Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain in Emergency Departments in the United Arab Emirates

NCT ID: NCT05532787

Last Updated: 2022-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-03

Study Completion Date

2023-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective four-site cohort study, which will accrue adults with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome over a period of 12 months. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, Physicians will complete HEART Pathway and EDACS risk assessments on eligible participants. Major adverse cardiac events as defined by our study will be assessed at 30 days using electronic health record, telephone contact, and national death and health events search. Outcomes for all patients will then be matched against the existing pathway of care for acute chest pain that is being used currently to compare diagnostic accuracy of both scores to diagnose low risk chest pain in this population. The objective of this study is to compare the test performance of the HEART and EDACS pathway in a large cohort of patients presenting to the Emergency department with chest pain in the United Arab Emirates and to determine if either accelerated diagnostic pathway can achieve a negative predictive value of ≥99% for 30-day MACE as well as to externally validate EDACS-ADP and the HEART pathway in the UAE population and gain further insight into the applicability of these decision-making aids in different clinical settings in order to assess which score is best suitable for the UAE population. Our third objective is to compare the effectiveness of both scores to the existing framework for chest pain work up in each hospital and have the opportunity to unify Emergency Departments in their chest pain pathways in the UAE. The investigators will be testing the null hypothesis that there is no difference in using the EDACS-ADP to safely classify patients to low-risk category and early discharge from the ED versus the HEART pathway.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economic feasibility of applying the EDACS and HEART pathways into existing EDs in the emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE as well as to validate the sensitivity and NPV of these pathways given the United Arab Emirate's diverse population.

Over a period of 12 months, ED Physicians at four institutions will collect and retrieve data from their encounters with patients presenting with chest pain. Participants will be recruited from the EDs of four hospitals in the SEHA health network including Zayed Military Hospital, Tawam Hospital, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City and Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi. Our study will include all eligible patients aged 18 years and above presenting acutely from the community to the ED with the chief complaint of chest pain or cardiac symptoms suggestive of ACS as defined by the American Heart Association with at least one troponin ordered, without evidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on ECG will be included. Chest pain will be defined as anterior chest pain, any discomfort located on the anterior thorax between the suprasternal notch and the xiphoid process, using the posterior axillary line as the border between the anterior and posterior thorax. In accordance with American Heart Association case definitions, other suggestive cardiac symptoms include the presence of epigastric, neck, jaw, or arm pain, discomfort or pressure without an apparent noncardiac source will also be included.

Patients that will be excluded are patients younger than 18 years or older than 90 years of age, patients with acute ST-segment elevation on the initial ECG in at least 2 contiguous leads, Hemodynamic instability (pulse rate persistently greater than 100 or less than 50 beats/min or systolic blood pressure persistently below 90 mm Hg), clear traumatic or radiologically evident of non-cardiac etiology, terminal non-cardiac illness, pregnancy or anticipated difficulty in communication or follow up such as any patient with no fixed address or telephone number in the UAE, previous enrollment and incapability or unwillingness for consent.

Data elements for the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP assessments will be entered prospectively by physicians into an Electronic Health Records (EHR)-based clinical decision support tool as well as alternatively a Data Collection Sheet will also be provided. EDACS-ADP and HEART pathways scores will be retrospectively calculated by research investigators not directly involved in patient care and will be logged in the Data collection sheet for each patient. After 30 days, patients will be reviewed for MACE defined as death, cardiac arrest, emergency revascularization procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting, stent placement, or other percutaneous coronary intervention), cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia needing intervention, high-degree atrioventricular block needing intervention, and acute myocardial infarction. All patients will undergo follow up by all three of the following approaches: telephone contact, review of patient hospital notes, and national death and health events search.

Data will be collected for a period of approximately 12 months from September onward, with a target sample size of 800 patients. Patients will be informed of the use of their de-identified data for research purposes and consented for its use. Informed written consent will be obtained from all subjects. All patient data will be anonymous and given a unique research ID. The data will be stored in an encrypted file on a secure computer, and all patient data will be protected. Extracted data from collection sheets will be stored on an encrypted hard drive, accessible only to investigators listed (as in the IRB form) and analyzed using the SPSS software.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Chest Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chest pain

Patients \>18 years of age presenting to ED with chief complaint of chest pain or cardiac symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome with at least one troponin ordered, without evidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on ECG

Application of acute chest pain risk stratification scores (HEART and EDACS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Collection of data elements for the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP assessments and calculation of scores to risk stratify patients into low risk or high risk

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Application of acute chest pain risk stratification scores (HEART and EDACS)

Collection of data elements for the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP assessments and calculation of scores to risk stratify patients into low risk or high risk

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Greater than 18 year old with a chief complaint of chest pain or cardiac symptoms (epigastric, neck, jaw, or arm pain, discomfort or pressure without an apparent noncardiac source).
* Greater than 18 year old chest pain/cardiac symptom patient with atleast one troponin ordered.

Exclusion Criteria

* younger than 18 years
* older than 90 years of age
* acute ST-segment elevation on the initial ECG in at least 2 contiguous leads.
* Hemodynamic instability (pulse rate persistently greater than 100 or less than 50 beats/min or systolic blood pressure persistently below 90 mm Hg)
* clear traumatic or radiologically evident of non-cardiac etiology
* terminal non-cardiac illness
* pregnancy
* anticipated difficulty in communication or follow up
* previous enrollment
* incapability or unwillingness for consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zayed Military Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Farya Rehman

Emergency Medicine Post graduate year 4 Resident Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farya Rehman, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zayed Military Hospital

Rauda Al Nuami, MBBS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Zayed Military Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Sheikh Khalifa Medical City

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status RECRUITING

Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status RECRUITING

Zayed Military Hospital

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status RECRUITING

Tawam Hospital

Al Ain City, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Arab Emirates

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Farya Rehman, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+971547497722

Rauda Al Nuami, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+971505639877

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shaza Karrar, MBBS

Role: primary

+971509808108

Maryam Siddiqi, MBBS

Role: primary

+971501191178

Aya Doudin, MBBS

Role: primary

+971503951593

Rauda Al Nuami, MBBS

Role: primary

+971505639877

Ruqaya Al Afeefi, MBBS

Role: backup

+971544484724

Amani Al Abdouli, MBBS

Role: primary

+971592662287

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Shamsi S, Regmi D, Govender RD. Incidence of cardiovascular disease and its associated risk factors in at-risk men and women in the United Arab Emirates: a 9-year retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1131-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31208354 (View on PubMed)

Eslick GD, Jones MP, Talley NJ. Non-cardiac chest pain: prevalence, risk factors, impact and consulting--a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 May 1;17(9):1115-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01557.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12752348 (View on PubMed)

Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, Singh H, Miller CD, Entrikin DW, Leaming JM, Gavin LJ, Pacella CB, Hollander JE. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201163. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22449295 (View on PubMed)

Than M, Flaws D, Sanders S, Doust J, Glasziou P, Kline J, Aldous S, Troughton R, Reid C, Parsonage WA, Frampton C, Greenslade JH, Deely JM, Hess E, Sadiq AB, Singleton R, Shopland R, Vercoe L, Woolhouse-Williams M, Ardagh M, Bossuyt P, Bannister L, Cullen L. Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol. Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Feb;26(1):34-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12164. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24428678 (View on PubMed)

Chapman AR, Lee KK, McAllister DA, Cullen L, Greenslade JH, Parsonage W, Worster A, Kavsak PA, Blankenberg S, Neumann J, Sorensen NA, Westermann D, Buijs MM, Verdel GJE, Pickering JW, Than MP, Twerenbold R, Badertscher P, Sabti Z, Mueller C, Anand A, Adamson P, Strachan FE, Ferry A, Sandeman D, Gray A, Body R, Keevil B, Carlton E, Greaves K, Korley FK, Metkus TS, Sandoval Y, Apple FS, Newby DE, Shah ASV, Mills NL. Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. JAMA. 2017 Nov 21;318(19):1913-1924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17488.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29127948 (View on PubMed)

Chapman AR, Anand A, Boeddinghaus J, Ferry AV, Sandeman D, Adamson PD, Andrews J, Tan S, Cheng SF, D'Souza M, Orme K, Strachan FE, Nestelberger T, Twerenbold R, Badertscher P, Reichlin T, Gray A, Shah ASV, Mueller C, Newby DE, Mills NL. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1586-1596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28034899 (View on PubMed)

Shin YS, Ahn S, Kim YJ, Ryoo SM, Sohn CH, Kim WY. External validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score accelerated diagnostic pathway (EDACS-ADP). Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;38(11):2264-2270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31757670 (View on PubMed)

Hess EP, Brison RJ, Perry JJ, Calder LA, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Agarwal D, Sadosty AT, Silvilotti ML, Jaffe AS, Montori VM, Wells GA, Stiell IG. Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;59(2):115-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21885156 (View on PubMed)

Than MP, Pickering JW, Aldous SJ, Cullen L, Frampton CM, Peacock WF, Jaffe AS, Goodacre SW, Richards AM, Ardagh MW, Deely JM, Florkowski CM, George P, Hamilton GJ, Jardine DL, Troughton RW, van Wyk P, Young JM, Bannister L, Lord SJ. Effectiveness of EDACS Versus ADAPT Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Practice. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):93-102.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.01.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26947800 (View on PubMed)

Stopyra J, Snavely AC, Hiestand B, Wells BJ, Lenoir KM, Herrington D, Hendley N, Ashburn NP, Miller CD, Mahler SA. Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification. Heart. 2020 Jul;106(13):977-984. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316426. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32269131 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EDACS vs HEART pathway in UAE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Risk Score Alerts for Chest Pain Care
NCT00674375 COMPLETED PHASE3