Case Volume and Adenoma Rate During Screening Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT00860665
Last Updated: 2009-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
12134 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-10-31
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Stool Based Markers for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancers and Adenomas
NCT00843375
Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
NCT05080673
Risk-adapted Screening in First-degree Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT01903395
Improving Colonoscopy Surveillance for Patients With High Risk Colon Polyps
NCT06376565
Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Screenees in the Period Between Colonoscopy and Next Clinic Visit for Final Report: Does Real-time Endoscopic Optical Diagnosis Improve Their Quality of Life
NCT04684355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary outcome parameter:
* Correlation of adenoma detection rate with case volume and other confounding factors (e.g., withdrawal time)
Secondary outcome parameters:
* Complications and method of assessment (immediate recording versus later questionnaire enquiry)
* Quality of bowel preparation in relation to outcome Patient acceptance in relation to procedural factors (e.g., sedation)
* Quality of pathology reports and histologic outcome of polypectomy
Later follow-up (after 5-10 years) of the preventive effect of colonoscopy is planned and has been part of the protocol and patient consent form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Observational study on consecutive persons over the age of 55 years presenting for screening colonoscopy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
55 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Interest group of Berlin private practice gastroenterologists
UNKNOWN
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Rösch, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Hamburg University Eppendorf, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité Medical University Berlin Campus Virchow
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adler A, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mross M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Keining C, Stange G, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Altenhofen L, Rosch T. Data quality of the German screening colonoscopy registry. Endoscopy. 2013 Oct;45(10):813-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344583. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mross M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300167. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Yenerim T, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Roll S, Rosch T. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.026. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BECOP-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.