A Safety Study of Eptifibatide in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

NCT ID: NCT00834899

Last Updated: 2013-06-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the safety of eptifibatide in sickle cell patients and how well it works during the course of painful crises. The overall hypothesis that we seek to test is that increased platelet activation and the resultant inflammatory responses are important contributors to the problems of sickle cell disease. Sickle cell disease has been referred to both as a condition associated with increased risk of blood clots and increased inflammation. A painful crisis represents the most common cli nical problem in sickle cell disease, but the treatment of these crises remains inadequate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sickle cell disease has been referred to both as a condition associated with increased risk of blood clots and increased inflammation. Despite the abundant laboratory evidence of abnormal blood clotting and inflammation, the contribution of these changes to the problems experienced by patients with sickle cell disease remains uncertain. In additional to abnormal blood clotting, platelets (small blood cells that help blood clotting) are more activated in sickle cell disease patients compared to healthy patients without this disease.

In addition, when sickle cell disease patients experience a painful crisis, there is evidence that the platelet activation and abnormal blood clotting increase even further. Activated platelets release a substance called cluster of designation 40 ligand, which can increase how sticky the lining of blood vessels are and can increase the abnormal blood clotting. The level of cluster of designation 40 ligand is much higher in sickle cell disease patients compared to healthy individuals without this disease. In addition, the levels increase even further when sickle cell patients are experiencing a painful crisis.

Painful crisis represent the most common clinical problem in sickle cell disease, and are largely responsible for making the lives of these patients so unpredictable. However, the treatment of these painful crisis remains inadequate, consisting mainly of strong pain medications. In this study, we will evaluate the safety of eptifibatide in sickle cell patients and how well it works during the course of painful crises. At the completion of this trial, we will have an improved understanding of the contribution of platelet activation and inflammation to the problems in sickle cell disease.

The overall hypothesis that we seek to test is that increased platelet activation and the resultant inflammatory responses are important contributors to the problems of sickle cell disease. We believe that by decreasing platelet stickiness, and the release of mediators of inflammation and abnormal blood clotting, eptifibatide will affect the clinical course of complications in this disease.

If the results from our study support the hypothesis that eptifibatide is safe and effective in this population, we plan on carrying out larger studies to more definitively evaluate the safety of eptifibatide and how well it works in the treatment and/or prevention of painful crises in sickle cell disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

As soon as eligible patients are identified and provide consent to participate in the study, patients randomized to the eptifibatide arm will receive two 180 mcg/kg boluses of eptifibatide 10 minutes apart (i.e., a double bolus), followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mcg/kg/min for 6 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eptifibatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients randomized to eptifibatide will receive two 180 mcg/kg boluses of eptifibatide 10 minutes apart (i.e., a double bolus), followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mcg/kg/min for 6 hours.

2

As soon as eligible patients are identified and provide consent to participate in the study, patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive a saline solution delivered at a volume and rate identical to that of the active drug.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive a saline solution delivered at a volume and rate identical to that of the active drug.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eptifibatide

Patients randomized to eptifibatide will receive two 180 mcg/kg boluses of eptifibatide 10 minutes apart (i.e., a double bolus), followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mcg/kg/min for 6 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive a saline solution delivered at a volume and rate identical to that of the active drug.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Integrilin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 55 years
2. Have confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell anemia or sickle beta zero thalassemia
3. Have a serum creatinine \</= 1.2 mg/dl
4. Have serum transaminase values \< 3 times upper limits of normal
5. Have a platelet count \>/= 150 x 10\^9/L
6. Have normal baseline coagulation profile
7. Sudden onset of pain involving one or more sites and typical of usual pain episodes
8. Have adequate intravenous access
9. Be able to understand the requirements of the study and be willing to give informed consent
10. Women of child-bearing age must be practicing (and will continue to practice for the course of the study) an adequate method of contraception (oral contraception, depo-provera, bilateral tubal ligation or barrier method)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Have a baseline hemoglobin \< 6.0 gm/dl
2. Have a history of major gastrointestinal bleeding or a bleeding diathesis
3. Have an ongoing episode of acute chest syndrome
4. Have a past history of clinically overt stroke(s)
5. Have severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 200mmHg and/or diastolic BP \>110mmHg) not adequately controlled on hypertensive medication
6. Have had major surgery within the six weeks preceding enrollment
7. Are pregnant or breastfeeding
8. Are on chronic anticoagulation or antiplatelet (including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) therapy
9. Have a history of metastatic cancer
10. Are on a chronic transfusion program or have received a blood transfusion in the prior 8 weeks
11. Have a positive urine toxicology screen for phencyclidine, cocaine or amphetamines.
12. Have a history of alcohol abuse
13. Have received any investigational drugs within the past 4 weeks.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth I Ataga, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Desai PC, Brittain JE, Jones SK, McDonald A, Wilson DR, Dominik R, Key NS, Parise LV, Ataga KI. A pilot study of eptifibatide for treatment of acute pain episodes in sickle cell disease. Thromb Res. 2013 Sep;132(3):341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23973010 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21HL091265-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.