Study of the Safety of HPN (Hyperion)-100 for the Long-Term Treatment of Urea Cycle Disorders (Treat UCD)
NCT ID: NCT00947297
Last Updated: 2024-07-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2011-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
To Evaluate the Safety of Long-term Use of HPN-100 in the Management of Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)
NCT01257737
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Imidafenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder
NCT00512785
A Study of DCR-PH1 in Patients With Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 (PH1)
NCT02795325
A Study of Oral Desmopressin in Previously Untreated Children Aged 5 to 15 Years With Primary Nocturnal Enuresis
NCT00245479
Study of DCR-PHXC-101 in Normal Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Primary Hyperoxaluria
NCT03392896
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Forty subjects with a diagnosis of UCD who completed Study HPN-100-006 were enrolled.
Twenty additional UCD subjects ≥ 6 years of age were enrolled. These subjects included those who did not qualify for HPN-100-006 \[e.g., subjects between the ages of 6-17; subjects with other UCD subtypes or adult subjects who have not taken sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPBA) in the past 6 months, etc.\]. For adult subjects not receiving NaPBA in the past 6 months, subjects must, in the judgment of the investigator, be anticipated to benefit from the addition of a nitrogen-scavenging agent to their current treatment. See the inclusion criteria for examples of clinical evidence of potential benefit.
Monthly assessments included safety laboratory tests, amino acid panel, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, venous ammonia, and blood and urine metabolites. Adverse events (AEs) and concomitant medications were recorded on an ongoing basis.
Study acquired from Horizon in 2024.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HPN-100
Patients who were treated with HPN-100
HPN-100
HPN-100 is a triglyceride that has a similar mechanism of action as NaPBA. It is a liquid with minimal taste and odor. Three teaspoons of HPN-100 (\~17.4 mL) delivers equivalent of PBA that 40 tablets of NaPBA do.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HPN-100
HPN-100 is a triglyceride that has a similar mechanism of action as NaPBA. It is a liquid with minimal taste and odor. Three teaspoons of HPN-100 (\~17.4 mL) delivers equivalent of PBA that 40 tablets of NaPBA do.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
\*Additionally, approximately 20 UCD subjects ≥ 6 years of age may be enrolled who have not participated in HPN-100-006. These subjects may include those who did not qualify HPN-100-006 (e.g., subjects between the ages of 6-17 years, subjects with other UCD subtypes, or adult subjects who have not taken sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPBA) in the past 6 months, etc.). For adult subjects not receiving NaPBA in the past 6 months, subjects must, in the judgment of the investigator, be anticipated to benefit from the addition of a nitrogen-scavenging agent to their current treatment. Clinical evidence of potential benefit from introduction of an ammonia-scavenging agent might include a recent history (in the past year) of clinically overt hyperammonemia accompanied by a venous ammonia ≥ 100 μmol/L, a recent history (within the past year) of protein intolerance, or a history of abnormally high venous ammonia levels accompanied by symptoms (e.g., headache) that might reasonably be attributed to hyperammonemia.
* Signed informed consent by subject and/or subject's legally acceptable representative.
* Diagnosis of urea cycle disorder (enzyme or transporter deficiency) confirmed via enzymatic, biochemical, or genetic testing.
* Able to perform and comply with study activities, including blood draws.
* Negative pregnancy test for all females of childbearing potential.
* All females of childbearing potential and all sexually active males must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception throughout the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of 4 or more hyperammonemic events as defined in Section 3.5.1 in the preceding 12 months.
* Active infection (viral or bacterial) or any other condition that may increase venous ammonia levels.
* Any clinical or laboratory abnormality or medical condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, may put the subject at increased risk by participating in this study.
* Use of any medication known to significantly affect renal clearance (e.g., probenecid) or to increase protein catabolism (e.g., corticosteroids), or other medication known to increase venous ammonia levels (e.g., valproate), within the 24 hours prior to Day 1 and throughout the study.
* History of QTc (QT interval corrected) prolongation, or a QTc interval ≥ 450 msec or an increase of ≥ 60 msec during the previous HPN-100 study if applicable.
* Known hypersensitivity to PAA or PBA.
* Liver transplant, including hepatocellular transplant.
* Breastfeeding or lactating females.
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Amgen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Long Beach Memorial
Long Beach, California, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Univeristy of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
SNBL-Clinical Pharmacology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts-New England Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mokhtarani M, Diaz GA, Rhead W, Berry SA, Lichter-Konecki U, Feigenbaum A, Schulze A, Longo N, Bartley J, Berquist W, Gallagher R, Smith W, McCandless SE, Harding C, Rockey DC, Vierling JM, Mantry P, Ghabril M, Brown RS Jr, Dickinson K, Moors T, Norris C, Coakley D, Milikien DA, Nagamani SC, Lemons C, Lee B, Scharschmidt BF. Elevated phenylacetic acid levels do not correlate with adverse events in patients with urea cycle disorders or hepatic encephalopathy and can be predicted based on the plasma PAA to PAGN ratio. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Dec;110(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
Diaz GA, Krivitzky LS, Mokhtarani M, Rhead W, Bartley J, Feigenbaum A, Longo N, Berquist W, Berry SA, Gallagher R, Lichter-Konecki U, Bartholomew D, Harding CO, Cederbaum S, McCandless SE, Smith W, Vockley G, Bart SA, Korson MS, Kronn D, Zori R, Merritt JL 2nd, C S Nagamani S, Mauney J, Lemons C, Dickinson K, Moors TL, Coakley DF, Scharschmidt BF, Lee B. Ammonia control and neurocognitive outcome among urea cycle disorder patients treated with glycerol phenylbutyrate. Hepatology. 2013 Jun;57(6):2171-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.26058. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HPN-100-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.