Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

NCT ID: NCT01080599

Last Updated: 2010-03-04

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 100 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2009-06-30
• Study Completion Date: 2010-02-28

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.

Conditions

Nerve Block

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL

Study Groups

conventional pubic approach

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

obturator nerve block

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

inguinal approach

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

obturator nerve block

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Interventions

obturator nerve block

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
• Allergy to local anesthetics
• Preexisting neurologic deficits
• Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 20 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Yonsei University, College of Medicine

Other Identifiers

4-2009-0137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id