Clinical Evaluation of a Closed Loop Oxygen Controller for Neonatal Respiratory Care
NCT ID: NCT00887731
Last Updated: 2013-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-08-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are at least three clinical issues that this technology addresses: the first is avoidance of episodic hyperoxia; the second is decreasing episodic hypoxia; and the third is lowering cumulative oxygen exposure.
Clinical trials which have used target SpO2 ranging probably help improve all of these problems, but so far there have been no direct measurements of continuous arterial oxygen levels, nor clinical studies which establish the degree to which improving control over blood oxygen saturation decreases the cumulative amount of oxygen exposure. This study will address the later and is an important step in the process of incorporating closed-loop oxygen control technology as a routine standard of neonatal respiratory care.
OBJECTIVES:
PART 1: Test and modify the instruction set for the computerized oxygen controller to achieve a goal of less than six (6) operator required interruptions per hour for oxygen saturation deviations outside of study guidelines.
PART 2: Perform a within patient cross-over trial of the computerized oxygen controller versus standard of care (the patient's care team adjusts the patient's oxygen level) and evaluate the area under the time curve for oxygen exposure between the two control methods.
PART 3:(After successful completion of PART 2) Continuation of the within patient cross-over study with a randomized cross-over sequence. Studies will last 4 to 12 hours divided in two (2) equal time blocks with one cross-over to either automatic or manual control modes. Provision for up to an additional twenty (20) patients to be studied.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. The system was able to regulate to within 1% of the set inspired oxygen level and resulted in stable infant arterial oxygen levels measured transcutaneously. Twenty years later, with the advent of pulse oximetry and computer technology, open loop control of infant oxygen saturation was studied in newborns using computer programs incorporating fuzzy logic and clinical algorithms.
2. During computer-assisted inspired oxygen adjustment there was less variability in pulse oximeter oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and patients spent more time within the target oxygen saturation range. The next technology step was to move from open to closed loop control, as was done by Claure et al in 2001.
3. These investigators found that closed loop control of inspired oxygen was at least as effective as a fully dedicated nurse in maintaining SpO2 within the target range, and that it may be more effective than a nurse working under routine conditions. Percent of recording time spent at normoxia increased from 66% to 75%. Other bench research suggests that closed loop oxygen controllers based on SpO2 monitoring can have response times within 20 seconds and be able to maintain SpO2 within three percent saturation.
4. In a clinical crossover trial it was shown that compared to routine inspired oxygen control management by bedside personnel, closed loop control of inspired oxygen concentration significantly increased time within target saturation range from 82% to 91%.
5. The importance of controlling oxygen exposure in neonates has been long standing, especially as it relates to retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The prospect for decreasing oxygen related morbidities is still a real and an ongoing topic for process change directed to overcoming treatment barriers.
6. Maintaining oxygen saturation tightly within appropriate treatment ranges appears to improve both short and long term outcomes, including developmental indices.
7. Given the improvement in oxygen exposure that can be realized by closed-loop control of inspired oxygen concentration as demonstrated above, the development of commercial devices that incorporate this technology is highly desirable and a positive move toward uniform control of oxygen exposure for neonates. There are at least three clinical issues that this technology addresses: the first is avoidance of episodic hyperoxia; the second is decreasing episodic hypoxia; and the third is lowering cumulative oxygen exposure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Part 1 group
Observational study with a convenience sample of ten (10) patients. PART 1 will end when at least 3 of 4 consecutive patients achieve the goal of less than six (6) operator required interruptions per hour for oxygen saturation deviations from study guidelines, or at ten (10) patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Part 2 group
(After successful completion of PART 1) Within patient cross-over study with a randomized cross-over sequence. Sequential data analysis methods will be used to help minimize the patient sample size which will be no more than twenty (20) patients plus up to a maximum of seven (7) who might be eligible from PART 1.
No interventions assigned to this group
Part 3 Group
(After successful completion of PART 2) Within patient cross-over study with a randomized cross-over sequence. Studies will last 4 to 12 hours divided in two (2) equal time blocks with one cross-over to either automatic or manual control modes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parental consent
Exclusion Criteria
3 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Utah
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donald N-u-l-l, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Primary Children's Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30125
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id