Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Single Versus Multiple Fractions.
NCT ID: NCT00858741
Last Updated: 2009-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary objectives were to evaluate the frequency, duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial to Improve Quality of Life With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT03831243
Optimization of Radiotherapy in Treatment of Painful Bone Metastasis
NCT00610272
Single vs Multiple-Fraction Therapy in Treating Patients With Previously Irradiated Painful Bone Metastases
NCT00080912
Comparable Investigation of One Fraction Radiotherapy and Multifraction Radiotherapy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
NCT02024815
Palliative Radiation Therapy in Reducing Pain in Patients With Bone Metastasis
NCT02699697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Eligibility requirements included:
Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1months.
Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection.
Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Acceptable studies included plain radiographs, radionuclide bone scans, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging. Other studies were acceptable with the approval of the principal investigator.
Eligible treatment sites were: pelvis, femur, sacrum and/or sacroiliac joints, tibia, cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebral bodies, humerus, fibula, radius ± ulna, clavicle, sternum, scapula and púbis.
Patients had a "Worst Pain Score" of \> 5 on a scale of 10 (as scored on the Brief Pain Inventory \[BP\]: 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain) or if BPI is \< 5, had be taking narcotic medications with a daily morphine equivalent dose ≥ 60 mg p.o. Patients receiving systemic therapy were eligible for this study as long as there has been no introduction of any systemic therapy within the 30 days prior to entry into this study.
The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration. This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone. Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
Required information before randomization included history and physical examination, Karnofsky performance status, radiographically documented bone metastases within 8 weeks before randomization, and completed Brief Pain Inventory.
RADIATION THERAPY
Treatment Plan
Arm A: 3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. Arm B: 8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.
Simulation of treatment fields was required prior to the first treatment. Prior to the first treatment, an acceptable simulator and portal film documenting that the treatment site was adequately covered and verified by the treating radiation oncologist.
Treatment was given using megavoltage equipment with Cobalt-60 or 6-Mev photons. The minimum Source-Axis Distance (SAD) was 80 cm. All fields were treated each day. Treatment volume was including the radiographic abnormality with at least a 2 cm margin. Treatment of the entire bone is not required. Anterior and posterior parallel opposed fields were used for lumbar spine, sacrum, pelvis, and extremity sites. Equal weighting was recommended, although unequal weighting was used for the lumbar or sacral spine with a ratio of doses of 1:2 AP:PA. Dose was prescribed at mid thickness at the central axis, or at the center of target volume if unequal weighting is used. The cervical spine was treated with either parallel opposed lateral fields or with a single posterior field. When lateral fields were used, the isocenter should be at mid-thickness, with the dose prescribed to the mid-vertebral body. For a single posterior field, the dose was prescribed at a depth of 5 cm or other depth as determined from a lateral simulator film. When more than one osseous site was included into one treatment field, the treating radiation oncologist used differing field arrangements at her/his discretion, with the fields arranged to provide relatively uniform treatment of the target sites with a minimum of uninvolved normal tissues.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
8 Gy arm
8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.
single fraction
8 Gy x 1 fraction to 8 Gy total dose in single dose.
30 Gy arm
3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.
multiple fractions
3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
single fraction
8 Gy x 1 fraction to 8 Gy total dose in single dose.
multiple fractions
3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection. Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
Exclusion Criteria
* This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
* Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone.
* Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marilia Medicine School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marilia Medicine School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radiation Oncology Department at Marilia Medicine school
Marília, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAMEMA - BONE METASTASES
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.