Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial SCANDIV-II
NCT04254224
Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage or Resection for Generalised Peritonitis for Perforated Diverticulitis
NCT01317485
LapLAND Laparoscopic Lavage for Acute Non-Faeculant Diverticulitis
NCT01019239
LASER Trial. LAparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following divERticulitis - a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02174926
Multicenter Study Comparing Morbidity and Quality of Life Associated in the Treatment by Surgical Resection and the Conservative Treatment, After Favorable Evolution of Purulent Peritonitis That Originates From Diverticulitis Treated by Mini-invasive Surgery
NCT01837342
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laparoscopic lavage
Surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis
Primary resection vs laparoscopic lavage
Primary resection
Surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis
Primary resection vs laparoscopic lavage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis
Primary resection vs laparoscopic lavage
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* clinical suspicion of perforated diverticulitis with indication for urgent surgery
* CT scan with free air and findings suggesting diverticulitis
* patient tolerates general anaesthesia
* patients written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* bowel obstruction
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset Asker og Baerum
OTHER
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
OTHER
Sykehuset Ostfold
OTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
OTHER
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
OTHER
Karolinska University Hospital
OTHER
University Hospital, Linkoeping
OTHER
Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF
OTHER
Skane University Hospital
OTHER
Helse Nordmøre og Romsdal
UNKNOWN
Ullevaal University Hospital
OTHER
Helse Stavanger HF
OTHER_GOV
Helse Nord
INDUSTRY
Uppsala University Hospital
OTHER
Centrallasarettet Västerås
OTHER
Sykehuset Buskerud HF
OTHER
Helsingborgs Hospital
OTHER
Vrinnevisjukhuset i Norrköping
UNKNOWN
Eskilstuna Lasarettet
OTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tom Oresland
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tom Oresland, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Akershus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akershus University Hospital
Lorenskog, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Azhar N, Johanssen A, Sundstrom T, Folkesson J, Wallon C, Korner H, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Oresland T, Yaqub S, Buchwald P, Schultz JK; SCANDIV Study Group. Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):121-127. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5618.
Schultz JK, Wallon C, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Folkesson J, Buchwald P, Korner H, Dahl FA, Oresland T, Yaqub S; SCANDIV Study Group. One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1382-1392. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10567. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Schultz JK, Yaqub S, Wallon C, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Folkesson J, Buchwald P, Korner H, Dahl FA, Oresland T; SCANDIV Study Group. Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1364-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12076.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009/177 (REK)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.