Self Expanding Nitinol Stent Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Arterial Angioplasty (PTA) With Optional Bailout Stenting in Case of PTA Failure in Patients With Symptomatic Critical Limb Ischemia or Severe Intermittent Claudication (EXPAND)
NCT ID: NCT00906022
Last Updated: 2015-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-05-31
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of this study is to show clinical improvement in the outcome of patients with symptomatic critical limb ischemia or severe intermittent claudication (Rutherford 3, 4, 5) treated with the Astron Pulsar SE (4 or 5 mm diameter) in comparison with PTA or optional bailout stenting in case of PTA failure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of Focal Implant Used for Lower Extremity Post-angioplasty Dissection
NCT05562076
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the FlexStent® Femoropopliteal Self-Expanding Stent System
NCT01355406
Safety and Effectiveness Study of EverFlex Stent to Treat Symptomatic Femoral-popliteal Atherosclerosis
NCT00530712
Edwards Lifesciences Self-Expanding Stent Peripheral Vascular Disease Study
NCT00673985
PTA vs. Primary Stenting of SFA Using Self-Expandable Nitinol Stents
NCT00715416
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Astron Pulsar Stent
Device: Astron Pulsar Stent
Astron Pulsar Stent
Stenting with Astron Pulsar
PTA alone
Device: Balloon angioplasty alone
PTA alone
Balloon angioplasty alone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Astron Pulsar Stent
Stenting with Astron Pulsar
PTA alone
Balloon angioplasty alone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient has signed the patient informed consent.
3. Patient is willing to adhere to the follow up time points and to follow the requirements during the study
4. Patient has symptomatic critical limb ischemia or severe intermittent claudication classified as Rutherford category 3, 4 or 5.
5. Stenotic (\> 50%) or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries below the radiographic level of the knee joint and above the level of the ankle (includes the peroneotibial trunk, anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery, excludes the popliteal artery), as determined by pre-procedure intra-arterial DSA (preferred) or conventional angiography.
6. Target (study) lesion to be treated is a de novo lesion (lesion ≤ 190 mm length). NOTE: Multiple or diffused lesion treatment is allowed as long as total lesion length ≤ 190 mm)
7. Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 and 4.0 mm.
8. Target vessel: It must be possible to follow the vessel run-off to the foot and/or the wound area. NOTE: Patients with incomplete or abnormal anatomical run-off are NOT excluded. Important is to see that the there is a run-off to the foot and/or wound area even if collaterals are involved.
9. Haemodynamically significant inflow stenoses of vessels above the knee were successfully treated before.
10. Lesions must be crossed successfully with a guide wire and guide wire must be within the true lumen of the distal vessel.
Notes:
* Target vessel has to be defined; Target vessel = vessel with target lesion to be treated
* NON-target vessel(s): haemodynamically significant lesion can be treated according to investigator's discretion
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient is legally, physically or mentally unable to give consent.
3. ABI / TBI measurement is impossible.
4. Target lesion is pre-treated.
5. Target lesion lies within or adjacent to an aneurysm.
6. Acute thrombus present in the target limb.
7. The reference vessel diameter is not suitable for available stent size (RVD \< 2.5 and \> 4.0 mm).
8. Length of lesion requires more than one treatment device (lesion length \> 190 mm)
9. Hybrid technique (bypass surgery and peripheral intervention with PTA or stent during the same session) is not allowed. Note: Allowed is if the patient got a P1 or P3 bypass in a previous session and it is possible to treat a distal lesion through that bypass in a separate session. Time window between bypass surgery and planned intervention must be at least 30 days.
10. Life-expectancy less than 12 months at the time of screening.
11. Patient has a known allergy to heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel or other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, to nickel or contrast media or is unwilling to tolerate such therapies.
12. Patient has bleeding diatheses
13. Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial.
14. Patient took part in another investigational device or drug trial within 3 months prior to screening.
15. Patient is currently breast-feeding, pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
16. Myocardial infarction without coronary revascularization \< 6 months prior to screening and with coronary revascularization \< 1 month prior to screening.
17. Previous coronary or peripheral bypass surgery within 30 days prior to screening.
18. Patient had a calculated creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min within 30 days prior to screening.
19. Patient had a stroke or TIA within the last 6 months prior to screening.
20. Patient had a major amputation of the target limb (defined as above the ankle) at the time of screening
51 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biotronik AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gefässzentrum Berlin, Evangelisches Krankenhaus KEH
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schulte KL, Pilger E, Schellong S, Tan KT, Baumann F, Langhoff R, Torsello G, Zeller T, Amendt K, Brodmann M; EXPAND Investigators. Primary Self-EXPANDing Nitinol Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Bailout Stenting for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Intermittent Claudication or Critical Limb Ischemia (EXPAND Study). J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):690-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815598955. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C0801
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.