Paravertebral Blocks: Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT ID: NCT00587704
Last Updated: 2010-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2009-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. To compare the nerve stimulation vs. anatomic techniques of paravertebral block of T11-L1 in providing surgical anesthesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
Secondary aims:
1. Compare VAS pain scores in the two groups of patients over the first 24 hours.
2. Compare opioid intake over the first 24 hours in the two groups of patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ventral or Inguinal Hernia, Robotically Repaired With OviTex Mesh
NCT04779918
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT00509054
Part vs Whole Task Mastery Training for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT01629485
Predictive Factors for the Effectiveness of the Ilioinguinal Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for Hernia Surgery
NCT06121726
Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias
NCT03200405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nerve Stimulation
Use of nerve stimulator for placement of PVB nerve block
PVB using nerve stimulation
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
Anatomic landmarks
Use of anatomic landmarks for placement of PVB block
PVB using anatomic landmarks
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PVB using nerve stimulation
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
PVB using anatomic landmarks
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient must be \>18 years of age
* ASA physical status of I, II, or III
* Patient competent to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
* Contraindications to regional anesthesia
* Allergy to amide local anesthetics
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven R. Clendenen, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07-002759
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.