Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Whole Body, Including Diffusion, in the Medical Evaluation of Breast Cancers at High Risk for Metastasis and the Follow-up of Metastatic Cancers
NCT ID: NCT02966574
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-13
2020-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Apart from morphological criteria (lesion size and RECIST criteria), MRI provides quantitative functional criteria (diffusion and ADC values). According to a recent study, whole body MRI is as good as PET/CT and more effective than bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases for cancers of breast and prostate with a high metastatic risk.
Therefore, it seems appropriate to study the performance of whole body MRI in the pre-therapeutic assessment of breast cancer with a high risk for metastasis and the monitoring of metastatic breast cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole-body MR in Staging Bone and Soft Tissue Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients(MetaMaRBo)
NCT01291082
Monitoring of Breast Cancers Treated by Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT02916719
Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Detection of Cancer Metastases
NCT00592462
Monitoring of Breast Cancers Treated by Neoadjuvant Therapy Via Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT02798484
Initial Assessment of 18FDG-PET/MRIin Determining the Extent of Systemic Disease in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT01672021
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Breast cancers, especially hormone-sensitive ones, are very osteophilic and bones are the most frequent metastatic site. Other sites include the lungs, liver, pleura, distant lymph nodes, soft tissue and the central nervous system.
Metastasis are located exclusively in the bones in 30% of the cases. The most commonly affected bones include the axial skeleton, rich in hematopoietic bone marrow : column, pelvis, skull, ribs, clavicles, the proximal part of the femur and humerus. Five percent of breast cancers are directly metastatic and 20 to 30% of localized breast cancers progress to metastatic stage. This potentially affects a large number of patients, with a median survival of 30 to 36 months.Patients with bone metastases only have a better survival rate than others: 20% at 5 years. It is therefore important to use a reliable and reproducible examination for the monitoring of treatment response.
Apart from morphological criteria (lesion size and RECIST criteria), MRI provides quantitative functional criteria (diffusion and ADC values). According to a recent study, whole body MRI is as good as PET/CT and more effective than bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases for cancers of breast and prostate with a high metastatic risk. However, this is a preliminary study with a limited and heterogeneous cohort of patients.
Therefore, it seems appropriate to study the performance of whole body MRI in the pre-therapeutic assessment of breast cancer with a high risk for metastasis and the monitoring of metastatic breast cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
metastatic breast cancer
whole body MRI
The examination will be conducted in the pretreatment assessment of breast cancers with a high metastasis risk and in the monitoring of metastatic breast cancers. The examination is performed without intravenous injection of contrast medium, from the top of the skull to mid-thigh using diffusion weighted sequences in the axial plane, T1-weighted sequences in the coronal plane, STIR T2 weighted sequences in the coronal plane and T1-weighted sequences in the sagittal plane on the spine. Total examination duration is one hour. The interpretation of the results is made by two independent reporters with a complementary expertise, according to a systematic lecture grid.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
whole body MRI
The examination will be conducted in the pretreatment assessment of breast cancers with a high metastasis risk and in the monitoring of metastatic breast cancers. The examination is performed without intravenous injection of contrast medium, from the top of the skull to mid-thigh using diffusion weighted sequences in the axial plane, T1-weighted sequences in the coronal plane, STIR T2 weighted sequences in the coronal plane and T1-weighted sequences in the sagittal plane on the spine. Total examination duration is one hour. The interpretation of the results is made by two independent reporters with a complementary expertise, according to a systematic lecture grid.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Axillary lymph node punction C5 or metastatic
* Performance status from 0 to 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Claustrophobia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brugmann University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mieke Cannie
Head of clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nathalie Hottat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brugmann
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bidard FC, Vincent-Salomon A, Gomme S, Nos C, de Rycke Y, Thiery JP, Sigal-Zafrani B, Mignot L, Sastre-Garau X, Pierga JY; Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group. Disseminated tumor cells of breast cancer patients: a strong prognostic factor for distant and local relapse. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 1;14(11):3306-11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4749.
Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, Zackrisson S, Cardoso F; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. No abstract available.
Pasoglou V, Michoux N, Peeters F, Larbi A, Tombal B, Selleslagh T, Omoumi P, Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE. Whole-body 3D T1-weighted MR imaging in patients with prostate cancer: feasibility and evaluation in screening for metastatic disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):155-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141242. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
Dimopoulos MA, Hillengass J, Usmani S, Zamagni E, Lentzsch S, Davies FE, Raje N, Sezer O, Zweegman S, Shah J, Badros A, Shimizu K, Moreau P, Chim CS, Lahuerta JJ, Hou J, Jurczyszyn A, Goldschmidt H, Sonneveld P, Palumbo A, Ludwig H, Cavo M, Barlogie B, Anderson K, Roodman GD, Rajkumar SV, Durie BG, Terpos E. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):657-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9961. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Woolf DK, Padhani AR, Makris A. Assessing response to treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer: what should be the standard of care? Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1048-1057. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu558. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S, Huovinen R, Sandell M, Kajander S, Kemppainen J, Kauppila E, Auren J, Merisaari H, Saunavaara J, Noponen T, Minn H, Aronen HJ, Seppanen M. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol. 2016;55(1):59-67. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1027411. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUB-IRM CE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.