Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Treatment With APERIUS®

NCT ID: NCT00887744

Last Updated: 2016-01-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of the study is to measure the change in severity of symptoms and ability to function in every day activities in patients suffering from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis after treatment with the Aperius® device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Treatment with Aperius® (INCA) trial was designed as a multicenter single arm post-marketing study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aperius® in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.

One hundred fifty six patients with a history of Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (Lumbar level L1 to L5) at one or maximum 2 levels with symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication with or without back pain were included. All patients were followed for 12 months with visits at 48 hours, 7 days, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months.

Primary effectiveness endpoint was assessed as the mean percentage change from baseline in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire for Symptom Severity at 6 weeks. Other effectiveness outcomes were percentage change in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores (ZCQ), Quality of laife Questionnaire scores (called EuroQuol 5D or EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (back, leg and buttock groin pain), pain medication and changes in walking distance from baseline to follow-up. Procedure and device related Serious Adverse Events were assessed throughout the complete 12 month follow-up period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aperius Treatment Arm

Single Arm

Group Type OTHER

Aperius® Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of the Aperius® device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aperius® Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer

Implantation of the Aperius® device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aperius®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* History of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (Lumbar spine level from L1 -L5), confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at one or maximal two levels, with symptoms of intermittent neurogenic claudication.
* Leg / Buttock / Groin pain, with or without back pain, relieved by flexion. If back pain is also present, it must be partially relieved when flexed.
* Able to sit for 50 minutes without pain.
* Able to walk a distance of 20 meters without pain.
* Patient states availability for and willing to perform all follow -up examinations.
* Patient signed informed consent form.
* Adults (minimum 21 years of age).

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous lumbar surgery.
* Unremitting pain (leg/buttock/groin/back) in any spinal position.
* Axial back pain without leg/buttock/groin pain.
* Significant lumbar instability at the affected level: spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1 on a scale from 1-4.
* Objective motor deficit.
* Significant peripheral neuropathy by nerve conduction velocity tests (peroneal and sural nerves) according to the investigator.
* Cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence).
* Spinal Stenosis with clinical symptoms at one or more levels outside the L1-L5 lumbar region.
* Severe symptomatic Spinal Stenosis requiring immediate surgical decompression,according to the investigator or lumbar spinal stenosis at more than 2 levels.
* Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, caused by tumors, metastasis or Paget's disease.
* Vascular claudication and severe peripheral vascular disease. (Diminished dorsalis pedis or tibial pulses) that limits walking.
* History of primary or secondary osteoporosis defined as a DXA scan (=dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) of the hip showing T-score (=the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the patient's age, sex and ethnicity) of more than 2.5 standard deviation below the mean in the presence of one or more fragility fractures.
* Active systemic infection or local infection at the level to treat.
* Major Depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV criteria.
* Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
* Unable to complete the study.
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

E. Wuelfert, Pharm.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medtronic Spinal & Biologics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Campus Middelheim

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Academic Hospital Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Park Léopold Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Notre Dame de Grace Hospital

Gosselies, , Belgium

Site Status

University Hospital Tivoli

La Louvière, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital du Grand Hornu

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie (Hospital)

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Gemeinschaftspraxis Königsallee (Privat Clinic)

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Asklepios Hospital Lindenlohe

Schwandorf in Bayern, , Germany

Site Status

Orthopädische Fachklinik Schwarzach (Hospital)

Schwarzach, , Germany

Site Status

Woodend Hospital

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Germany United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIP-0001-AP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Restore CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT01609374 UNKNOWN NA
Condition of Approval Study
NCT00517751 TERMINATED PHASE4