Evaluation of a Diabetes-specific Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Subthreshold Depression

NCT ID: NCT01009138

Last Updated: 2022-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

214 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This work is supported by the "Kompetenznetz Diabetes mellitus (Competence Network for Diabetes mellitus)" funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01GI0809).

Approximately one third of diabetic patients has elevated depressive symptoms. The majority of these patients are suffering from a subthreshold depression. In spite of the fact that subthreshold depression has an equivalent negative impact on the prognosis of diabetes as clinical depression, there is no specific intervention tool. The main objective of this project is to develop a diabetes specific cognitive behavioural treatment (DS-CBT) for diabetic patients with subthreshold depression. In a randomized trail DS-CBT is compared to standard diabetes education. A total of 188 diabetic patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to the two treatment conditions. The expected main outcome is the reduction of subthreshold depression under DS-CBT in a 12 month follow up. Secondary variables are improvement of glycaemic control, quality of life, diabetes self-management as well as reduction of health care costs and modification of inflammatory parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Elevated rates for depression in diabetic patients are of clinical significance for diabetology. Depressive disorders are doubled compared to patients without diabetes. A meta-analysis showed that a proportion of 20% of diabetic patients showed subthreshold depression, defined as elevated depressive symptoms without meeting criteria for clinical depression. Depression in diabetes is associated with a reduced quality of life, more diabetes related distress, and higher health related costs. But besides this, depression in diabetes seems to be an independent negative prognostic factor for morbidity and mortality. Furthermore subthreshold depression is a major barrier of an effective self-management of the disease.

Until now antidepressive therapies are only evaluated in clinically depressed diabetic patients. For the majority of depressed diabetic patients suffering from subthreshold depression no evaluated specific intervention concept exists. Since subthreshold depression often is associated with diabetes related distress a diabetes specific intervention was developed to support patients to increase their problem solving skills, modify their depressive cognitions and improve their coping with diabetes related distress. It consists of five sessions and is delivered as a group intervention.

This study is an efficacy trial. In this randomized trial the efficacy of this newly developed intervention is compared to a control condition consisting of five standard diabetes education lessons. The primary outcome variable is the reduction of depressive symptoms twelve months after the intervention. Secondary outcome variables are the quality of life, metabolic parameters, self-care behavior and other psychosocial aspects. Furthermore the possible covariation between change of depressive symptoms and inflammatory and immune markers will be analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depressive Symptoms Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diabetes-Specific CBT (DS-CBT)

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (Group) focusing on Diabetes-Specific Problems

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetes-Specific CBT (DS-CBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

5 Group Sessions with a duration of 90 Minutes each, including the following cognitive-behavioral Intervention Methods focusing on Diabetes Distress and Hassles:

* Problem Analysis and Definition
* Problem Solving Intervention
* Cognitive Restructuring
* Activation of personal and social Resources
* Goal Definition and Agreement

Standard Diabetes Education

Standard Diabetes Education Lessons will be given to quantify the unspecific antidepressive Effects of Participation in Group Sessions with social Contact and Acquisition of Knowledge.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Diabetes Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Diabetes Education Lesson including

* Health Care and specific Topics (e. g. Blood Pressure)
* Social Aspects of Living with Diabetes
* Diabetes Complications
* Sports, Activities and Exercise
* Healthy and unhealthy Food, Vitamins, Cooking Recommendations and Recipes
* Foot Care: Exercises, Care and Control, Sensibility, Injuries, diabetic Neuropathy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diabetes-Specific CBT (DS-CBT)

5 Group Sessions with a duration of 90 Minutes each, including the following cognitive-behavioral Intervention Methods focusing on Diabetes Distress and Hassles:

* Problem Analysis and Definition
* Problem Solving Intervention
* Cognitive Restructuring
* Activation of personal and social Resources
* Goal Definition and Agreement

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Diabetes Education

Standard Diabetes Education Lesson including

* Health Care and specific Topics (e. g. Blood Pressure)
* Social Aspects of Living with Diabetes
* Diabetes Complications
* Sports, Activities and Exercise
* Healthy and unhealthy Food, Vitamins, Cooking Recommendations and Recipes
* Foot Care: Exercises, Care and Control, Sensibility, Injuries, diabetic Neuropathy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Diabetes-Specific Cognitive-Behavioral Group Sessions Educative Group Lesson and Discussion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diabetes mellitus
* Elevated depressive symptoms (regarding to CES-D)
* Age \>= 18 and \<=70
* Sufficient German language skills
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Current MDD
* Current schizophrenia/ psychotic disorder, eating disorder, bipolar disorder, addictive disorder, personality disorder
* Current antidepressive medication
* Current psychotherapy
* Severe physical illness (i.e. cancer)
* Being bedridden
* Guardianship
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

German Diabetes Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Giessen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Norbert Hermanns

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernhard Kulzer, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim e. V.

Norbert Hermanns, Prof., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim e. V.

Thomas J Haak, Prof., MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Diabetes Zentrum Mergentheim; Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim e. V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim e. V.

Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tulu S, Telci Caklili O, Alkaya G, Oguz A. Comment on Hermanns et al. The Effect of a Diabetes-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program (DIAMOS) for Patients With Diabetes and Subclinical Depression: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38:551-560. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):e12. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1692. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26696661 (View on PubMed)

Hermanns N, Schmitt A, Reimer A, Ehrmann D, Haak T, Kulzer B. Response to Comment on Hermanns et al. The Effect of a Diabetes-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program (DIAMOS) for Patients With Diabetes and Subclinical Depression: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38:551-560. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):e13-4. doi: 10.2337/dci15-0017. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26696662 (View on PubMed)

Hermanns N, Schmitt A, Gahr A, Herder C, Nowotny B, Roden M, Ohmann C, Kruse J, Haak T, Kulzer B. The effect of a Diabetes-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program (DIAMOS) for patients with diabetes and subclinical depression: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):551-60. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1416. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25605812 (View on PubMed)

Reimer A, Schmitt A, Ehrmann D, Kulzer B, Hermanns N. Reduction of diabetes-related distress predicts improved depressive symptoms: A secondary analysis of the DIAMOS study. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0181218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181218. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28700718 (View on PubMed)

Schmitt A, Reimer A, Ehrmann D, Kulzer B, Haak T, Hermanns N. Reduction of depressive symptoms predicts improved glycaemic control: Secondary results from the DIAMOS study. J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Nov;31(11):1608-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28865713 (View on PubMed)

Chernyak N, Kulzer B, Hermanns N, Schmitt A, Gahr A, Haak T, Kruse J, Ohmann C, Scheer M, Giani G, Icks A. Within-trial economic evaluation of diabetes-specific cognitive behaviour therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and subthreshold depression. BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 19;10:625. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-625.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20959009 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FKZ 01GI0809

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Depression in Youth Onset Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06285487 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Emotional Wellbeing in Diabetes
NCT05140551 COMPLETED NA