Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
333000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-05-31
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Detection of Cancer Metastases
NCT00592462
68Ga-BNU-PSMA PET/CT in Patients With Various Types of Cancer
NCT04525612
Integrin αvβ6-targeted PET in Malignant Tumors
NCT05835570
A Study of 68Gallium PSMA-PET/CT Scans in People With Bladder Cancer or Skin Cancer
NCT05562791
Study of the Fixation of Various Vectors in PET/CT in Patients With a With Lung Cancer Before and During of CRT or RT
NCT01261585
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The original goal of the National Oncologic PET Registry was to assess the effect of positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) on referring physicians' plans of intended patient management for those cancers and indications not currently eligible for reimbursement from CMS. Data were collected from the referring physician before and after the PET study. If complete and timely data are reported to the NOPR within 30 days of the PET scan, the PET facility and interpreting physician (nuclear physician/radiologist) are eligible for reimbursement by CMS. Based in part on data obtained from the NOPR, CMS expanded coverage for FDG-PET in patients with cancer on April 3, 2009 and further expanded coverage on June 11, 2013. Specifically, on June 11, 2013, CMS issued a final decision memorandum ending the prospective data collection requirements under CED for all oncologic indications for FDG-PET. Overall accrual to the FDG-PET registry was nearly 288,000 scans.
On February 26, 2010, CMS announced its decision to cover the use NaF-18 PET to identify bone metastasis. Under this new policy, the use of NaF-18 PET would be covered only under an approved (CED) program. The NOPR obtained CMS approval to develop a registry for NaF-18 as an amendment to the then-existing NOPR for FDG-PET. The NaF-18 PET registry component of NOPR was activated for accrual on February 7, 2011. Estimated total accrual to the NaF-PET registry is 45,000 cases.
As with the registry for FDG-PET, the goal of the NaF-18 PET registry component is to assess the impact of this imaging examination on referring physicians' plans of intended management of patients with known or suspected osseous metastatic disease. Data are collected from the referring physician before and after the PET study, as well as from the interpreting physician. If complete and timely data are reported to the NOPR within 30 days of the PET scan, the PET facility and interpreting physician (nuclear physician/radiologist) are eligible for reimbursement by CMS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FDG-PET
F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)
PET scanning in cancer
Collection of institutional practice PET imaging data
NaF-18 PET
F-18 sodum-fluoride (NaF-18 PET)
PET scanning in cancer
Collection of institutional practice PET imaging data
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET scanning in cancer
Collection of institutional practice PET imaging data
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* NaF-18 PET performed as part of a clinical trial approved by CMS.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
World Molecular Imaging Society (formerly Academy of Molecular Imaging)
UNKNOWN
American College of Radiology Imaging Network
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruce Hillner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Commonwealth University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Liu D, Shields AF, Gareen IF, Hanna L, Stine SH, Coleman RE. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2155-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5631. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, Liu D, Gareen IF, Hunt E, Coleman RE. Relationship between cancer type and impact of PET and PET/CT on intended management: findings of the national oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med. 2008 Dec;49(12):1928-35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056713. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, Liu D, Gareen IF, Hanna L, Stine SH, Coleman RE. The impact of positron emission tomography (PET) on expected management during cancer treatment: findings of the National Oncologic PET Registry. Cancer. 2009 Jan 15;115(2):410-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24000.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, Duan F, Gareen IF, Hanna L, Coleman RE. Impact of dedicated brain PET on intended patient management in participants of the national oncologic PET Registry. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011 Feb;13(1):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s11307-010-0427-5.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Shields AF, Duan F, Gareen IF, Quinn B, Coleman RE. Impact of 18F-FDG PET used after initial treatment of cancer: comparison of the National Oncologic PET Registry 2006 and 2009 cohorts. J Nucl Med. 2012 May;53(5):831-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103911. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
Hillner BE, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Wang Q, Song Y, Onega T, Hanna LG, Siegel BA. Intended versus inferred management after PET for cancer restaging: analysis of Medicare claims linked to a coverage with evidence development registry. Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4):361-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318287d860.
Hillner BE, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, Song Y, Hanna LG, Siegel BA. Intended versus inferred care after PET performed for initial staging in the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med. 2013 Dec;54(12):2024-31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123430. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Shields AF, Coleman RE. Impact of 18F-fluoride PET in patients with known prostate cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med. 2014 Apr;55(4):574-81. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.130005. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Shields AF, Quinn B, Coleman RE. Impact of (18)F-Fluoride PET on Intended Management of Patients with Cancers Other Than Prostate Cancer: Results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med. 2014 Jul;55(7):1054-61. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.135475. Epub 2014 May 12.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Quinn B, Shields AF. 18F-fluoride PET used for treatment monitoring of systemic cancer therapy: results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med. 2015 Feb;56(2):222-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.150391. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NOPR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.