Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pediatric patients scheduled for dental procedures under general anesthesia can have significant anxiety before the procedure. They are commonly pre medicated to minimize distress and to facilitate a smooth induction of anesthesia. Oral Midazolam at 0.5mg/kg dose is more widely used for this purpose . However the commonly used maximum dose is up to 15mg. It also has many limitations such as paradoxical reaction, increased incidence of emergence delirium and negative postoperative behavior changes . Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been used an effective and safe alternative premedication to oral midazolam in children. At a dose of 2micrograms/kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication resulted in excellent sedation in children aged 5-8yrs with no adverse hemodynamic effects. It has other advantages such as providing analgesia and facilitating smooth emergence from anesthesia.
The goal of this study is to find out if intranasal dexmedetomidine is a superior alternative as premedication to oral midazolam in children weighing more than 20kg undergoing general anesthesia for dental rehabilitation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine
NCT02985697
Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication
NCT03357718
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Deep-sedated Pediatric Dental Patients
NCT04509414
Combination With Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Pediatric Patients
NCT04135014
Comparing Two Doses of Midazolam With Added Dexmedetomidine for Kids Before Surgery
NCT06979791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Exclusion criteria include known allergy or hypersensitivity to midazolam or dexmedetomidine, uncorrected congenital heart disease or history of cardiac arrhythmia, children at risk for airway obstruction (OSA or cranio facial syndrome) and pregnant minors Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups M (midazolam) or D (dexmedetomidine) using computer-generated numbers in sealed envelopes.
All the patients will be brought to their pre-op room and premedicated at least 30 min before induction of anesthesia.
In M group, patients will be given oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg (5mg/ml parenteral preparation) mixed with flavored syrup.
In D group, patients will be given intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg prepared from 100mcg/ml parenteral preparation (Hospira R). The drug will be administered using a intranasal mucosal administration device (LMA MAD NasalTM). Atomized nasal medications offer rapid absorption across mucosal membranes to the blood stream avoiding first-pass metabolism.
Parents will be present in the room during premedication. The Anesthesia personnel involved in the care of the patient (MD or CRNA) will prepare and administer all study drugs. All patients will be continuously monitored in the holding area with pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitor. HR, SPO2 and BP will be recorded every 15min after administration of premedication until transfer to the OR. Emergency medications including atropine and epinephrine will be immediately available in the pre-op holding area. Oral midazolam has been used with very little effect on hemodynamic parameters. Although intranasal dexmedetomidine can decrease HR and BP, it has been used at the dose of 2mcg/kg without any adverse hemodynamic effect . Any intervention needed to treat drop in HR (\<50) and BP (sys BP \<60) after the drug administration will be recorded.
Behavior of the children at the time of premedication will be documented ( easy or difficult). Any unwanted effects during administration such as spitting or vomiting of oral drug and pain or irritation from nasal administration will be documented.
The dental resident blinded to study drug administration will do the pre-operative sedation status and acceptance of mask induction.
Sedation status will be assessed using University of Michigan sedation scale (UMSS)on separation from parents and at induction after moving to the OR table. Acceptance of mask induction will be documented on a 4-point scale.
Standard ASA monitors will be applied before induction of anesthesia. All patients will undergo mask induction with O2/N2O/Sevo. An intravenous line will be inserted and secured. Both nostrils will be prepped nasal drops and tips of tracheal tubes covered with red rubber to minimize bleeding. Nasal intubation will be performed with direct laryngoscopy and McGill's forceps. Appropriate size cuffed tracheal tubes will be inserted and secured after additional IV medications with propofol 2-3mg/kg and fentanyl 1-2mcg/kg. Anesthesia will be maintained with O2/Sevo, IV morphine 0.05 to 0.1mg/kg and IV toradol 0.5mg/kg (if there is no allergy or contraindication to morphine or toradol) After the completion of procedure, patients will be extubated in the operating room and brought to recovery room and allowed to wake up slowly in the recovery position.
PACU nurses will evaluate Behavior at awakening using four-point wake up score (9,20). Patients will also be asked if they remember mask induction (yes or no) when they are ready for discharge. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, shivering will be documented in PACU. Time spent in phase 1 recovery room will also be recorded .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midazolam
In M group, patients will be given oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg (5mg/ml parenteral preparation) mixed with flavored syrup as premedication
Midazolam
oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg
Dexmedetomidine
In D group, patients will be given intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg prepared from 100mcg/ml parenteral preparation (Hospira R) . The drug will be administered using a intranasal mucosal administration device (LMA MAD NasalTM).
Dexmedetomidine
intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midazolam
oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg
Dexmedetomidine
intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA classification 1 or 2
Exclusion Criteria
* uncorrected congenital heart disease or history of cardiac arrhythmia,
* children at risk for airway obstruction (OSA or cranio facial syndrome),
* pregnant minors
5 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Mississippi Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy, MBBS, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's of Mississippi/University of Mississipi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Bell C, Weisman S, Hofstadter MB, Rimar S. Premedication in the United States: a status report. Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):427-32. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00035.
Lonnqvist PA, Habre W. Midazolam as premedication: is the emperor naked or just half-dressed? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Apr;15(4):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01600.x. No abstract available.
Kanegaye JT, Favela JL, Acosta M, Bank DE. High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Oct;19(5):329-36. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000092578.40174.85.
McGraw T, Kendrick A. Oral midazolam premedication and postoperative behaviour in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(2):117-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1998.00724.x.
Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, Gaal D. Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: results of a follow-up national survey. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1252-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111183.38618.d8.
Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yuen MK. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929.
Akin A, Bayram A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Aksu R, Altuntas R, Boyaci A. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):871-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03802.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Chan L, Wong GL, Shahnaz Hasan M, Shariffuddin II. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Sathyamoorthy M, Hamilton TB, Wilson G, Talluri R, Fawad L, Adamiak B, Wallace C, Borissova I, Heard C. Pre-medication before dental procedures: A randomized controlled study comparing intranasal dexmedetomidine with oral midazolam. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1162-1168. doi: 10.1111/aas.13425. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-0131
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.