Disseminating Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support to Improve Detection, Evaluation and Reporting
NCT ID: NCT03840798
Last Updated: 2021-01-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
351 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-26
2020-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Accurate and timely recognition of the early signs of child maltreatment is critical to decreasing morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of children who suffer severe morbidity and/or mortality from maltreatment had been previously evaluated by physician(s) who did not recognize the abuse. The American Academy of Pediatrics has evidence-based recommendations for the testing which should be done as part of the medical evaluation of children with suspected physical abuse. However, despite these evidence-based recommendations, physicians fail to consistently screen for and evaluate for abuse even in high-risk situations.
The investigators have developed and evaluated what the investigators believe to be the first, comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) based child abuse clinical decision support (CA-CDS). This EHR-based CA-CDS system informs medical care at multiple points during the care for a potentially maltreated child, beginning with identification of suspected abuse to the handing off of information to CPS which has a mandate to protect children who are victims of suspected maltreatment.
The investigators are disseminating the following aspects of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) based child abuse- clinical decision support (CA-CDS) system which they developed as part of the investigator's initial PCORI grant.
1. a universal child abuse screen (CAS) - supports identification of maltreatment
2. an embedded child abuse alert system - supports identification of maltreatment
3. alerts to physicians and advanced practice providers - supports identification of maltreatment
4. physical abuse order set - supports proper evaluation of suspected physical abuse
5. documentation assistance for making reports of suspected maltreatment to Child Protective Services - supports mandated reporting
The primary objective is to disseminate and implement CA-CDS in two different EHRs in two hospital systems - Northwell Health (NY) and University of Wisconsin (WI) - and to assess whether the CA-CDS improves identification, evaluation and mandated reporting of child maltreatment.
Aim #1 is to compare the rates of identification of possible child abuse - defined as reports to Child Protective Services - before and after integration of CA-CDS into the EHR among children presenting to 5 Emergency Departments in two different health systems.
Aim #2 is to compare the rate of physician compliance with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for evaluation of suspected physical abuse before and after integration of CA-CDS into the EHR in 5 Emergency Departments in two health care systems.
Once the D\&I is complete, the investigators will have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing the CA-CDS in the three EHRs which make up 85% of all the US EHRs. This is a critical step towards the goal of having a CA-CDS as a standard EHR component.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preventing Child Abuse in Infants
NCT00000382
A Medical Home-Based Intervention to Prevent Child Neglect in High-Risk Families
NCT02857673
iLook Out for Child Abuse: An Innovative Learning Module for Childcare Providers
NCT03185728
Supporting Parents Program: Intervention for Families in CPS
NCT01332851
Online Emotional Response to Completing a Childhood Maltreatment Self-report Scale
NCT06152549
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Accurate and timely recognition of the early signs of child maltreatment is critical to decreasing morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of children who suffer severe morbidity and/or mortality from maltreatment had been previously evaluated by physician(s) who did not recognize the abuse. The American Academy of Pediatrics has evidence-based recommendations for the testing which should be done as part of the medical evaluation of children with suspected physical abuse. However, despite these evidence-based recommendations, physicians fail to consistently screen for and evaluate for abuse even in high-risk situations.
The investigators have developed and evaluated what the investigators believe to be the first, comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) based child abuse clinical decision support (CA-CDS). This EHR-based CA-CDS system informs medical care at multiple points during the care for a potentially maltreated child, beginning with identification of suspected abuse to the handing off of information to CPS which has a mandate to protect children who are victims of suspected maltreatment.
The investigators are disseminating the following aspects of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) based child abuse- clinical decision support (CA-CDS) system which they developed as part of the investigator's initial PCORI grant.
1. a universal child abuse screen (CAS) - supports identification of maltreatment
2. an embedded child abuse alert system - supports identification of maltreatment
3. alerts to physicians and advanced practice providers - supports identification of maltreatment
4. physical abuse order set - supports proper evaluation of suspected physical abuse
5. documentation assistance for making reports of suspected maltreatment to Child Protective Services - supports mandated reporting
The primary objective is to disseminate and implement CA-CDS in two different EHRs in two hospital systems - Northwell Health (NY) and University of Wisconsin (WI) - and to assess whether the CA-CDS improves identification, evaluation and mandated reporting of child maltreatment.
Aim #1 is to compare the rates of identification of possible child abuse - defined as reports to Child Protective Services - before and after integration of CA-CDS into the EHR among children presenting to 5 Emergency Departments in two different health systems.
Aim #2 is to compare the rate of physician compliance with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for evaluation of suspected physical abuse before and after integration of CA-CDS into the EHR in 5 Emergency Departments in two health care systems.
Process metrics: Rapid cycle usability testing will be one of the earliest assessments of the end-user acceptability of the CA-CDS and changes will be made to the CA-CDS based on these data. Process metrics which will be measured throughout the live period, including proportion of patients who receive a CAS, how often the CAS is positive, which question(s) of the CAS are positive, how often any part of the CA-CDS triggers, how often order sets are used, and how often providers dismiss the alert.
Short-term outcomes: Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the demographics of the population. For Aim 1, the primary outcome is the report made to CPS. The proportion of children who have a report made to CPS will be calculated for both the silent mode (before) and live (after) groups, including race and insurance type. For Aim 2, the primary outcome is compliance with the AAP guidelines for evaluation of suspected abuse in children \<2 yrs of age. The proportion of providers who are compliant with the guidelines will be calculated for both groups. Another short-term outcome will be the use of provider surveys to determine the impact of the CA-CDS on clinical decision making and efficacy with identifying and evaluating suspected child maltreatment. The investigators will also evaluate the impact of provider training and patient racial, ethnic and socioeconomic status on these outcomes.
Long-term outcomes: A long-term outcome is whether the CA-CDS is integrated into clinical practice after the end of the D\&I. Another long-term outcome is evaluation of the proportion of cases of child maltreatment in which the child had been evaluated at least once previously and the diagnosis of abuse was missed; a decrease in this proportion is a true measure of improved outcome.
Once the D\&I is complete, the investigators will have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing the CA-CDS in the three EHRs which make up 85% of all the US EHRs. This is a critical step towards the goal of having a CA-CDS as a standard EHR component.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pretest/Baseline period
No interventions assigned to this group
Posttest/go-live period
Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support system
The investigators are implementing the following aspects of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) based child abuse- clinical decision support (CA-CDS) system.
1. a universal child abuse screen (CAS)
2. an embedded child abuse alert system
3. alerts to physicians and advanced practice providers
4. physical abuse order sets
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support system
The investigators are implementing the following aspects of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) based child abuse- clinical decision support (CA-CDS) system.
1. a universal child abuse screen (CAS)
2. an embedded child abuse alert system
3. alerts to physicians and advanced practice providers
4. physical abuse order sets
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
13 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Northwell Health
OTHER
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rachel Berger MD, MPH
Professor of Pediatrics and Clinical and Translational Science, Chief, Division of Child Advocacy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rachel Berger, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DI-2017C1-6215
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PRO18010135
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.