic single use blade
3
metallic reusable blade
metallic reusable blade
metallic reusable blade
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
metallic single use blade
metallic single use blade
plastic single use blade
plastic single use blade
metallic reusable blade
metallic reusable blade
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* presence of upper airway malformation or abnormality
* cervical or facial trauma
* previous difficult intubation known
* no use of curare
* Body Mass Index over 30kg/m2 if crush induction use
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University Hospital, Caen
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
HANOUZ Jean-Luc, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Anesthesiology critical care SAMU departement, University Hospital of Caen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Caen
Caen, Basse-Normandie, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buleon C, Parienti JJ, Lesage A, Grandin W, Pouliquen E, Flais F, Simonet T, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL. Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr;30(4):163-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835c1cdb.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N°ID RCB 2007-A00321-52
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Laryngotest
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id