Dexmedetomidine Versus Pentobarbital for Pediatric Procedural Sedation
NCT ID: NCT00878345
Last Updated: 2018-06-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Versus a Combination of the Two as a Premedication for Children Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy Tube Insertion
NCT02134327
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Intensive Care Sedation of Children
NCT01091818
Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Subjects Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
NCT01519167
Evaluating the Effects of Propofol vs. Dexmedetomidine
NCT03552146
The Efficacy and the Safety of Dexmedetomidine Sedation on the Pediatric Intensive Unit(PICU) Patients.
NCT02296073
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Dexmedetomidine sedation protocol
dexmedetomidine sedation protocol
Arm 1 will undergo sedation with dexmedetomidine, using 2 mcg/kg load IV over 10 minutes followed by an IV infusion of 1 mcg/kg/hr. May use versed 0.5 mg/kg IV x 1 for incomplete sedation, followed by increase of dexmedetomidine infusion to 1.5 mcg/kg/hr. Infusion will run throughout non-painful procedure (most likely MRI).
2
Pentobarbital sedation protocol
pentobarbital sedation protocol
Pentobarbital Sedation Protocol IV: 2.5 mg/kg, followed by 1.25 mg/kg as needed x2. Maintenance: May give additional 1.25 mg/kg IV x 2 if needed. Max total dose of 200 mg pentobarbital throughout sedation.
May give midazolam 0.05 mg/kg IV x 1 PRN agitation for rescue sedation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dexmedetomidine sedation protocol
Arm 1 will undergo sedation with dexmedetomidine, using 2 mcg/kg load IV over 10 minutes followed by an IV infusion of 1 mcg/kg/hr. May use versed 0.5 mg/kg IV x 1 for incomplete sedation, followed by increase of dexmedetomidine infusion to 1.5 mcg/kg/hr. Infusion will run throughout non-painful procedure (most likely MRI).
pentobarbital sedation protocol
Pentobarbital Sedation Protocol IV: 2.5 mg/kg, followed by 1.25 mg/kg as needed x2. Maintenance: May give additional 1.25 mg/kg IV x 2 if needed. Max total dose of 200 mg pentobarbital throughout sedation.
May give midazolam 0.05 mg/kg IV x 1 PRN agitation for rescue sedation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Normal airway per exam
Exclusion Criteria
* Known difficult airway during past anesthesia or sedation experience
* Parent/guardian refusal of participation
6 Months
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mason KP, Zgleszewski SE, Prescilla R, Fontaine PJ, Zurakowski D. Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for CT imaging studies. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 May;18(5):393-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02451.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
Mukhtar AM, Obayah EM, Hassona AM. Preliminary experience with dexmedetomidine in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):250. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000228303.92422.73. No abstract available.
Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O, Yucel A, Toprak HI, Ersoy OM. A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):63-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000219592.82598.AA.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
colegroenersterni
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.