Study of an Intervention to Improve Problem List Accuracy and Use
NCT ID: NCT01105923
Last Updated: 2015-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-31
2017-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to the Impact of Accuracy Problem Lists in Electronic Health Records on Correctness and Speed of Clinical Decision-making Performed by Dutch Healthcare Providers
NCT05657002
Natural Language Processing and Quality Assessment in Primary Care
NCT01023243
Improving Quality With Outpatient Decision Support
NCT00225628
Enhancing Patient Ability to Understand and Utilize Complex Information Concerning Medication Self-management
NCT02820038
Health Literacy in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
NCT00508716
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with gaps in their problem list face significant risks. For example, if a hypothetical patient has diabetes properly documented, his clinician would receive appropriate alerts and reminders to guide care. Additionally, the patient might be included in special care management programs and the quality of care provided to him would be measured and tracked. Without diabetes on his problem list, he might receive none of these benefits.
In this study, the investigators developed an clinical decision support intervention that will identify patients with problem lists gaps. The investigators will alert providers of these likely gaps and offer providers the opportunity to correct them.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Receive CDS intervention
Providers in clinics that will receive the CDS alert, as their clinic was randomized into our study.
MAPLE
MAPLE is a CDS intervention within the EHR that will alert providers to problem lists gaps and present an opportunity to correct them.
No CDS intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MAPLE
MAPLE is a CDS intervention within the EHR that will alert providers to problem lists gaps and present an opportunity to correct them.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Practices at participating site
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adam Wright
Senior Scientist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adam Wright, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wright A, Pang J, Feblowitz JC, Maloney FL, Wilcox AR, McLoughlin KS, Ramelson H, Schneider L, Bates DW. Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):555-61. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000521. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009P001846
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.