Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
NCT ID: NCT03347136
Last Updated: 2017-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-10
2015-12-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Randomized control , single center trial. Eighty neonates admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) were randomly allocated to NIPPV and CPAP. Outcomes of respiratory support were observed and information on risk factors were obtained by going through bed head ticket.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To compare the effectiveness of CPAP and NIPPV in neonates with mild to moderate respiratory distress.
Specific objectives To determine the effectiveness of CPAP and NIPPV in neonates with mild to moderate respiratory distress To describe neonatal factors associated with CPAP and NIPPV support. To compare the length of hospital stay in neonates who received CPAP and NIPPV To compare the time taken to achieve full enteral nutrition in neonates who received CPAP and NIPPV.
Study design:
Randomized controlled trial
Study setting:
Study carried out in NICU of the Sri Jayawardanapura General Hospital There are 06 ventilators in NICU of Sri Jayawardanapura Hospital. (Three SLE 2000 infant ventilators and three Bear CUB 750 psv infant ventilators.) Respiratory support (conventional ventilation, CPAP and NIPPV) gave through these ventilators. The neonatal soft tip curved nasal canula with tubing will be use for non invasive respiratory support. The nasal canula connected to the ventilator via an endotracheal tube connector. Systems were regularly monitored. Canula size was chosen to comfortably fit the infant's nostrils.
CPAP started with Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 05 and increased up to PEEP 09 according to the severity of baby's condition.
NIPPV started with intermittent Mandatory ventilation (IMV) rate 30, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) 20 and PEEP 5.Increased the settings according to the severity of baby's condition.
Sampling Method. All neonates fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria registered in the study. And a serial number issued. They were allocated to the two arms of study randomly based on a previously generated random allocation schedule.
They were managed according to hospital management protocol and outcome data were collected from the bed head ticket.
The ethical approval taken from the Ethical Review Committee of Sri Jayawardenepura General Hospital kotte.
Approval taken from Medical Technology and supplies sub committee on clinical trials Written informed consent obtained from parents or guardians of eligible infants before randomization The data sheets did not contain the name and be anonymous. Data stored under lock and key with restricted access only to the principal investigators. The computerized data were password protected and is only available to the investigators.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Newborns with CPAP support
Newborn with mild to moderate respiratory distress randomly allocated to CPAP arm. CPAP started with Positive End Expiatory Pressure(PEEEP) 05 and increased up to PEEP 09 according to the severity of baby's condition.
CPAP
Newborns with NIPPV support
Newborn with mild to moderate respiratory distress randomly allocated to NIPPV arm. NIPPV started with Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation rate 30, Peak Inspiratory Pressure 20 and PEEP 5.Increased the settings according to the severity of baby's condition
NIPPV
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPAP
NIPPV
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Respiratory distress needing 3L of O2 to maintain saturation of \>90%
2. Silverman Anderson score of 4 - 6
3. Apnoea
1. \>2 apnoeic attacks needing tactile stimulation for recovery.
2. One apnoea needs resuscitation
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of cardiovascular instability {sepsis, anemia or severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)}.
3. Intubation needed on admission to the NICU
4. Consent not provided or refused
5. Major cardiac disease (not including patent ductus arteriosus \[PDA\]),
\-
20 Minutes
24 Hours
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Anne kaushalya Shilani Gomez,MBBS,MD
acting consultant neonatologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ANNE KS GOMEZ, MBBS,MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Teaching Hospital Mahamodara
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sri Jayawardanapura teaching hospital
Colombo, Western Province, Sri Lanka
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
DK Guha, editors, Jaypee Brothers. NNF Recommended Basic Perinatal-Neonatal Nomenclature. Neonatology- Principles and Practice. 1st ed. New Delhi, 1998: 131-2
J Crowther ANNP Updated by Dr Smith. East Cheshire NHS trust Endotracheal Intubation guide line February 2013 Version 2.0 3
Bhandari V. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the newborn: review of literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Perinatol. 2010 Aug;30(8):505-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.165. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
Perinatal society of Sri Lanka in collaborating with WHO collaborating centre for training and research in new born care, All India Institute of Medical Science.Work book on neonatal ventilation.Learner's guide April 2008.
Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):13-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13.
Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol. 2004 Aug;24(8):487-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211131.
Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Nov;26(5):349-53. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199811)26:53.0.co;2-7.
Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):638-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.638.
De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(1):70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00472.x.
Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.
Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):300-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0922. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2009 Sep;98(9):1412-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01348.x. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Apr;166(4):372-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1142.
Roberts CT, Davis PG, Owen LS. Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: synchronised NIPPV, non-synchronised NIPPV or bi-level CPAP: what is the evidence in 2013? Neonatology. 2013;104(3):203-9. doi: 10.1159/000353448. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
Claure N, Bancalari E. New modes of mechanical ventilation in the preterm newborn: evidence of benefit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Nov;92(6):F508-12. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.108852. Epub 2007 Sep 5. No abstract available.
Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007 May;150(5):521-6, 526.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.032.
Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2.
Bisceglia M, Belcastro A, Poerio V, Raimondi F, Mesuraca L, Crugliano C, Corapi UP. A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Apr;59(2):91-5.
Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, Bhatia J, Soll RF. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Armanian AM, Badiee Z, Heidari G, Feizi A, Salehimehr N. Initial Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;5(12):1543-51.
Wood FE, Gupta S, Tin W, Sinha S. Randomised controlled trial of synchronised intermittent positive airway pressure (SiPAP) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2013;98(Suppl 1):A1-117.
Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, Mancuso D, Reali R. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Mar;95(2):F85-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.169219. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol. 1999 Sep;19(6 Pt 1):413-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200205.
Jasani B, Nanavati R, Kabra N, Rajdeo S, Bhandari V. Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(10):1546-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1059809. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mechanical ventilation in neonates.Version 19.3
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MOHSriLanka
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id