Study of the Effectiveness of Report Cards on the Quality of Care for Heart Attack and Heart Failure Patients
NCT ID: NCT00187460
Last Updated: 2009-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-11-30
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Two phases of retrospective chart review of AMI and CHF separations to assess the impact of the public release of hospital specific performance on a set of Canadian quality indicators.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The EFFECT Study is one of the largest and most comprehensive initiatives in the world to measure and improve the quality of cardiac care. A randomized trial of cardiac care report cards, the study's objective is to determine whether developing and publishing report cards based on clinical data collected from patient charts leads to greater use of evidence-based therapy at hospitals that receive them.
The three-phase study focuses on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF) and involves 85 hospital corporations (consisting of 103 acute care hospitals) in Ontario. As part of the study design, the hospitals were randomized into two groups: Group A-Early feedback hospitals (44 hospital corporations/53 hospitals) and Group B-Delayed feedback hospitals (41 hospital corporations/50 hospitals).
Phase I A retrospective chart review of hospitalizations from 1999/00 and 2000/01 was conducted in the participating Ontario hospital corporations. Findings from Phase I were documented in two reports:
* Report 1. Report Cards on Group A-Early Feedback Hospitals, released January 2004;
* Report 2. Report Cards on Group B-Delayed Feedback Hospitals, to be released September 2005.
In addition to demographic and treatment information, study data also focus on two sets of quality indicators-one for AMI care and one for CHF care. Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team (CCORT) investigators, in conjunction with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), formed two expert panels to define Canadian AMI and CHF Quality Indicators. The expert panels' membership included clinical leaders in cardiology, internal medicine, family practice, nursing, pharmacy and epidemiology. The indicators are posted on the CCORT web site (www.ccort.ca) and have been published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology. The study's Technical Advisory Committee reviewed all of the proposed AMI and CHF quality indicators and recommended a final list of indicators for inclusion in the EFFECT report cards.
Phase II Report Cards for Group A-Early Feedback Hospitals and Group B-Delayed Feedback Hospitals based on a second phase of retrospective chart review of 2004/05 hospitalizations. (Release in 2006/07)
Phase III Final Report-Impact Assessment: A comparison of results/improvement from Phase I to Phase II. (Release in 2006/07)
Sources of Funding The EFFECT study is being funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CHIR) Interdisciplinary Health Research Team (IHRT) Program and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, with in kind support from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
Principal Investigators The EFFECT study is being led by Dr. Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD, Senior Scientist, ICES, Canada Research Chair, Health Services Research.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early Feedback Arm
Hospital corporations randomized to receive early feedback in the form of a report card
Publicly released hospital cardiac report cards
Participating hospital corporations were randomized to either early feedback or delayed feedback (21 months later) in the form of publicly released hospital report cards of performance on a set of cardiac process-of-care quality indicators.
Delayed Feedback Arm
Hospitals randomized to receive delayed feedback in the form of a hospital report cared, 21 months after the early feedback arm.
Publicly released hospital cardiac report cards
Participating hospital corporations were randomized to either early feedback or delayed feedback (21 months later) in the form of publicly released hospital report cards of performance on a set of cardiac process-of-care quality indicators.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Publicly released hospital cardiac report cards
Participating hospital corporations were randomized to either early feedback or delayed feedback (21 months later) in the form of publicly released hospital report cards of performance on a set of cardiac process-of-care quality indicators.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Patient:
* AMI Most responsible diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction(ICD-9 code 410)
* CHF Most responsible diagnosis of heart failure(ICD-9 code 428)
Exclusion Criteria
* AMI Not admitted to an acute care hospital
* AMI Age \< 20 or \> 105 years
* AMI Invalid health card number
* AMI Admitted to non-cardiac surgical service
* AMI Transferred from another acute care facility
* AMI coded as an in-hospital complication
* AMI admission within the past year
* CHF Not admitted to an acute care hospital
* CHF Age \< 20 or \> 105 years
* CHF Invalid health card number
* CHF Admitted to surgical service
* CHF Transferred from another acute care facility
* CHF coded as an in-hospital complication
* CHF admission within the past three years
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
OTHER
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jack V Tu, MD PhD FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Studies, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tu JV, Donovan LR, Lee DS, Austin PC, Ko DT, Wang JT, Newman AM. Quality of Cardiac Care in Ontario. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, 2004
Jackevicius CA, Alter D, Cox J, Daly P, Goodman S, Filate W, Newman A, Tu JV; Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team. Acute treatment of myocardial infarction in Canada 1999-2002. Can J Cardiol. 2005 Feb;21(2):145-52.
Lee DS, Austin PC, Rouleau JL, Liu PP, Naimark D, Tu JV. Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure: derivation and validation of a clinical model. JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2581-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2581.
Tu JV, Donovan LR, Lee DS, Wang JT, Austin PC, Alter DA, Ko DT. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2330-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1731. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRT43823
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id