Follow Up Study for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease With Deep Brain Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT01022073

Last Updated: 2016-06-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

156 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Follow up of patients enrolled in CSP 468, a study of deep brain stimulation treatment for Parkinson's disease

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease (after Alzheimer's disease), affects more than a million Americans and is a common condition in the Veteran population. Although there is currently no cure for the disease, many of the symptoms of the disease can be effectively managed with medications and with deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study seeks to build upon the original CSP#468 protocol by providing an efficient long-term follow-up study. The objectives of this study are to:

determine whether the motor benefits of deep brain stimulation persist beyond two years of follow-up in patients with Parkinson's disease; determine whether the target of stimulation (GPi vs. STN) affects the durability of long-term motor improvement; define the impact of DBS on long-term function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease; identify clinical features that predict favorable or unfavorable long-term outcome; and describe the long-term performance of the DBS devices, including device durability, device explanation rate, neurostimulator replacement frequency, and changes in stimulation parameters to achieve optimum symptom control.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Globus Pallidus interna Group

Cohort of subjects who received DBS-GPi as part of the CSP 468 intervention trial, and still have their device working and in place.

No interventions assigned to this group

Subthalamic Nucleus Group

Cohort of subjects who received DBS-STN as part of the CSP 468 intervention trial, and still have their device working and in place.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant in CSP#468
* Available and willing to be followed-up according to study protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* DBS device explanted or permanently turned off without anticipated resumption of DBS therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William J. Marks, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA-University of California at Los Angeles(904)

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco-University of California at San Francisco(905)

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

West Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Portland

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland-Oregon Health & science University(906)

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia-University of Pennsylvania Health System(901)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston-Methodist Hospital(903)

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond-Medical college of Virginia(902)

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

468F

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.