Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Treatment With APERIUS®
NCT ID: NCT00887744
Last Updated: 2016-01-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Evaluation Study
NCT00905359
Study on the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis With a Percutaneous Interspinous Implant
NCT01057641
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Decompression With an Interlaminar Implant in Patients With Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Caused by Lumbar Stenosis
NCT01727752
Effects of X-STOP® Versus Laminectomy Study
NCT00558129
Safety Study for An Artificial Disc Nucleus Replacement to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04004156
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One hundred fifty six patients with a history of Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (Lumbar level L1 to L5) at one or maximum 2 levels with symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication with or without back pain were included. All patients were followed for 12 months with visits at 48 hours, 7 days, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months.
Primary effectiveness endpoint was assessed as the mean percentage change from baseline in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire for Symptom Severity at 6 weeks. Other effectiveness outcomes were percentage change in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores (ZCQ), Quality of laife Questionnaire scores (called EuroQuol 5D or EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (back, leg and buttock groin pain), pain medication and changes in walking distance from baseline to follow-up. Procedure and device related Serious Adverse Events were assessed throughout the complete 12 month follow-up period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aperius Treatment Arm
Single Arm
Aperius® Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer
Implantation of the Aperius® device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aperius® Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer
Implantation of the Aperius® device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Leg / Buttock / Groin pain, with or without back pain, relieved by flexion. If back pain is also present, it must be partially relieved when flexed.
* Able to sit for 50 minutes without pain.
* Able to walk a distance of 20 meters without pain.
* Patient states availability for and willing to perform all follow -up examinations.
* Patient signed informed consent form.
* Adults (minimum 21 years of age).
Exclusion Criteria
* Unremitting pain (leg/buttock/groin/back) in any spinal position.
* Axial back pain without leg/buttock/groin pain.
* Significant lumbar instability at the affected level: spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1 on a scale from 1-4.
* Objective motor deficit.
* Significant peripheral neuropathy by nerve conduction velocity tests (peroneal and sural nerves) according to the investigator.
* Cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence).
* Spinal Stenosis with clinical symptoms at one or more levels outside the L1-L5 lumbar region.
* Severe symptomatic Spinal Stenosis requiring immediate surgical decompression,according to the investigator or lumbar spinal stenosis at more than 2 levels.
* Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, caused by tumors, metastasis or Paget's disease.
* Vascular claudication and severe peripheral vascular disease. (Diminished dorsalis pedis or tibial pulses) that limits walking.
* History of primary or secondary osteoporosis defined as a DXA scan (=dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) of the hip showing T-score (=the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the patient's age, sex and ethnicity) of more than 2.5 standard deviation below the mean in the presence of one or more fragility fractures.
* Active systemic infection or local infection at the level to treat.
* Major Depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV criteria.
* Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
* Unable to complete the study.
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
E. Wuelfert, Pharm.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medtronic Spinal & Biologics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Campus Middelheim
Antwerp, , Belgium
Academic Hospital Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV
Bruges, , Belgium
Park Léopold Hospital
Brussels, , Belgium
Notre Dame de Grace Hospital
Gosselies, , Belgium
University Hospital Tivoli
La Louvière, , Belgium
Hospital du Grand Hornu
Mons, , Belgium
Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie (Hospital)
Cologne, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Königsallee (Privat Clinic)
Düsseldorf, , Germany
University Hospital Erlangen
Erlangen, , Germany
Asklepios Hospital Lindenlohe
Schwandorf in Bayern, , Germany
Orthopädische Fachklinik Schwarzach (Hospital)
Schwarzach, , Germany
Woodend Hospital
Aberdeen, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIP-0001-AP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.