Observational Crossover Study Comparing Oxygenation and Ventilation Using SiPAP Versus CPAP in LBW Infants

NCT ID: NCT01053455

Last Updated: 2012-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigation of effects of SiPAP versus NCPAP on oxygenation and ventilation in LBW infants with respiratory distress. Our hypothesis is that the LBW infants will achieve the same level of oxygenation and improved ventilation when being treated with SiPAP as compared to NCPAP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilation Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Starting on NCPAP

randomized to start on NCPAP

SiPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

biphasic CPAP (SiPAP) to be alternated in 1 hour blocks with NCPAP

Starting on SiPAP

randomized to SiPAP

SiPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

biphasic CPAP (SiPAP) to be alternated in 1 hour blocks with NCPAP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SiPAP

biphasic CPAP (SiPAP) to be alternated in 1 hour blocks with NCPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. LBW infant (birth weight \<2500 grams)
2. Currently on nasal CPAP
3. Use of nasal CPAP for \>24 hours prior to study initiation
4. If history of intubation with mechanical ventilation, patient will be extubated \>24 hours prior to study initiation
5. FiO2 requirement of 25-50%

Exclusion Criteria

1. FiO2 requirement \>0.5
2. Congenital defects/deformities of the head, pulmonary or cardiovascular systems
3. Chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes
4. Active medical treatment for symptomatic PDA
5. Active medical treatment for culture proven sepsis
6. Within 24 hours of invasive surgical procedure
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrea Lampland

Neonatologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Lampland, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Childrens Hospitals and Clinics of MN - St. Paul

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Childrens Hospital and Clinics of MN - St. Paul

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lampland AL, Plumm B, Worwa C, Meyers P, Mammel MC. Bi-level CPAP does not improve gas exchange when compared with conventional CPAP for the treatment of neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Jan;100(1):F31-4. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2013-305665. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25085943 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0911-106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.