Single vs Multiple-Fraction Therapy in Treating Patients With Previously Irradiated Painful Bone Metastases
NCT ID: NCT00080912
Last Updated: 2023-08-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
850 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-22
2014-01-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying single-dose radiation therapy to see if it works as well as multiple-dose radiation therapy in treating patients previously irradiated with painful bone metastases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimization of Radiotherapy in Treatment of Painful Bone Metastasis
NCT00610272
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Bone Metastases From Breast or Prostate Cancer
NCT00003162
A Trial to Improve Quality of Life With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT03831243
Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Single Versus Multiple Fractions.
NCT00858741
Single-fraction IMRT Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Spine Bone Metastases
NCT02358720
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare pain relief in patients undergoing single-fraction vs multiple-fraction re-irradiation of painful bone metastases at 2 months after treatment.
Secondary
* Compare overall pain relief in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare time to pain progression in patients treated with these regimens.
* Assess relationship between response to initial radiation and pain relief after re-irradiation in these patients.
* Compare changes in functional interference after re-irradiation using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens (patients in Canada, France, the Netherlands, and patients registered through RTOG).
* Determine characteristics of non-responders (to both initial and re-irradiation) among patients treated with these regimens.
* Monitor the incidence of acute severe radiation-related side effects in patients treated with these regimens.
* Monitor the incidence of in-field pathological fractures and spinal cord compression in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to response to initial radiotherapy (yes vs no), initial fractionation (single fraction vs multiple fraction), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive single-fraction radiotherapy (8Gy) on day 1.
* Arm II: Patients receive multiple-fraction radiotherapy (to a total of 20Gy) over 5 days or over 8 days if re-irradiation of the spine and/or whole pelvis is involved AND prior initial radiotherapy was given in multiple fractions.
At least 4 weeks after the first re-treatment, patients in both arms may receive a second re-treatment at the discretion of the treating oncologist.
Patients complete a Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire at baseline, on days 7 and 14, monthly during months 1-6, and at months 9 and 12. Acute Toxicities are assessed on days 7 and 14. Quality of Life is assessed at baseline and then monthly during months 1-6 for patients from participating groups.
Patients are followed for up to 1 year.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 850 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I
Patients receive single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) on day 1.
radiation therapy
Given in a single fraction or multiple fractions
Arm II
Patients receive multiple-fraction radiotherapy (to a total of 20 Gy) over 5 days or over 8 days if re-irradiation of the spine and/or whole pelvis is involved AND prior initial radiotherapy was given in multiple fractions.
radiation therapy
Given in a single fraction or multiple fractions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
radiation therapy
Given in a single fraction or multiple fractions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy
* Diagnosis by needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or surgical biopsy or resection
* Bone metastases at clinically painful areas confirmed by any of the following:
* Plain radiographs
* Radionuclide bone scans
* CT scans
* Magnetic resonance imaging
* Worst pain score of ≥ 2/10 using the baseline Brief Pain Inventory
* Pain arising from previously irradiated metastases and not from progressive disease in adjoining or remote areas
* Initial radiotherapy field is reproducible for re-irradiation
* Current treatment field for palliative radiotherapy must be the same size or smaller than the initial treatment field
* No clinical or radiological evidence of pathological fractures in the target site extremities.
* No radiological evidence of high-risk lesions for pathological fractures in the extremities (lytic lesions \> 3cm or \> 50% cortical erosion of bone diameter) if target site AND patient is a candidate for surgical intervention.
* No clinical or radiological evidence of spinal cord compression at target site.
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
* 18 and over
Performance status
* Karnofsky 50-100%
Life expectancy
* Not specified
Hematopoietic
* Not specified
Hepatic
* Not specified
Renal
* Not specified
Other
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Fertile patients must use effective barrier contraception
* Able and willing to complete quality of life questionnaire in English, French, Dutch, or Spanish (if randomized by Canadian, Dutch, French or RTOG centre)
* Must be accessible for treatment follow-up
* Informed consent
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
* Not specified
Chemotherapy
* Not specified
Endocrine therapy
* Not specified
Radiotherapy
* See Disease Characteristics
* No more than 1 prior course of radiotherapy to the target site
* No prior radiotherapy dose ≥ 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 27 Gy in 8 fractions, or 30 Gy in 10 fractions to the spine or any part of the pelvis encompassing small or large bowel and/or the rectum, if these sites are being treated on study
* Initial doses of 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 27 Gy in 8 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions to the acetabulum or hip and proximal femur allowed as long as the medial field border of the initial treatment did not cross midline
* No prior radiotherapy dose \> 30Gy in 10 fractions to the ribs or extremities if these sites are being treated on study
* More than 30 days since prior strontium chloride Sr 89
* More than 30 days since prior half-body radiotherapy, including the current re-irradiation field
* At least 4 weeks since initial radiotherapy
Surgery
* No prior palliative surgery in treatment area
* No concurrent surgical intervention on treatment area
Other
* No prior participation on this protocol
* No plan to make an immediate change in analgesic regimen
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
NETWORK
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
OTHER
Cancer Research UK
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward LW Chow, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
William F. Hartsell, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Advocate Good Samaratin Cancer Centre
Daniel Roos, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre
Yvette von der Linden
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Radiotherapeutic Institution Friesland
Peter Hoskin
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
The Vitalite Health Network - Dr. Leon Richard
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
McGill University - Dept. Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chow E, Hoskin PJ, Wu J, Roos D, van der Linden Y, Hartsell W, Vieth R, Wilson C, Pater J. A phase III international randomised trial comparing single with multiple fractions for re-irradiation of painful bone metastases: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) SC 20. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006 Mar;18(2):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2005.11.014. No abstract available.
Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, Hartsell WF, Hoskin P, Wu JS, Brundage MD, Nabid A, Tissing-Tan CJ, Oei B, Babington S, Demas WF, Wilson CF, Meyer RM, Chen BE, Wong RK. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Chow R, Ding K, Ganesh V, Meyer RM, van der Linden YM, Roos D, Hartsell WF, Hoskin P, Wu JSY, Nabid A, van Acht M, Wanders R, Babington S, Demas WF, Wilson CF, Wong RKS, Brundage M, Zhu L, Chow E. Gender and age make no difference in the re-irradiation of painful bone metastases: A secondary analysis of the NCIC CTG SC.20 randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Mar;126(3):541-546. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
Chow E, Meyer RM, Chen BE, van der Linden YM, Roos D, Hartsell WF, Hoskin P, Wu JS, Nabid A, Tissing-Tan CJ, Oei B, Babington S, Demas WF, Wilson CF, Wong RK, Brundage M. Impact of reirradiation of painful osseous metastases on quality of life and function: a secondary analysis of the NCIC CTG SC.20 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3867-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.6264. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAN-NCIC-SC20
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RTOG-0433
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TROG-03.08
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000357423
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SC20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT00797173
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.