A Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK): A Model for Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT00819702
Last Updated: 2023-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
905 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We have developed and implemented an enhanced model of pediatric primary care, taking advantage of the enormous opportunities of the existing pediatric primary care system, with its regular contact with young children and parents (Dubowitz \& Newberger, 1989; Dubowitz, 1989, 1990; Green, 1994). Pediatricians typically devote over half their time to checkups, focusing on prevention. There is increasing recognition that pediatric care must incorporate aspects of parental and family functioning and collaborate with community resources (Academy of Pediatrics, 1998; Green, 1994b). The broad goal of this project is to implement concepts that have been embraced by the field of pediatrics, but have not been applied and tested.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) I
NCT00507299
Assisting Low-Income Families at Pediatric Well-Child Care Visits
NCT00397644
Pilot Test of Innovative Child Maltreatment (CM) Prevention Strategy
NCT06912685
Evaluation of Parenting Interventions to Decrease Family Risk for Child Maltreatment
NCT00586677
Boosting Infant Resilience and Development
NCT04737564
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Review of the literature identifies four major risk factors leading to child maltreatment, 1) maternal depression, 2) alcohol and substance abuse, 3) domestic violence, and 4) parental stress and poor coping. The project has several "arms" to address these risk factors. Initially, there is training to help busy primary care providers (PCPs) address the targeted problems in the pediatric office setting. The second phase is the introduction of a brief screening questionnaire into selected well child visits to identify these risk factors in families. If risk factors are present, the PCP will briefly assess the problem. A project social worker is available (by phone or in the office) to help address the problem, and to aid the families in accessing community resources. Another part of the project assesses the validity of the screening questionnaire against several "gold standard" measures used to diagnose the targeted risk problems.
The training focused on the four major factors described. We used realistic office scenarios and offered participants the opportunity to use newly learned management strategies in addressing them. Small group experience with adequate time for processing and practice were utilized. Scheduling was done in conjunction with the participating offices. An advisory committee of practicing community pediatricians and office personnel offered consultation on all phases of the program, as well as strategies to efficiently integrate the program into office practice. The project enlisted 102 PCPs in 18 practices with half serving as controls. Those in the intervention arm received the training. Study health care offices used the one-page SEEK screening questionnaire in their practices. Control pediatricians made no change to their current practice, and continued to provide standard care. Parents were given the questionnaire, in the office, before the 2 and 15 month, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 year well child visits. Questionnaires were completed while the parent waited. Questionnaires were quickly and easily read by the PCPat the visit. Significant issues were briefly assessed and addressed during the visit. The project social worker was available to practices for consultation and for direct intervention with families. "Booster sessions," reviewing the educational and intervention materials were held four times during the 2.5 year study period. PCP knowledge, attitudes, level of comfort and perceived competence regarding the targeted problems were assessed at the beginning and end of the training and at the end of the 2nd and 3rd year.
The central objective of the SEEK project was to examine whether parent functioning was improved by addressing common risk factors for child maltreatment, thus strengthening families and helping prevent maltreatment. A subset of parents in the project practices - intervention and control - were approached to participate in the evaluation of the project. Interest in participating was briefly assessed in the practice. A member of the project team contacted interested parents to fully explain what is involved. Parents who agreed to participate completed a survey (on-line or paper) at three different points. Survey completion took about 60 minutes, for which they were modestly compensated.
In addition, to evaluate the project, members of the project team did a chart review, and directly observed practice behavior. We also asked parents' permission to review Department of Social Services records for possible involvement. All participating pediatricians and practices were invited to share in the conclusions at the end of the project.
The SEEK team hopes that this intervention will be the basis for a new and practical approach to the assessment of serious psychosocial risk factors within the framework of health supervision visits. Ultimately, our hope is that the identification and amelioration of these risk factors will help prevent child maltreatment, and improve the lives of many children and their families. We encourage you to join us in developing an innovative approach to help address psychosocial risk factors in pediatric practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Model Care
The Model Care approach was implemented in 7 practices, where PCPs were trained to address major risk factors for CM, including maternal depression, alcohol/substance abuse, intimate partner violence, food insecurity, harsh punishment and major stress. We taught how they can be briefly assessed and initially addressed. The initial training consisted of one 4-hour in-person session. Use of the Parent Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) was discussed, as was the importance of applying it universally during regular checkups. PCPs SEEK Parent Handouts on each targeted problem. We held 1-hour booster sessions every 6 months over the subsequent 2.5 years.
Model Care
The Model Care provided training to pediatric health care providers to assess parental psychosocial risk factors to child maltreatment.
Standard Care
PCPs in Standard Care group served as the controls. They continued to practice as usual.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Model Care
The Model Care provided training to pediatric health care providers to assess parental psychosocial risk factors to child maltreatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fluent english
* Mother agrees to participate
* Health Care provider is provider at involved practice
* Health Care provider agrees to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Mother does not speak english
* Mother declines participation
* Health Care providers practice is not involved in study
* Health Care provider declines
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
OTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Howard Dubowitz, MD MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Maryland, School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00040157 (H-27327)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.