Pilot Study of Closed-Loop Glucose Control in People With Type 1 Diabetes (BPK004)

NCT ID: NCT00977808

Last Updated: 2014-09-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study plans to link two existing technologies, the insulin pump and the continuous glucose monitor (CGM), to essentially develop an artificial pancreas, i.e., closed-loop. This will be done using two continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), a computer containing an investigational control algorithm that uses glucose information from the CGM to recommend insulin dosing, and an insulin pump. The purpose of this study is to test the ability of continuous glucose monitors together with an insulin pump and a mathematical formula to control blood sugar levels of people with type 1 diabetes.

The Closed-Loop control algorithm will:

1. Suggest adequate insulin delivery for blood glucose control in steady state (overnight);
2. Cover adequately with an insulin bolus the pre-set carbohydrate content of a breakfast.

If successful, this study will conceptually prove the feasibility of automated model-predictive closed-loop glucose control in T1DM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each patient had an outpatient screening evaluation, and two 22 h overnight hospital admissions separated by a 2- to 4-week waiting period. Each inpatient admission began at 15:00 and ended at 13:00 on the following day. Subjects ate dinners and lunches with carbohydrate content that was the same at admission 1 and admission 2 and had identical morning meals of Ensure Plus (Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH). Two days before each admission, two Freestyle Navigator CGM devices (Abbott Diabetes Care) continuous glucose monitors were applied to the patient to allow for stabilization of the sensors and for assessment of their performance.

During admission 1, open-loop control was used, with the subjects' usual insulin routine and their personal insulin pump. During admission 2, an OmniPod Insulin Management System (Insulet Corp.) was inserted and used for closed-loop control of blood glucose. Insulin lispro (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN), chosen based on commercial assays available, was used during both inpatient admissions.

At the beginning of admission 2, one of the two CGM devices was designated as primary, and the closed-loop control algorithm used the data of that system, unless a problem was detected. At 17:00, the model-predictive control (MPC) was initiated in a data-collection mode, automatically receiving CGM data every minute. Administration of the predinner insulin bolus was overseen by the attending physician. MPC, closed-loop control began at 21:30 and continued until 12:00 the next day for a total of 14.5 h.

Per FDA restrictions, the algorithm did not automatically control the insulin pump. Instead, the algorithm suggested insulin boluses every 15 min, which, if accepted, were programmed into the insulin pump by the attending physician. This was done for safety reasons, allowing the physician to override insulin delivery suggestions at any time. Reference blood glucose (using a YSI Life Sciences or a Beckman glucose analyzer) was sampled every 30 min. The protocol required switching to more frequent 15 min reference blood glucose sampling if hypoglycemia occurred or was imminent. Fast-acting carbohydrate (glucose tablets or fruit juice) was given when reference blood glucose fell below 3.9 mmol/liter, regardless of the CGM readings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Closed-Loop Model Predictive Control (MPC)

Insulin dosing was performed by a model-predictive control (MPC) algorithm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Closed-Loop, Model Predictive Control (MPC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects used the OmniPod Insulin Management System (Insulet Corp.) and Insulin lispro (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). MPC algorithm suggested insulin boluses every 15 min, which, if accepted, were programmed into the insulin pump by the attending physician. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the open-loop admission (i.e. meals, sleep, etc...).

Open-Loop

Insulin dosing was performed by the patient (using their normal routine and personal insulin pump) under a physician's supervision.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Open-Loop

Intervention Type DEVICE

This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Subjects used their own insulin pumps and Insulin lispro (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, sleep, etc...).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Closed-Loop, Model Predictive Control (MPC)

Subjects used the OmniPod Insulin Management System (Insulet Corp.) and Insulin lispro (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). MPC algorithm suggested insulin boluses every 15 min, which, if accepted, were programmed into the insulin pump by the attending physician. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the open-loop admission (i.e. meals, sleep, etc...).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Open-Loop

This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Subjects used their own insulin pumps and Insulin lispro (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, sleep, etc...).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 21 years of age or older
* Have Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus as defined by American Diabetes Association criteria or judgment of physician for at least 2 years (including those who may also be treated with metformin, thiazolidinedione, exenatide, or pramlintide).
* Use of an insulin pump
* If on antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication, have stability on the medication for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study
* Willingness to use lispro (Humalog) insulin for the duration of the inpatient study
* Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<21
* Pregnancy
* Hematocrit \<36% (females); \<38% (males)
* Symptomatic coronary artery disease (e.g. history of myocardial infarction, history of acute coronary syndrome, history of therapeutic coronary intervention, history of coronary bypass or stenting procedure, stable or unstable angina, episode of chest pain of cardiac etiology with documented EKG changes, positive stress test or catheterization with coronary blockages \>50%).
* Congestive heart failure
* History of a cerebrovascular event
* Use of a medication that significantly impacts glucose metabolism (oral steroids)
* Atrial fibrillation
* Uncontrolled hypertension (resting blood pressure \>140/90)
* History of a systemic or deep tissue infection with methicillin-resistant staph aureus or Candida albicans
* Use of a device that may pose electromagnetic compatibility issues and/or radiofrequency interference with the FreeStyle NavigatorTM CGM (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, electronic pacemaker, neurostimulator, intrathecal pump, and cochlear implants)
* Active enrollment in another clinical trial
* Allergy or adverse reaction to lispro insulin
* Known adrenal gland problem, pancreatic tumor, or insulinoma
* Current alcohol abuse, substance abuse, or severe mental illness
* Retinopathy and renal failure
* Uncontrolled anxiety or panic disorder
* Known bleeding diathesis or dyscrasia
* Renal insufficiency (creatinine \>1.5)
* Any comorbid condition affecting glucose metabolism
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Boris Kovatchev, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Boris P Kovatchev, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kovatchev B, Cobelli C, Renard E, Anderson S, Breton M, Patek S, Clarke W, Bruttomesso D, Maran A, Costa S, Avogaro A, Dalla Man C, Facchinetti A, Magni L, De Nicolao G, Place J, Farret A. Multinational study of subcutaneous model-predictive closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: summary of the results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1374-81. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400611.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21129332 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BPK004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

12998

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.