A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients

NCT ID: NCT00847158

Last Updated: 2009-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-12-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a prospective, double-masked, 15-month clinical trial comparing efficacy of phacoemulsification alone to combined phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a prospective, randomized open-label study of 36 patients with POAG scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation ("cataract surgery"). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either cataract surgery alone (control group) or cataract surgery and iStent implantation (combined surgery group).

Implantation of the study stent occurred after cataract extraction and IOL insertion using the same small, temporal, clear-corneal incision (approximately 3 mm) used to perform phacoemulsification and IOL placement. The study stent was guided into Schlemm's canal using ab-interno gonioscopy (using a Swan-Jacobs gonioscope). (Figure 1) If no complications occurred during phacoemulsification, acetylcholine was injected in the anterior chamber after the IOL implantation to constrict the pupil. The anterior chamber was then filled with a viscoelastic agent to reform the anterior chamber and provide more clearance in the angle.

The anterior chamber was traversed with the applicator (the implant was on the tip of applicator) and the trabecular meshwork located. The leading edge of the device was gently slid through the trabecular meshwork and into Schlemm's canal at the nasal position (3 to 4 o'clock for the right eye; 9 to 8 o'clock for the left eye) with the tip of the implant directed inferiorly. If difficulty was encountered with the insertion at the primary location, we tried inserting about 0.5 clock hour inferiorly; and continued to move inferiorly as needed for subsequent attempts. Next, the device was released by pushing the button on the applicator, position of the stent was verified and the applicator was withdrawn.

The patients were instructed to discontinue all glaucoma medications after surgery. Standard post cataract extraction antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drug regimen was prescribed. Target pressure for each patient was determined prior to study entry. Following the assigned procedure, any patient with an IOP (as measured between 8 and 10 AM) that was greater than 2 mm Hg over their target was instructed to return twice in the following three days for re-measurement of their IOP. If the patient's IOP was \> 2 mm Hg over their target pressure, ocular hypotensive agents were added. The medications were added in a pre-set schedule, with beta-blockers first, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors second, and prostaglandins third. If, however, on the third consecutive visit the patient's IOP was within 2 mm Hg of target, patient re-entered the normal visit schedule. Investigators were masked to treatment assignment both when measuring IOP and when determining when or if to add medications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

phacoemulsification alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

phacoemulsification alone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

phacoemulsification alone

2

phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

phacoemulsification alone

phacoemulsification alone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent

phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cataract surgery Phaco iStent, Trabecular micro-bypass stent, GTS100L, GTS100R

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a previous diagnosis of POAG
* an IOP of \> 18 mm Hg at three separate visits if on one medication, or subjects on at least two medications with uncontrolled IOP on three separate visits.
* all patients were deemed likely to follow surgeon instructions and were able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* any glaucoma diagnosis other than POAG
* the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
* a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
* any previous ocular surgery
* history of trauma or ocular surface disease
* the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
* a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Turin, Italy

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Fea, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Torino

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fea AM, Consolandi G, Zola M, Pignata G, Cannizzo P, Lavia C, Rolle T, Grignolo FM. Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:795357. doi: 10.1155/2015/795357. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26587282 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iStent Washout study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.