Comparing Hartmann's Procedure and Primary Resection with Anastomosis in Hinchey III-IV Diverticulitis: Focus on Ostomy Closure and Long-Term Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT06794905

Last Updated: 2025-01-28

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 578 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2017-01-01
• Study Completion Date: 2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Brief Summary

This multicenter study compares the effectiveness of primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy to Hartmann's procedure for managing perforated sigmoid diverticulitis in stable patients. The findings demonstrate that primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy offers superior long-term outcomes, including higher stoma reversal rates (92% versus 58%), shorter time to closure, and fewer parastomal hernias, contributing to improved quality of life. Kaplan-Meier analysis further supports the benefits of primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, showing significantly better stoma-free survival rates at 24 months. Despite higher short-term readmission rates due to ileostomy-related complications, patients undergoing primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy experienced shorter hospital stays and fewer long-term complications compared to patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure. While Hartmann's procedure remains crucial for unstable cases, the functional and psychological advantages of primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy underscore its value for stable patients. Future research should focus on randomized trials and minimally invasive approaches to refine surgical strategies.

Detailed Description

Detailed Description

This multicenter study evaluates and compares the outcomes of primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy and Hartmann's procedure in the surgical management of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis in stable patients. Conducted across multiple surgical centers, the study provides a comprehensive overview of these approaches in real-world clinical settings. The findings indicate that primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy demonstrates significant advantages over Hartmann's procedure, particularly in terms of long-term outcomes, stoma management, and recovery metrics.

Patients who underwent primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy achieved notably higher stoma reversal rates (92% versus 58%), a shorter median time to stoma closure, and fewer stoma-related complications such as parastomal hernias. These results underscore the benefits of restoring bowel continuity, which plays a critical role in improving both physical functionality and psychological well-being. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed superior stoma-free survival rates at 24 months for patients receiving primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy compared to those treated with Hartmann's procedure.

While Hartmann's procedure remains a valuable option for unstable or critically ill patients due to its simplicity, its long-term disadvantages include a higher prevalence of stoma-related complications, such as parastomal hernias and challenges with colostomy management. Conversely, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a slightly higher rate of early readmissions, often due to issues related to the protective ileostomy, including dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. However, these complications were generally manageable with appropriate follow-up care.

The study also highlights shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times for patients treated with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, contributing to reduced healthcare costs and improved quality of life. These findings suggest that primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy should be considered a first-line option for stable patients, with Hartmann's procedure reserved for those in critical conditions. Future research is recommended to further investigate minimally invasive techniques, long-term quality of life outcomes, and randomized controlled trials to solidify these findings and refine surgical practices.

Conditions

Diverticular Disease of Colon; Colostomy Complication; Colostomy - Stoma

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

rimary Anastomosis with Diverting Loop Ileostomy Group

This group includes patients who underwent segmental resection of the sigmoid colon followed by primary end-to-end anastomosis, protected by a diverting loop ileostomy. The surgical approach aimed to restore bowel continuity while minimizing the risk of anastomotic leakage through the protective ileostomy. Patients in this group were typically stable at the time of surgery, with no life-threatening sepsis or severe hemodynamic instability. Key metrics evaluated included stoma reversal rates, time to stoma closure, postoperative complications (both surgical and systemic), length of hospital stay, and quality of life after recovery. The technical approach incorporated the double-stapling method for anastomosis, and structured follow-up was implemented to monitor for dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and long-term outcomes such as hernias and recurrence.

No interventions assigned to this group

Hartmann's Procedure Group

This group comprises patients who underwent segmental resection of the sigmoid colon with the creation of an end colostomy, leaving the distal rectal stump closed. Hartmann's procedure was performed primarily in patients with more severe clinical conditions, including those with significant sepsis or hemodynamic instability, where the risk of anastomotic complications was deemed unacceptably high. Outcomes assessed in this group included the rates of permanent colostomy, incidence of parastomal hernias, long-term complications related to the colostomy, and overall recovery metrics. Patients were evaluated for potential stoma reversal, although a significant proportion of individuals in this group retained a permanent stoma due to either clinical contraindications or patient preference. Structured follow-up focused on addressing colostomy-related challenges and minimizing complications.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Adults aged 18 years or older.
• Diagnosed with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis classified as Hinchey Stage III or IV.
• Clinically stable patients suitable for emergency colonic resection.
• Eligible to undergo either primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann's procedure.
• Provided informed consent or had a legal surrogate able to consent on their behalf.

Exclusion Criteria

• Hinchey Stage I or II diverticulitis, typically managed conservatively or with less invasive interventions.
• Postoperative confirmation of malignancy as the primary cause of the perforation.
• Undergoing laparoscopic surgery rather than open resection.
• Clinically unstable patients with severe sepsis, septic shock, or significant hemodynamic compromise.
• Pre-existing stomas or prior colonic resections.
• Significant comorbidities, such as advanced cardiac or respiratory failure.
• Limited life expectancy due to terminal illnesses (e.g., advanced malignancies).
• Inability to participate in follow-up assessments due to cognitive impairments or logistical barriers.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Francesco Pizza

Principal Investigator, PhD, Md

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Rehmani S, Bhora F, Flores R. Robotic Lung Cancer Surgery: A Missed Opportunity and a Faulty Conclusion. Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):e34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001996. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27643927 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

20252818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id