Standard of Care Versus Urine Testing With Selective PHarmacogenomics for Effective Drug and Dosing REgimens
NCT ID: NCT02625155
Last Updated: 2018-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
14000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly (URGE)
NCT01786967
Two Phase Extension Trial of SP668 to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Sustained Release Fesoterodine in Subjects With Overactive Bladder: a Double-Blind Phase Followed by an Open-Label Extension Phase
NCT00220389
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tolterodine on Specific Symptoms in Adult Patients With Overactive Bladder.
NCT00645281
This Is A Study Of Bioavailability And Food Effect For Fesoterodine.
NCT01286454
Comparative Urine Proteomic Studies of Overactive Bladder in Humans
NCT01367886
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care (SOC Arm)
Standard of Care UDT
Urine diagnostic testing as SOC, drug regimen changes per SOC
Selective PGx Testing (Test Arm)
Standard of Care UDT with selective PGx testing
Urine diagnostic testing with selective PGx testing, drug regimen changes based on PGx test results
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Urine diagnostic testing as SOC, drug regimen changes per SOC
Urine diagnostic testing with selective PGx testing, drug regimen changes based on PGx test results
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject or legal representative is able and willing to provide informed consent;
3. Subject has had a TDRAE including ineffective therapeutic response within the last 60 days or is a new patient to the treating healthcare provider's practice;
4. Subject is scheduled for or is planned to be scheduled for UDT, ordered as per the treating healthcare provider's local standard of care;
5. Subject is currently receiving or the subject's treating healthcare provider is considering treatment with at least one target drug listed below and metabolized by one or more genes considered in this study: Amitriptyline, Imipramine, Diazepam, Alprazolam, Codeine, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Methadone, Meperidine, Fentanyl and Carisoprodol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. PGx testing is deemed mandatory in the opinion of the treating healthcare provider;
3. History of liver or renal transplantation;
4. Receiving chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis;
5. Currently hospitalized or in a long-term care facility;
6. Participation in another clinical trial that would, in the Investigator's opinion, interfere with the conduct of this study;
7. Subject or subject's guardian or advocate is unable to provide an accurate history of the subject's medical history, medications, and symptoms.
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Syntactx
NETWORK
InSource Diagnostics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Donald H. Deaton, Jr., DO
Tazewell, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Donald H. Deaton, DO
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Phimister EG, Feero WG, Guttmacher AE. Realizing genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):757-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1200749. No abstract available.
Rebsamen MC, Desmeules J, Daali Y, Chiappe A, Diemand A, Rey C, Chabert J, Dayer P, Hochstrasser D, Rossier MF. The AmpliChip CYP450 test: cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype assessment and phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics J. 2009 Feb;9(1):34-41. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2008.7. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
Hicks JK, Bishop JR, Sangkuhl K, Muller DJ, Ji Y, Leckband SG, Leeder JS, Graham RL, Chiulli DL, LLerena A, Skaar TC, Scott SA, Stingl JC, Klein TE, Caudle KE, Gaedigk A; Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Aug;98(2):127-34. doi: 10.1002/cpt.147. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
Crews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, Klein TE, Shen DD, Callaghan JT, Kharasch ED, Skaar TC; Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for codeine therapy in the context of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Feb;91(2):321-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.287. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
Sohn DR, Kusaka M, Ishizaki T, Shin SG, Jang IJ, Shin JG, Chiba K. Incidence of S-mephenytoin hydroxylation deficiency in a Korean population and the interphenotypic differences in diazepam pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Aug;52(2):160-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1992.125.
Bernard S, Neville KA, Nguyen AT, Flockhart DA. Interethnic differences in genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 in the U.S. population: clinical implications. Oncologist. 2006 Feb;11(2):126-35. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-2-126.
Wijnen PA, Op den Buijsch RA, Drent M, Kuijpers PM, Neef C, Bast A, Bekers O, Koek GH. Review article: The prevalence and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;26 Suppl 2:211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03490.x.
Linares OA, Fudin J, Daly AL, Boston RC. Individualized Hydrocodone Therapy Based on Phenotype, Pharmacogenetics, and Pharmacokinetic Dosing. Clin J Pain. 2015 Dec;31(12):1026-35. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000214.
Falzone E, Hoffmann C, Keita H. Postoperative analgesia in elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2013 Feb;30(2):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s40266-012-0047-7.
Balhara YP, Jain R. A urinalysis-based study of buprenorphine and non-prescription opioid use among patients on buprenorphine maintenance. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;3(1):15-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.92496.
Christo PJ, Manchikanti L, Ruan X, Bottros M, Hansen H, Solanki DR, Jordan AE, Colson J. Urine drug testing in chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):123-43.
Uher R, Farmer A, Henigsberg N, Rietschel M, Mors O, Maier W, Kozel D, Hauser J, Souery D, Placentino A, Strohmaier J, Perroud N, Zobel A, Rajewska-Rager A, Dernovsek MZ, Larsen ER, Kalember P, Giovannini C, Barreto M, McGuffin P, Aitchison KJ. Adverse reactions to antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;195(3):202-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061960.
Vilhelmsson A, Svensson T, Meeuwisse A, Carlsten A. What can we learn from consumer reports on psychiatric adverse drug reactions with antidepressant medication? Experiences from reports to a consumer association. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct 25;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-11-16.
Fabbri C, Serretti A. Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0594-9.
Kreyenbuhl JA, Valenstein M, McCarthy JF, Ganoczy D, Blow FC. Long-term antipsychotic polypharmacy in the VA health system: patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):489-95. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.489.
Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, Benser M, Edmondson AC, Bates DW. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00451-4.
Moeller KE, Lee KC, Kissack JC. Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jan;83(1):66-76. doi: 10.4065/83.1.66.
Crews KR, Hicks JK, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and individualized medicine: translating science into practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;92(4):467-75. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.120. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Hamburg MA, Collins FS. The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. Epub 2010 Jun 15. No abstract available.
Yiannakopoulou E. Pharmacogenomics and Opioid Analgesics: Clinical Implications. Int J Genomics. 2015;2015:368979. doi: 10.1155/2015/368979. Epub 2015 May 14.
Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, Agatep BC, Aubert RE, Epstein RS, Frueh FW. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;91(3):450-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.306. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
Deverka PA. Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.1159/000189627. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
Local Coverage Determination (LCD): CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 Genetic Testing (L35472). 2015. (Accessed 8/10/2015, at https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/lcd-details.aspx?LCDId=35472&ContrId=357.)
Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Trescot AM, Giordano J. Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: tools, techniques, and utility. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S155-80.
Konstantinova SV, Normann PT, Arnestad M, Karinen R, Christophersen AS, Morland J. Morphine to codeine concentration ratio in blood and urine as a marker of illicit heroin use in forensic autopsy samples. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Apr 10;217(1-3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
Standridge JB, Adams SM, Zotos AP. Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Mar 1;81(5):635-40.
Disability Evaluation Under Social Security. (Accessed 3/5/2014, 2014, at http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/general-info.htm.)
Inter-agency guideline for opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain.2010.
National Bioeconomy Blueprint. The White House; 2012:48.
World Guide for Drug Use and Pharmacogenomics. Corunna, Spain: EuroEspes Publishing; 2012.
Model policy on the use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. Federation of State Medical Boards; 2013.
ACOEM. Guidelines for the Chronic Use of Opioids. 2 ed: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Michna E, Jamison RN, Pham LD, Ross EL, Janfaza D, Nedeljkovic SS, Narang S, Palombi D, Wasan AD. Urine toxicology screening among chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: frequency and predictability of abnormal findings. Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802b4f95.
Wiedemer NL, Harden PS, Arndt IO, Gallagher RM. The opioid renewal clinic: a primary care, managed approach to opioid therapy in chronic pain patients at risk for substance abuse. Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):573-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00254.x.
Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, Seger AC, Peterson J, Burdick E, Seger DL, Shu K, Federico F, Leape LL, Bates DW. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1556-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020703.
Manchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Pampati V, Cash KA. Prevalence of side effects of prolonged low or moderate dose opioid therapy with concomitant benzodiazepine and/or antidepressant therapy in chronic non-cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):259-67.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.