The Neuroeconomics of Behavioral Therapies for Adolescent Substance Abuse

NCT ID: NCT01093898

Last Updated: 2018-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will measure the brain activity of adolescent substance abusers while they make decisions about their preferences to receive smaller, immediate rewards versus larger delayed rewards. The investigators expect that patterns of brain activity while engaged in this decision making task will predict response to treatment among adolescent substance users. The investigators expect to use the results of this study to develop more effective treatments for adolescent substance abuse

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Little is known about the role of adolescent neurodevelopment in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. The development and evaluation of adolescent substance abuse treatments rarely includes consideration of varying cognitive capacities and their neural representations as determinants of individual variation in treatment response. This proposed R21 project would address this gap by identifying associations among decision making, task-related neural processing, and treatment outcome among adolescents participating/have participated in two randomized clinical trials for adolescent substance abuse. Increasing our understanding of neural processes that underlie decision making in adolescent marijuana and alcohol users would inform the development of future intervention and prevention efforts.

This complementary project draws subjects from two studies investigating contingency-management (CM) based treatments "Behavioral Treatment of Adolescent Marijuana Abuse" (DA015186), and "Family Based Contingency Management for Adolescent Alcohol Abuse" (AA016917). Both trials compare a unique CM intervention that involves an abstinence-based reinforcement program to a standard, state of the art cognitive behavioral intervention. Analyses would be performed separately for the two samples, with hypotheses tested first using the Marijuana sample, and assessed for replication/specificity using the Alcohol sample. The proposed project would explore novel neurobiological predictors of response to CM interventions.

Adolescents recruited into the Marijuana Trial (n=69; 23 per treatment arm) and the Alcohol Trial (n=54; 27 per treatment arm) during the period of this R21 project would participate in a single neuroimaging session as soon after the intake session as possible, within 7 to 30 days. During the neuroimaging session, adolescents would make intertemporal choice decisions in a Delay Discounting task regarding gains of $100 and $1,000. Preliminary data from the Marijuana trial demonstrates significant association between performance on this behavioral delay discounting task and abstinence achieved during treatment over and above the significant effect of treatment condition. The investigators seek to understand the neural processes that underlie performance on this laboratory task, and the degree to which variation in these neural processes relates to and predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. The conceptual framework for the proposed project is based on the neuroeconomics of addiction in general, and the competing neural systems hypothesis in particular (Bechara, 2005a; Bickel, et al., 2007; Daw, et al., 2005; Jentsch \& Taylor, 1999). This behavioral choice hypothesis postulates a biased competition between an "impulsive" (or ''reflexive") neural system (including the striatum, amygdala, ventral pallidum, and related structures) and the "executive" (or "reflective") neural system (including the prefrontal cortex) in understanding patterns of suboptimal decision making among substance-dependent individuals. An overarching hypothesis is that differing responses to distinct treatment approaches (CM vs. CBT) are partially determined by the pattern of activation or functional connectivity within and across these competing neural systems. These project hypotheses would be tested by the following specific aims:

Primary Aims:

* Determine the degree to which performance on a laboratory delay discounting task correlates with activity in impulsive and/or executive neural systems.
* Determine the degree to which performance on a laboratory delay discounting task and neural processing predict adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome over and above the effects of treatment condition.

Secondary Aim:

* Explore interactions between response to CM and delay discounting-related neural processing.

In summary, this proposed exploratory/developmental project would importantly contribute to the understanding of the role of neural processing in adolescent substance-abuse treatment processes and outcome. Specifically, this study has the potential to reveal relations among decision making, neural processing, and treatment outcomes, including the role of patterns of neural activation on response to contingency management among adolescent substance abusers. Results will have implications for future research on adolescent neurodevelopment and adolescent substance abuse treatment. The potential to use neuroscience findings to better understand and improve treatment outcomes in substance-abusing adolescents will have strong public health impact.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adolescent Substance Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

FAMILY_BASED

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No intervention

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants must be 12 to 18 years old and have a parent/guardian who can participate.

1. Report using marijuana during the previous 30 days or provide a marijuana-positive urine test, plus meet criteria for Cannabis Abuse or Dependence OR
2. Meet Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) criteria for Alcohol Abuse or dependence or have had one binge episode, specified by ≥5 drinks in one day, in the past 90 days and report alcohol use in the past 30 days.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to MRI including ferromagnetic implants or claustrophobia
* Meeting DSM criteria for dependence on illicit drugs other than marijuana or alcohol (use/abuse of other drugs will not be excluded)
* Exhibit active psychosis, have severe medical or psychiatric illness limiting participation
* Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Catherine Stanger

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catherine Stanger, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dartmouth College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stanger C, Elton A, Ryan SR, James GA, Budney AJ, Kilts CD. Neuroeconomics and adolescent substance abuse: individual differences in neural networks and delay discounting. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;52(7):747-755.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23800488 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21DA029442-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

36824

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.