Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-08-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to validate the SACS Scoring tool by establishing a correlation between the score's numerical values and the degree of obstructive cardiovascular disease visualized during cardiac catheterization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Score TO Predict SHOCK - STOP SHOCK
NCT05570864
Study of the Efficiency of Education About Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT00337480
Home-Based Clinical Management of Cardiac Complications in Systemic Sclerosis
NCT06865118
Values-Affirmation + Education Intervention Targeting Medication Adherence in Older Adults With Heart Failure
NCT05575375
Florida Cardiovascular Quality Network
NCT02921464
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Patients presenting with ATYPICAL symptoms of ACS
* Problems with SENSITIVITY and SPECIFICITY with the 12 Lead EKG
* Inconsistent integration of Patients' Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Risk Factor Profile into the clinical decision making process.
One solution to improving ACS diagnostic accuracy is for clinicians to utilize an ACS Risk Stratification Tool that is proven to be highly sensitive and specific with respect to identifying patients with significant underlying CAD.
While screening approximately 50 patient case studies for inclusion in a 12 Lead EKG education curriculum, multiple incidents were noted where the patient's Modified TIMI ACS Risk Score did not accurately correlate with the patient's degree of cardiovascular disease. In several cases, the disparity between the Modified TIMI Risk Score and the patient's disease status was so great that if clinicians had considered this score in the clinical decision making process, patients would have been discharged with "clean bills of health," while actually having severe underlying CAD; scenarios that would have "set the stage" for adverse outcomes.
In the search for a more reliable ACS Risk Stratification Tool, none were found that were deemed consistently reliable enough for use as an adjunct to clinical decision making. This could be due, in part, to the fact that the tools currently available (TIMI, GRACE, PURSUIT), were primarily designed as prognostic indicators of mortality in patients diagnosed with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in pharmaceutical studies - not as tools to assess the probability that ACS exists in patients presenting to the Emergency Department. This prompted the development of the SACS Score.
In approximately 50 cases informally studied to date, the SACS scoring tool produced scores that are more consistent and more predictive of the presence of obstructive CAD than the Modified TIMI Risk Score.
Our formal study will consist of at least 200 patients, which will include two groups.
GROUP 1 will consist of all Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients (STEMI / NSTEMI) treated at St. Joseph's Hospital, beginning in January, 2009 and continuing until our target number of 200 patients is obtained. In order to not delay urgent cardiac catheterization and treatment, these patients will be studied retrospectively (post cardiac catheterization and intervention).
GROUP 2 will consist of randomly selected patients whom are clinically stable at the time of cardiac catheterization. These patients will be studied prospectively. To maintain integrity of the study, these patients will be selected, with written consent obtained, prior to cardiac catheterization.
Data to be collected in all case studies (both groups) will include demographics and specific information about the patient's SYMPTOMS, EKG FINDINGS, RISK FACTOR PROFILE and CARDIAC LABS.
NOTE: ADDED JULY, 2010: To assure accuracy with respect to comparison of the SACS score to other ACS Risk Stratification scoring tools, we will only include patients in our study whose medical records reflect accurate risk factor history assessments which are consistent with TIMI risk factor assessment guidelines. For example, if it is recorded that the patient has "Family History Positive for Coronary Artery Disease," but it does not state specifically WHICH family member(s), and/or does not state the SPECIFIC CARDIAC DIAGNOSIS (such as "Acute Myocardial Infarction"), and/or does not include the AGE of the family member at the time of diagnosis, we WILL NOT include the patient in our study. A complete list of TIMI Risk Factor Assessment Guidelines TIMI guidelines can be found at www.TIMI.org,
POST CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION data will be classified into categories based on cath lab findings:
1. No visible CAD present
2. Mild-to-moderate plaquing without obstructive CAD. No catheter-based or surgical intervention was performed. Number of lesions, location(s), and percentage(s) of arterial obstruction will be specified.
3. Significant obstructive CAD present. Number of lesions, location(s), and percentage(s) of arterial obstruction and intervention(s) performed will be specified.
4. Acute total occlusion of coronary artery requiring emergency intervention. Location of lesion and intervention(s) performed will be specified.
Regression Analysis of 126 data points collected from each patient will be used to establish relationships between score values and the degree of obstructive CAD present.
We believe that once scientifically validated, the SACS Score will become a useful tool to aid medical professionals in reducing the incidence of patients whom are misdiagnosed with respect to ACS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1. Patients with symptoms of ACS
Patients whom present emergently to the Cardiac Catheterization Lab with current symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), whom at the time of admission to the cardiac catheterization lab are believed to be suffering from STEMI, NSTEMI, or Unstable Angina, with the possible need for emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG).
No interventions assigned to this group
2. Patients without symptoms of ACS
Non-emergency patients presenting to the Cardiac Catheterization Lab for elective coronary angiography, and possible PCI. These are patients whom may have experienced typical or atypical ACS symptoms intermittently, and have elected to have cardiac catheterization to rule out obstructive CAD. Patients in this group will be selected randomly, with consent obtained, prior to cardiac catheterization.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* When unable to obtain all required data sets (SYMPTOMS, EKG, TIMI RISK FACTOR PROFILES, CARDIAC LABS)
* EKG displays DELTA WAVES consistent with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Hospital, Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wayne Ruppert
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wayne W Ruppert, CVT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Joseph's Hospital, Tampa, FL
Humberto Coto, MD, FACC
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
St. Joseph's Hostpial, Tampa, Florida
Xavier E Prida, MD, FACC
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
St. Joseph's Hospital, Tampa, Florida
Charles Sand, MD, FACEP
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
St. Joesph's Hospital, Tampa, FL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph's Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACS SACS Score SJH-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.