MRgFUS Versus EBRT in Patients With Metastatic Non-spinal Bone Disease

NCT ID: NCT03404362

Last Updated: 2022-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this trial is to collect and compare safety and effectiveness data of Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) using the ExAblate 2100 device and radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic bone tumors.

This study is designed as a prospective, double arm, non-randomized study with External Beam radiation therapy (EBRT) serving as control arm.

The study hypothesis is that MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, phase II, open-label, non-randomized, double arm study to collect data on safety and effectiveness of ExAblate MRgFUS and EBRT treatments of metastatic bone tumors. Following treatment assignment and treatment itself, subjects will be followed for up for 12 months to evaluate pain relief as well as quality of life. Additional data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic consumption for the management of the bone tumor induced pain will also be collected. MRI of the treated lesion will be obtained 3 and 6 months post therapy to evaluate effect on the lesion in both radiation and MRgFUS arms. This is clinically acceptable and widely utilized diagnostic method in follow up of this patient population.

Data will be collected for a total of 184 patients, 92 patients treated by EBRT and another 92 patients treated by FUS.

Treating physician, as of his/her normal practice, might offer additional treatment of other type in cases where pain score of the treated lesion will not improve by at least 2 points, and will remain 4 or greater. Additional treatment may be performed up to one month following treatment. Prior to offering alternative treatment, an MRI will be performed to evaluate effect on the lesion. Patient receiving another treatment, different from the initial one (i.e. patient initially treated with FUS is now treated by EBRT) will be considered as treatment failures for the primary analysis and their post-x-over follow-up results will be analyzed separately.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Secondary Bone Cancer Bone Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRgFUS

The treatment process begins with the physician acquiring a set of MR images, identifying target volume(s) of tissue to ablate, and then drawing the treatment contours.

The therapy planning software computes the type and number of sonications required to treat the defined region while minimizing total treatment time. MR images taken during the sonication provide a diagnostic quality image of the target tissue and a quantitative, real-time temperature map overlay to confirm the therapeutic effect of the treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bone Metastases Pain treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)

EBRT

Patient would undergo single fraction of external beam radiation to a dose of 8Gy or a session of 10 fractions of external beam radiations at 3Gy per fraction for two weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bone Metastases Pain treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bone Metastases Pain treatment

Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women age 18 years and older.
2. Able and willing to give consent and to attend all study visits
3. Patients with bone metastasis or primary bone lesion identifiable by imaging techniques.
4. Worst NRS Pain Score of ≥ 4 from the tumor to be treated.
5. Each targeted tumor is accessible to both ExAblate and EBRT (ExAblate accessible lesions are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5), please see ExAblate "Information for Prescribers".
6. Targeted tumor area is smaller than 100cm2.
7. Tumor clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
8. No radiation therapy to selected lesion during one month prior to enrollment.
9. Radiation therapy to selected lesion is not contraindicated
10. Bisphosphonate, chemo or hormone therapy intake should remain stable throughout follow up duration.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who either need pre-treatment surgical stabilization of the affected bony structure
2. Targeted tumor is in a vertebra body or in the posterior aspects of the vertebral column other than Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5) and Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5).
3. Targeted tumor is in the skull.
4. Patients on anti-coagulation therapy or with an underlying uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
5. Patients with life expectancy \< 6-Months.
6. Patients with unstable cardiac status including:

* Unstable angina pectoris on medication.
* Patients with documented myocardial infarction within last 40 days to protocol entry.
* Congestive heart failure NYHA Class IV
7. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP \> 100 on medication).
8. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted ferromagnetic objects/devices.
9. Known intolerance or allergies to MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist)
10. KPS score of below 60
11. Severe cerebro-vascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
12. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
13. Target tumor is less then 1cm from spinal cord, skin, or hollow viscera.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alessandro Napoli

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alessandro Napoli

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anzidei M, Napoli A, Sacconi B, Boni F, Noce V, Di Martino M, Saba L, Catalano C. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in the assessment of clinical outcome. Radiol Med. 2016 Dec;121(12):905-915. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0675-9. Epub 2016 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27567615 (View on PubMed)

Huisman M, ter Haar G, Napoli A, Hananel A, Ghanouni P, Lovey G, Nijenhuis RJ, van den Bosch MA, Rieke V, Majumdar S, Marchetti L, Pfeffer RM, Hurwitz MD. International consensus on use of focused ultrasound for painful bone metastases: Current status and future directions. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015 May;31(3):251-9. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.995237. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25677840 (View on PubMed)

Hurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, Iozeffi D, Gianfelice D, Fennessy FM, Kuten A, Meyer JE, LeBlang SD, Roberts A, Choi J, Larner JM, Napoli A, Turkevich VG, Inbar Y, Tempany CM, Pfeffer RM. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 23;106(5):dju082. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju082.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24760791 (View on PubMed)

Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Noce V, Boni F, Bertaccini L, Passariello R, Catalano C. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound for treatment of bone metastasis. Radiographics. 2013 Oct;33(6):1555-68. doi: 10.1148/rg.336125162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24108551 (View on PubMed)

Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Ciolina F, Cartocci G, Marsecano C, Zaccagna F, Marchetti L, Cortesi E, Catalano C. Primary pain palliation and local tumor control in bone metastases treated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):351-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318285bbab.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23571832 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BM-Fus Vs RT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.