MRgFUS Versus EBRT in Patients With Metastatic Non-spinal Bone Disease
NCT ID: NCT03404362
Last Updated: 2022-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is designed as a prospective, double arm, non-randomized study with External Beam radiation therapy (EBRT) serving as control arm.
The study hypothesis is that MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Focused Ultrasound and RadioTHERapy for Noninvasive Palliative Pain Treatment in Patients With Bone Metastases
NCT04307914
A Phase IV Post Approval Clinical Study of ExAblate Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain
NCT01833806
ExAblate Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain
NCT01834937
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery in the Treatment of Pain From Bone Tumors w/ the ExAblate 2000 Strappable System
NCT03547557
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound vs Radiotherapy for Palliative Pain Tx in Bone Metastases
NCT05250687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data will be collected for a total of 184 patients, 92 patients treated by EBRT and another 92 patients treated by FUS.
Treating physician, as of his/her normal practice, might offer additional treatment of other type in cases where pain score of the treated lesion will not improve by at least 2 points, and will remain 4 or greater. Additional treatment may be performed up to one month following treatment. Prior to offering alternative treatment, an MRI will be performed to evaluate effect on the lesion. Patient receiving another treatment, different from the initial one (i.e. patient initially treated with FUS is now treated by EBRT) will be considered as treatment failures for the primary analysis and their post-x-over follow-up results will be analyzed separately.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MRgFUS
The treatment process begins with the physician acquiring a set of MR images, identifying target volume(s) of tissue to ablate, and then drawing the treatment contours.
The therapy planning software computes the type and number of sonications required to treat the defined region while minimizing total treatment time. MR images taken during the sonication provide a diagnostic quality image of the target tissue and a quantitative, real-time temperature map overlay to confirm the therapeutic effect of the treatment
Bone Metastases Pain treatment
Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)
EBRT
Patient would undergo single fraction of external beam radiation to a dose of 8Gy or a session of 10 fractions of external beam radiations at 3Gy per fraction for two weeks.
Bone Metastases Pain treatment
Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bone Metastases Pain treatment
Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able and willing to give consent and to attend all study visits
3. Patients with bone metastasis or primary bone lesion identifiable by imaging techniques.
4. Worst NRS Pain Score of ≥ 4 from the tumor to be treated.
5. Each targeted tumor is accessible to both ExAblate and EBRT (ExAblate accessible lesions are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5), please see ExAblate "Information for Prescribers".
6. Targeted tumor area is smaller than 100cm2.
7. Tumor clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
8. No radiation therapy to selected lesion during one month prior to enrollment.
9. Radiation therapy to selected lesion is not contraindicated
10. Bisphosphonate, chemo or hormone therapy intake should remain stable throughout follow up duration.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Targeted tumor is in a vertebra body or in the posterior aspects of the vertebral column other than Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5) and Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5).
3. Targeted tumor is in the skull.
4. Patients on anti-coagulation therapy or with an underlying uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
5. Patients with life expectancy \< 6-Months.
6. Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
* Unstable angina pectoris on medication.
* Patients with documented myocardial infarction within last 40 days to protocol entry.
* Congestive heart failure NYHA Class IV
7. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP \> 100 on medication).
8. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted ferromagnetic objects/devices.
9. Known intolerance or allergies to MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist)
10. KPS score of below 60
11. Severe cerebro-vascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
12. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
13. Target tumor is less then 1cm from spinal cord, skin, or hollow viscera.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Roma La Sapienza
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alessandro Napoli
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alessandro Napoli
Rome, , Italy
Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Anzidei M, Napoli A, Sacconi B, Boni F, Noce V, Di Martino M, Saba L, Catalano C. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in the assessment of clinical outcome. Radiol Med. 2016 Dec;121(12):905-915. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0675-9. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Huisman M, ter Haar G, Napoli A, Hananel A, Ghanouni P, Lovey G, Nijenhuis RJ, van den Bosch MA, Rieke V, Majumdar S, Marchetti L, Pfeffer RM, Hurwitz MD. International consensus on use of focused ultrasound for painful bone metastases: Current status and future directions. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015 May;31(3):251-9. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.995237. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Hurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, Iozeffi D, Gianfelice D, Fennessy FM, Kuten A, Meyer JE, LeBlang SD, Roberts A, Choi J, Larner JM, Napoli A, Turkevich VG, Inbar Y, Tempany CM, Pfeffer RM. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 23;106(5):dju082. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju082.
Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Noce V, Boni F, Bertaccini L, Passariello R, Catalano C. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound for treatment of bone metastasis. Radiographics. 2013 Oct;33(6):1555-68. doi: 10.1148/rg.336125162.
Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Ciolina F, Cartocci G, Marsecano C, Zaccagna F, Marchetti L, Cortesi E, Catalano C. Primary pain palliation and local tumor control in bone metastases treated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):351-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318285bbab.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BM-Fus Vs RT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.